Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An efficient energy-aware and reliable routing protocol to enhance the performance of wireless body area networks

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wireless body area network (WBAN) is a type of wireless sensor network that plays a crucial role in monitoring patient healthcare. In this network, sensor nodes are typically placed inside or outside the patient’s body. These nodes are capable of transmitting data to the sink node when any functional changes in the patient are detected. The routing and energy efficiency of the network nodes are challenging tasks in WBAN, as each sensor node operates on a battery. Therefore, in multi-hop routing designing a robust routing protocol has a significant impact on reducing energy consumption during the selection of the next hop. In this paper, a simple novel routing protocol named simple energy-aware and reliable (SEAR) routing protocol is proposed to transmit reliable data packets in a WBAN. The proposed routing scheme considers the remaining energy of sensor nodes, priority data, and hop count to the sink node as significant metrics for dynamically selecting the best forwarder node. Furthermore, the proposed protocol utilizes the route reliability factor (RRF) to select the optimal route among all possible routes between the source sensor node and the sink node. RRF selects the route with the maximum route residual energy and minimum hop count. As a result, SEAR has the ability to provide effective single-hop and multi-hop routing data transmission to improve the reliability of data transmission, decrease the energy consumption of the sensor nodes, and prolong the lifetime of the network. The simulation results show that the performance of the SEAR routing protocol outperforms the existing routing protocols for the metrics: packet loss ratio, throughput, end-to-end delay, normalized routing load, energy consumption, and network lifetime. The results indicate that the proposed protocol improves total energy consumption by 18.76% and 10.89% when compared to EERR-RLFL and AMCRP respectively. Meanwhile, SEAR reduces the average end-to-end delay by 17% and 9%, packet loss ratio by 29.48% and 17.69%, and normalized routing load by 31.17% and 20.91%. Additionally, SEAR achieves up to 16% and 9.71% higher throughput compared to EERR-RLFL and AMCRP routing protocols respectively. Overall, the results obtained indicate that the proposed SEAR routing scheme significantly enhances the overall performance of the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Algorithm 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript article.

Code availability

The code used or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Movassaghi S, Abolhasan M, Lipman J, Smith D, Jamalipour A (2014) Wireless body area networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(3):1658–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ullah F, Khan MZ, Mehmood G, Qureshi MS, Fayaz M (2022) Energy efficiency and reliability considerations in wireless body area networks: a survey. Comput Math Methods Med 2022:1090131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad N, Awan MD, Khiyal MSH, Babar MI, Abdelmaboud A, Ibrahim HA, Hamed NO (2022) Improved QoS aware routing protocol (IM-QRP) for WBAN based healthcare monitoring system. IEEE Access 10:121864–121885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang G, Wu XW, Li Y, Ye Q (2020) Energy efficient protocol for routing and scheduling in wireless body area networks. Wirel Netw 26:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Zheng G, Ma H, Bai W, Wu H, Ji B (2021) Fuzzy control-based energy-aware routing protocol for wireless body area networks. J Sens 2021:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zadoo M, Sharma M, Choudhary A (2022) FEELS: fuzzy based energy efficient and low SAR routing protocol for wireless body area networks. Wirel Netw 28(8):3593–3611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma S, Mishra VM, Tripathi MM (2022) A novel energy efficient hybrid Meta-heuristic approach (NEEMA) for wireless body area network. Int J Commun Syst 35(13):e5249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poongodi T, Rathee A, Indrakumari R, Suresh P (2020) IoT sensing capabilities: sensor deployment and node discovery, wearable sensors, wireless body area network (WBAN), data acquisition. Principles of internet of things (IoT) ecosystem: insight paradigm. Springer, Cham, pp 127–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hajar MS, Al-Kadri MO, Kalutarage HK (2021) A survey on wireless body area networks: architecture, security challenges and research opportunities. Comput Secur 104:102211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen NT, Liu BH, Pham VT, Luo YS (2016) On maximizing the lifetime for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks using virtual data aggregation trees. Comput Netw 105:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamruzzaman MM, Alruwaili O (2022) Energy efficient sustainable wireless body area network design using network optimization with smart grid and renewable energy systems. Energy Rep 8:3780–3788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed G, Jianhua Z, Fareed MMS (2017) PERA: priority-based energy-efficient routing algorithm for WBANs. Wirel Pers Commun 96(3):4737–4753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akbar S, Mehdi MM, Jamal MH, Raza I, Hussain SA, Breñosa J, Espinosa JC, Pascual Barrera AE, Ashraf I (2022) Multipath routing in wireless body area sensor network for healthcare monitoring. InHealthcare 10(11):2297. MDPI.

  14. Fort A, Ryckaert J, Desset C, De Doncker P, Wambacq P, Van Biesen L (2006) Ultra-wideband channel model for communication around the human body. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 24(4):927–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdullah A, Ozen E, Bayramoglu H (2022) Enhanced-AODV routing protocol to improve route stability of MANETs. Int Arab J Inf Technol 19(5):736–746

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arafat MY, Pan S, Bak E (2023) Distributed energy-efficient clustering and routing for wearable IoT enabled wireless body area networks. IEEE Access 11:5047–5061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chavva SR, Sangam RS (2022) SIMPLE-DRR: A new energy-efficient multi-hop routing protocol in WBANs for health monitoring. In Advances in micro-electronics Embedded Systems and IoT. Springer, Singapore, pp 29–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Akbar MS, Hussain Z, Sheng M, Shankaran R (2022) Wireless body area sensor networks: Survey of MAC and routing protocols for patient monitoring under IEEE 802.15. 4 and IEEE 802.15. 6. Sensors 22(21):8279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdullah AM (2023) A novel routing protocol for VANETs based on link stability and available bandwidth. Adhoc Sens Wirel Netw 55:95–122

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abdullah AM, Ozen E, Bayramoglu H (2020) Energy efficient MANET routing protocol based on ant colony optimization. Adhoc Sens Wirel Netw 47(1–4):73–96

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abdullah AM, Ozen E, Bayramoglu H (2019) Investigating the impact of mobility models on MANET routing protocols. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yessad N, Omar M, Tari A, Bouabdallah A (2018) QoS-based routing in wireless body area networks: a survey and taxonomy. Computing 100(3):245–275

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ullah F, Khan MZ, Faisal M, Rehman HU, Abbas S, Mubarek FS (2021) An energy efficient and reliable routing scheme to enhance the stability period in wireless body area networks. Comput Commun 165:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad N, Shahzad B, Arif M, Izdrui D, Ungurean I, Geman O (2022) An energy-efficient framework for WBAN in health care domain. J Sens. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5823461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim BS, Kim KI, Shah B, Ullah S (2019) A forwarder based temperature aware routing protocol in wireless body area networks. J Int Technol 20(4):1157–1166

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abdullah AM, Aziz RHH (2014) The impact of reactive routing protocols for transferring multimedia data over MANET. J Zankoy Sulaimani-Part A 16(4):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mateen Yaqoob M, Khurshid W, Liu L, Zulqarnain Arif S, Ali Khan I, Khalid O, Nawaz R (2022) Adaptive multi-cost routing protocol to enhance lifetime for wireless body area network. Comput Mater Contin 72(1):1089–1103

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guo W, Wang Y, Gan Y, Lu T (2022) Energy efficient and reliable routing in wireless body area networks based on reinforcement learning and fuzzy logic. Wirel Netw 28(6):2669–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goyal R, Mittal N, Gupta L, Surana A (2023) Routing protocols in wireless body area networks: architecture, challenges, and classification. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9229297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qu Y, Zheng G, Ma H, Wang X, Ji B, Wu H (2019) A survey of routing protocols in WBAN for healthcare applications. Sensors 19(7):1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmed G, Mahmood D, Islam S (2019) Thermal and energy aware routing in wireless body area networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 15(6):1550147719854974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bilandi N, Verma HK, Dhir R (2021) Energy-efficient relay node selection scheme for sustainable wireless body area networks. Sustain Comput Inform Syst 30:100516

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim B, Cho J, Jeon S, Lee B (2016) An AHP-based flexible relay node selection scheme for WBANs. Wirel Pers Commun 89:501–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Navya V, Deepalakshmi P (2021) Threshold-based energy-efficient routing for transmission of critical physiological parameters in a wireless body area network under emergency scenarios. Int J Comput Appl 43(4):367–376

    Google Scholar 

  35. Esmaeili H, Bidgoli BM (2018) EMRP: evolutionary-based multi-hop routing protocol for wireless body area networks. AEU-int J Electron Commun 93:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu H, Zhu H, Gu J, Peng C, Han X (2022) Efficient health data transmission method in a wireless body area network for rural elderly. Electronics 11(18):2817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abdullah AM (2024) Energy-efficient aware and predicting bandwidth estimation routing protocol for hybrid communication in wireless body area networks. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-023-04262-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiran MV, Nithya B (2023) Stable and energy-efficient next-hop router selection (SE-NRS) for wireless body area networks. Int J Inf Technol 15(2):1189–1200

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ullah F, Ullah Z, Ahmad S, Islam IU, Rehman SU, Iqbal J (2019) Traffic priority based delay-aware and energy efficient path allocation routing protocol for wireless body area network. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:3775–3794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahmed O, Hu M, Ren F (2021) PEDTARA: priority-based energy efficient, delay and temperature aware routing algorithm using multi-objective genetic chaotic spider monkey optimization for critical data transmission in WBANs. Electronics 11(1):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bedi P, Das S, Goyal SB, Shukla PK, Mirjalili S, Kumar M (2022) A novel routing protocol based on grey wolf optimization and Q learning for wireless body area network. Expert Syst Appl 210:118477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Roshini A, Kiran KVD (2023) Hierarchical energy efficient secure routing protocol for optimal route selection in wireless body area networks. Int J Intell Netw 4:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  43. Takabayashi K, Tanaka H, Sugimoto C, Sakakibara K, Kohno R (2018) Performance evaluation of a quality of service control scheme in multi-hop WBAN based on IEEE 802.15. 6. Sensors 18(11):3969

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, College of Basic Education, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

    Ako Muhammad Abdullah

Authors
  1. Ako Muhammad Abdullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.A contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, software, investigation, validation, resources, writing—original draft, review & editing, visualization, resources, and writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ako Muhammad Abdullah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdullah, A.M. An efficient energy-aware and reliable routing protocol to enhance the performance of wireless body area networks. J Supercomput (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06039-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06039-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation