Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The lover of the beautiful and the good: Platonic foundations of aesthetic and moral value

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though acknowledged by scholars, Plato’s identification of the Beautiful and the Good has generated little interest, even in aesthetics where the moral concepts are a current topic. The view is suspect because, e.g., it is easy to find examples of ugly saints and beautiful sinners. In this paper the thesis is defended using ideas from Plato’s ancient commentators, the Neoplatonists. Most interesting is Proclus, who applied to value theory a battery of linguistic tools with fixed semantic properties—comparative adjectives, associated gradable adjectives, mass nouns, and predicate negations—all with a semantics that demand a privative scale of value. It is shown how it is perfectly possible to interpret value terms Platonically over privative Boolean algebras so that beautifuland good diverge while at higher levels other value terms are coextensional. Considerations are offered that this structure conforms to actual usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J. (1963). The republic of plato (2nd ed). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Åqvist L. (1981). Predicate calculi with adjectives and nouns. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell M.J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In: Partee B. (eds) Montague grammar. N.Y., Academic Press, pp. 260–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn L.R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn L., Kato Y. (eds) (2000). Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (2001). Polar opposition and the ontology of degrees. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1): 33–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran M. (eds) (2006). Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz D.H., Duncan Luce R., Suppes P., Tversky A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. I). New York, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1979.

  • Levinson J. (eds) (2001). Aesthetics and ethics: Essays at the intersection. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin N. (1995). Existence, negation, and abstraction in the neoplatonic hierarchy. History and Philosophy of Logic 16: 169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J.N. (2001). Proclus and the neoplatonic syllogistic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30: 187–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J.N. (2002). Lukaisiewicz’ many-valued logic and neoplatonic scalar modality. History and Philosophy of Logic 23: 95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J.N. (2004). Themes in neoplatonic and aristotelian logic: Order, negation and abstraction. London, Ashgate Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleship R.L. (1962). Lectures on Plato’s republic (2nd ed). London, Macmilliam

    Google Scholar 

  • Proclus. (1758–1932). The commentaries of Proclus on the timaeus of plato (Vol. 1., p. 334), Book II, Kans. Thomas Taylor, reprint edition. Kessinger Publishing Co: Kila, MIT.

  • Proclus (1963). The elements of theology (2nd ed) (Dodds E. D., Ed. and trans). Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Proclus. (1968–1997). Théologie platonicienne. (vol. I–VI). trans. H. D. Saffrey & L. G. Westerink. Paris: Les Belle Lettres.

  • Proclus. (1987). Proclus’ commentary on Plato’s parmenides. trans. J. M. Dillon & G. R. Morrow. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University of Press.

  • Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. (1937). On the divine names, p.71., In Phillipe Chevallier et al. (Eds.), Dionysius areopagita. Bruges: Desclée Brouwer et Cie.

  • Seuren, P. A. M. (1978). The structure and selection of positive and negative gradable adjectives. In Donkar, F. Jacobson, W. M. Todos, K. W. Papers from the parasession on the Lexicon. Chicago Linguistics Society, April 14–15, 1978, C.L.S., University of Chicago, 1978.

  • Seuren P.A.M. (1973). The Comparative. In: Keifer F., Ruwet N. (eds) Generative grammar in Europe. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 528–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren P.A.M. (1984). The comparative revisited. Journal of Semantics 3: 109–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A.E. (1960). Plato, the man and his works. London, Methuen

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    John Neil Martin

Authors
  1. John Neil Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Neil Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, J.N. The lover of the beautiful and the good: Platonic foundations of aesthetic and moral value. Synthese 165, 31–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9231-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9231-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation