Abstract
How to find the best learning performance in the network experimental course is an important research topic. Therefore, collaborative learning and personalized learning have been applied in traditional classes for a similar significance regardless of how times change and advancements develop. We used the computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) pedagogy with NetGuru network experimental platform and the computer-supported personalized learning (CSPL) pedagogy with the teaching assistant on demand (TAoD) network experimental platform, respectively, in the “Network Engineering Lab (1)” course to assess the distinctions in impacts for the two methods. The objective students were four junior classes of ordinary students in the department of Computer Information and Network Engineering. As a rule, one should think about that CSCL pedagogy is better than CSPL pedagogy because of discussion and collaborative learning between students for learning performances. Nonetheless, the fact that the missing and late rates of students in technical and vocational college are a lot higher that makes adopting CSCL pedagogy difficult. Therefore, we designed and made some assistant materials of “graphical-based teaching powerpoint slides,” “animations of packet transmission process for network protocol theories,” and “Customized IP-oriented template-based assignments (simplified as CIPOTA or template-based assignment)” to be applied to compare and analyze the network practices of CSCL-based on NetGuru platform and CSPL-based on TAoD platform. We also design “satisfaction scale of learning performance” to analyze the students’ satisfaction degrees of learning performance with the pedagogy (CSCL or CSPL), the assignment form (normal assignment or template-based assignment), and the learning satisfaction (CSCL or CSPL combines the normal assignment or template-based assignment). They were for the most part being utilized to demonstrate that TAoD platform-based CSPL pedagogy is truly appropriate for network experiment courses. And the CSPL pedagogy is not more terrible than the CSCL pedagogy and may even bring about optimizing learning results for the learning of network experiment course.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
10 October 2022
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04855-z
References
Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Holubec EJ (1994) The new circles of learning cooperation in the classroom and school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria
Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1994) Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights
Sharan S, Shachar H (1988) Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. Springer, New York
Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1987) Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hiltz SR (1994) The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. Ablex Publishing Corporation, New York
Sun CT, Lin SSJ (2001) Learning through collaborative design: a learning strategy on the internet. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, Oct 2001
Butler D, Winne P (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 65(3):245–281
Zurita G, Nussbaum M (2007) A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. Br J Educ Technol 38(2):211–235
Infante C, Weitz J, Reyes T, Nussbaum M, Gomez F, Radovic D (2010) Co-located collaborative learning video game with single display groupware. Interact Learn Environ 18(2):177–195
Chang KE, Sung YT, Lee CL (2003) Web-based collaborative inquiry learning. J Comput Assist Learn 19(1):56–69
Zurita G, Nussbaum M (2004) Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Comput Educ 42(3):289–314
Hwang G-J, Yin P-Y, Hwang C-W, Tsai C-C (2008) An enhanced genetic approach to composing cooperative learning groups for multiple grouping criteria. Educ Technol Soc 11(1):148–167
Parkhurst H, Bassett R, Eades J (1987) Education on the Dalton plan. B. P. Button & Company, New York
Semel SF (1999) The Dalton school: The transformation of a progressive school. In: Semel SF, Sadovnik AR (eds) Schools of tomorrow, schools of today. Peter Lang, New York, pp 171–212
Corcoran T (1927) The Winnetka school plan. Ir Mon 55(644):63–67
Washburne C (1941) A living philosophy of education. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kilpatrick WH (1926) Foundations of method informal: talks on teaching. MACMILLAN, New York
Kilpatrick WH (1929) The project method: the use of the purposeful act in the educative process. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
Bloom BS (1968) Learning for mastery. Eval Comment 1(2):1–12
Bloom BS (1984) The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ Leadersh 41(8):4–17
Keller FS (1968) Good-bye teacher. J Appl Behav Anal 1(1):79–89
El-Bishouty MM, Ogata H, Yano Y (2007) PERKAM: personalized knowledge awareness map for computer supported ubiquitous learning. J Educ Technol Soc 10(3):122–134
Rani M, Nayak R, Vyas OP (2015) An ontology-based adaptive personalized e-learning system, assisted by software agents on cloud storage. Knowl Based Syst 90:33–48
Hwang G-J, Kuo F-R, Yin P-Y, Chuang K-H (2010) A Heuristic Algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Comput Educ 54(2):404–415
Lilia CB (2016) Personalized feedback for self assessment in lifelong learning environments based on semantic web. Comput Hum Behav 55(Part A):562–570
Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1988) Cirles of learning. Associaition for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria
Sharan S, Shaulov A (1990) Cooperative learning, motivation to learn and academic achievement. In: Sharan S (ed) Cooperative learning: theory and research. Praeger, New York, pp 173–202
Slavin RE (1990) Cooperative learning. Celin Rogers: the social psychology of the primary school. KKY, NY
Wierwille WW, Eggemeier FT (1993) Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum Fact 35(2):263–281
Chen J-C (2012) A study on the influence of cooperative learning into comprehension teaching method on the learning performances and motivations of the difficulty of different motor skills. NCYU J Phys Educ Health Recreat 11(2):166–176
Willliams AM, Hodges JN (2005) Practice, instruction, and skill acquisition in soccer: challenging tradition. J Sports Sci 23(6):637–650
Wulf G, Shea CH (2002) Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev 9(2):185–211
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C., under Grant MOST 107-2511-H-262-001-.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04855-z
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YH., Lee, WC., Tseng, CH. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Cognitive learning performance assessment and analysis with CSCL applied on the NetGuru platform and CSPL applied on the TAoD platform for the network experiment class. J Supercomput 76, 16–46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02836-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02836-3