## Abstract

We address the question of whether it is possible to operate a time machine by manipulating matter and energy so as to manufacture closed timelike curves. This question has received a great deal of attention in the physics literature, with attempts to prove no-go theorems based on classical general relativity and various hybrid theories serving as steps along the way towards quantum gravity. Despite the effort put into these no-go theorems, there is no widely accepted definition of a time machine. We explain the conundrum that must be faced in providing a satisfactory definition and propose a resolution. Roughly, we require that all extensions of the time machine region contain closed timelike curves; the actions of the time machine operator are then sufficiently “potent” to guarantee that closed timelike curves appear. We then review no-go theorems based on classical general relativity, semi-classical quantum gravity, quantum field theory on curved spacetime, and Euclidean quantum gravity. Our verdict on the question of our title is that no result of sufficient generality to underwrite a confident “yes” has been proven. Our review of the no-go results does, however, highlight several foundational problems at the intersection of general relativity and quantum physics that lend substance to the search for an answer.

## Article PDF

### Similar content being viewed by others

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

## References

Arntzenius, F., & Maudlin, T. (2005). Time travel and modern physics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.),

*Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy*. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/time-travel-phys/.Bojowald M. (2001) Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cosmology. Physical Review Letters 86: 5227–5230

Boulware D.G. (1992) Quantum field theory in spacetime with closed timelike curves. Physical Review D 46: 4421–4441

Brunnemann J., Thiemann T. (2006) On (cosmological) singularity avoidance in loop quantum gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity 23: 1395–1428

Carroll J.W. (1994) Laws of nature. Cambridge University Press, New York

Carroll J.W. (2004) Readings on laws of nature. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA

Carroll, S. (2004). Why is the universe accelerating? In W. L. Friedman (Ed.),

*Measuring and Modeling the Universe*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. astro-ph/0310342.Cassidy M.J., Hawking S.W. (1998) Models for chronology selection. Physical Review D 57: 2372–2380

Chrusciel P.T., Isenberg J. (1993) Compact Cauchy horizons and Cauchy surfaces. In: Hu B.L., Jacobson T.A.(eds) Directions in general relativity (vol 2). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–107

Cramer C.R., Kay B.S. (1996) Stress-energy must be singular on the Misner space horizon even for automorphic field. Classical and Quantum Gravity 13: L143–L149

Davies P. (2002) How to build a time machine. Viking Penguin, New York

Deutsch D. (1991) Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. Physical Review D 44: 3197–3271

Deutsch D., Lockwood M. (1994) The quantum physics of time travel. Scientific American 270((March): 68–74

Earman J. (1995) Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: Singularities and acausalities in relativistic spacetimes. Oxford University Press, New York

Earman, J., & Wüthrich, C. (2004). Time machines. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.),

*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy*.http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/time-machine/.Everett A. (2004) Time travel paradoxes, path integrals, and the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Physical Review D 69: 124023

Fewster, C. J. (2005). Energy inequalities in quantum field theory. math-ph/0501073.

Fewster C.J., Higuchi A. (1996) Quantum field theory on certain non-globally hyperbolic spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity 13: 51–61

Fewster C.J., Wells C.G. (1995) Unitarity of quantum field theory and closed timelike curves. Physical Review D 52: 5773–5782

Ford L.H., Roman T.A. (1996) Quantum field theory constrains traversable wormhole geometries. Physical Review D 53: 5496–5507

Friedman J.L. (1997) Field theory on spacetimes that are not globally hyperbolic. Fields Institute Communications 15: 43–57

Friedman J.L., Papastamatiou N.J., Simon J.Z. (1992) Failure of unitarity for interacting fields on spacetimes with closed timelike curves. Physical Review D 46: 4456–4469

Friedman J.L., Schleich K., Witt D.M. (1993) Topological censorship. Physical Review Letters 71: 1486–1489

Frolov V.P. (1991) Vacuum polarization in a locally static multiply connected spacetime and time machine problems. Physical Review D 43: 3878–3894

Geroch R.P. (1970) Domain of dependence. Journal of Mathematical Physics 11: 437–449

Geroch R.P. (1977) Prediction in general relativity. In: Earman J., Glymour C., Stachel J.(eds) Foundations of spacetime theories, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (vol 8). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 81–93

Gibbons G.W., Hawking S.W. (1993) Euclidean quantum gravity. World Scientific, Singapore

Gott R. (1991) Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: Exact solutions. Physical Review Letters 66: 1126–1129

Gott R. (2001) Time travel in Einstein’s universe. Houghton Mifflin, New York

Hartle J., Hawking S.W. (1983) Wave function of the universe. Physical Review D 28: 2960–2975

Hawking S.W. (1992a) Chronology protection conjecture. Physical Review D 46: 603–611

Hawking S.W. (1992) The chronology protection conjecture. In: Sato H., Nakamura T.(eds) The sixth Marcel Grossmann meeting. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 3–13

Hawking S.W., Ellis G.F.R. (1973) The large scale structure of spacetime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Hawking S.W., Thorne K.S., Novikov I., Ferris T., Lightman A. (2002) The future of spacetime. W. W. Norton, New York

Hiscock, W. A. (2000). Quantized fields and chronology protection. gr-qc/0009061 v2.

Hochberg D., Visser M. (1997) Geometric structure of the generic traversable wormhole throat. Physical Review D 56: 4745–4755

Hochberg, D. & Visser, M. (1999). General dynamic wormholes and violation of the null energy condition. gr-qc/9901020.

Horwich P. (1987) Asymmetries in time. MIT Press, Cambridge

Isenberg J., Moncrief V. (1985) Symmetries of cosmological Cauchy horizons with exceptional orbits. Journal of Mathematical Physics 26: 1024–1027

Isham C., Butterfield J. (1999) On the emergence of time in quantum gravity. In: Butterfield J.(eds) The arguments of time. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–168

Kay B.S. (1992) The principle of locality and quantum field theory on (non-globally hyperbolic) curved spacetimes. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, Special Issue 4: 167–195

Kay B.S. et al (1997) Quantum fields in curved spacetime: Non global hyperbolicity and locality. In: Longo R.(eds) Operator algebras and quantum field theory. International Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 578–588

Kay B.S., Radzikowski M.J., Wald R.M. (1997) Quantum field theory on spacetimes with compactly generated cauchy horizons. Communications in Mathematical Physics 183: 533–556

KimS.-W. Thorne K.S. (1991) Do vacuum fluctuations prevent the creation of closed timelike curves?. Physical Review D: 43(3929–3957): 43, 3929–3957

Krasnikov S.V. (1996) Quantum stability of the time machine. Physical Review D 54: 7322–7327

Krasnikov S.V. (1997) Causality violation and paradoxes. Physical Review D 55: 3427–3430

Krasnikov S.V. (1998) A singularity-free WEC-respecting time machine. Classical and Quantum Gravity 15: 997–1003

Krasnikov S.V. (1999) Quantum field theory and time machines. Physical Review D 59: 024010

Krasnikov S.V. (2002) No time machines in classical general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity 19: 4109–4129

Lewis D.K. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Lobo F.S.N. (2005) Phantom energy and traversable wormholes. Physical Review D 71: 084011

Maeda K., Ishibashi A., Narita M. (1998) Chronology protection and non-naked singularities. Classical and Quantum Gravity 15: 1637–1651

Manchak, J. (2007). On ‘time machines’ in general relativity. Unpublished manuscript.

Nahin P.J. (1999) Time machines (2nd ed). AIP Press, New York

Ori A. (1993) Must time-machine construction violate the weak energy condition?. Physical Review Letters 71: 2517–2520

Ori A. (2005) A class of time-machine solutions with a compact vacuum core. Physical Review Letters 95: 021101

Ori A. (2007) Formation of closed timelike curves in a composite vacuum/dust asymptotically flat spacetime. Physical Review D 76: 044002

Overbye, D. (2005). Remembrances of things future: The mystery of time.

*New York Times*, June 28 2005.Penrose R. (1998) The question of cosmic censorship. In: Wald R.M.(eds) Black holes and relativistic stars. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 103–122

Politzer H.D. (1992) Simple quantum systems with closed timelike curves. Physical Review D 46: 4470–4476

Randles J. (2005) Breaking the time barrier. Paraview Pocketbooks, New York

Rovelli C. (2004) Quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Sushkov S.S. (1997) Chronology protection and quantized fields: complex automorphic scalar field in Misner space. Classical and Quantum Gravity 14: 523–533

Tipler F.J. (1976) Causality violation in asymptotically flat space-times. Physical Review Letters 37: 879–882

Tipler F.J. (1977) Singularities and causality violation. Annals of Physics 108: 1–36

Unruh W., Wald R. (1989) Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity. Physical Review D 40: 2598–614

Visser M. (1997) The reliability horizon for semi-classical quantum gravity: metric fluctuations are often more important than back-reaction. Physics Letters B 415: 8–14

Visser M. (2003) The quantum physics of chronology protection. In: Gibbons G.W., Shellard E.P.S., Rankin S.J.(eds) The future of theoretical physics and cosmology: celebrating Stephen Hawking’s 60th birthday. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–176

Vollick D.N. (1997) How to produce exotic matter using classical fields. Physical Review D 56: 4720–4723

Wald R.M. (1984) General relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Wald R.M. (1994) Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0
), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Earman, J., Smeenk, C. & Wüthrich, C. Do the laws of physics forbid the operation of time machines?.
*Synthese* **169**, 91–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9338-2

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

Issue Date:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9338-2