Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internet of Music Things: an edge computing paradigm for opportunistic crowdsensing

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Device centric music computation in the era of the Internet is participant-centric data recognition and computation that includes devices such as smartphones, real sound sensors, and computing systems. These participatory devices enhance the progression of Internet of Things, the devices which are responsible for gathering sensor data to the devices as per the requirements of the end users. This contribution analyzes a class of qualitative music composition applications in the context of the Internet of Things that we entitle as the Internet of Music Things. In this work, participated individuals having sensing devices capable of music sensing and computation share data within a group and retrieve information for analyzing and mapping any interconnected processes of common interest. We present the crowdsensing architecture for music composition in this contribution. Musical components like vocal and instrumental performances are provided by a committed edge layer in music crowdsensing architecture for improving computational efficiencies and lessening data traffic in cloud services for information processing and storage. Proposed opportunistic music crowdsensing orchestration organizes a categorical step toward aggregated music composition and sharing within the network. We also discuss an analytical case study of music crowdsensing challenges, clarify the unique features, and demonstrate edge-cloud computing paradigm along with deliberate outcomes. The requirement for four-layer unified crowdsensing archetype is discussed. The data transmission time, power, and relevant energy consumption of the proposed system are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jian A, Gui X, Yang J, Sun Y, He X (2015) Mobile crowd sensing for internet of things: A credible crowdsourcing model in mobile-sense service. In: Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), IEEE International Conference, pp 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigMM.2015.62

  2. Ganti RK, Fan Y, Hui L (2011) Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Commun Mag. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Y, Houbing S, Antonio JJ, Rongfang B (2016) Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access 4:766–773. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2529723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arkian HR, Abolfazl D, Atefe P (2017) MIST: Fog-based data analytics scheme with cost-efficient resource provisioning for IoT crowdsensing applications. J Netw Comput Appl 82:152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durao F, Carvalho JFS, Fonseka A, Garcia VC (2014) A systematic review on cloud computing. J Supercomput 68:1321–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-014-1089-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diaz M, Martin C, Rubio B (2016) State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing. J Netw Comput Appl 67:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalcante E, Pereira J, Alves MP, Maia P (2016) On the interplay of internet of things and cloud computing: a systematic mapping study. J Comput Commun 89(9):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy DG, De D, Mukherjee A, Buyya R (2017) Application-aware cloudlet selection for computation offloading in multi-cloudlet environment. J Supercomput 73(4):1672–1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1872-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahmud R, Kotagiri R, Buyya R (2018) Fog computing: a taxonomy, survey and future directions. In: Di Martino B, Li KC, Yang L, Esposito A (eds) Internet of everything. Internet of things (technology, communications and computing). Springer, Singapore, pp 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5861-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal S, Yadav S, Yadav AK (2016) An efficient architecture and algorithm for resource provisioning in fog computing. Int J Inf Eng Electron Bus 8(1):48. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2016.01.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alzamil I, Djemame K, Armstrong D, Kavanagh R (2015) Energy-aware profiling for cloud computing environments. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 318:91–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2015.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnan AS, Xiping H, Jun-qi D, Renfei W, Min L, Chunsheng Z, Victor CML, Yu-Kwong K (2015) A novel cloud-based crowd sensing approach to context-aware music mood-mapping for drivers. In: Cloud computing technology and science (CloudCom), pp 475–478. https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2015.85

  13. Hu X (2015) A platform for building context-aware mobile crowdsensing applications in vehicular social networks. PhD diss., University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0216020

  14. Obinikpo A, Yuan Z, Houbing S, Tom HL, Burak K (2017) Queuing algorithm for effective target coverage in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2688366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song S, Sunae S, Younghwan J, Seoungjin L, Baek-Young C (2015) Effective opportunistic crowd sensing IoT system for restoring missing objects. In: Services Computing (SCC), IEEE International Conference on, pp 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2015.48

  16. Alvaro JL, Barros B (2013) A new cloud computing architecture for music composition. J Netw Comput Appl 36(1):429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roy S, Bhakta P, De D, Chakrabarty S (2014) Modeling high performance music computing using Petri Nets. In: Control, instrumentation, energy and communication (CIEC), IEEE, pp 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEC.2014.6959176

  18. Deng F, Guan S, Yue X, Gu X, Chen J, Lv J, Li J (2017) Energy-based sound source localization with low power consumption in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2652394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonomi F, Milito R, Natarajan P, Zhu J (2014) Fog computing: a platform for internet of things and analytics. In: Big data and internet of things: a roadmap for smart environments. Springer International Publishing, pp 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong HJ, Ching-Ling F, Yen-Chen L, Cheng-Hsin H (2016) Optimizing cloud-based video crowdsensing. IEEE Internet Things J 3(3):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2519502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheng H, Jian T, Xuejie X, Guoliang X (2014) Leveraging GPS-less sensing scheduling for green mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Internet Things J 1(4):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2334271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Antonić A, Martina M, Krešimir P, Ivana PZ (2016) A mobile crowd sensing ecosystem enabled by CUPUS: Cloud-based publish/subscribe middleware for the internet of things. Future Gener Comput Syst 56:607–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkar S, Misra S (2016) Theoretical modelling of fog computing: a green computing paradigm to support IoT applications. IET Netw 5(2):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-net.2015.0034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tortonesi M, Michaelis J, Suri N, Baker M (2016) Software-defined and value-based information processing and dissemination in IoT applications. In: Network operations and management symposium (NOMS), IEEE/IFIP, pp 789–793. https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502900

  25. Yang J, Li J, Liu S (2018) A new algorithm of stock data mining in internet of multimedia things. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2195-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zanella A, Bui N, Castellani Vangelista L, Zorzi M (2014) Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J 1(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vakintis I, Panagiotakis S, Mastorakis G, Mavromoustakis CX (2016) Evaluation of a Web crowd-sensing IoT ecosystem providing Big data analysis. In: Resource management for big data platforms, Springer International Publishing, pp 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44881-7_22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sarkar S, Chatterjee S, Misra S (2015) Assessment of the suitability of fog computing in the context of internet of things. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2015.2485206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou J, Leppanen T, Harjula E, Ylianttila M, Ojala T, Yu C, Jin H, Yang LT (2013) Cloudthings: a common architecture for integrating the internet of things with cloud computing. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), IEEE 17th International Conference, IEEE, pp 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2013.6581037

  30. Yamamoto H, Kuriyama Y (2017) Ishii H (2017) Estimating the processing time of a model of cloud computing. J Supercomput 73:2483–2493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1940-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Varghese B, Buyya R (2018) Next generation cloud computing: new trends and research directions. Future Gener Comput Syst 79:849–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mukherjee A, Deb P, De D, Buyya R (2018) C2OF2 N: a low power cooperative code offloading method for femtolet-based fog network. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2269-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy S, Chakrabarty S, De D (2017) Time-based raga recommendation and information retrieval of musical patterns in Indian classical music using neural networks. IAES Int J Artif Intell (IJ-AI) 6(1):33–48. https://doi.org/10.11591/ij-ai.v6.i1.pp33-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alamri A, Ansari WS, Hassan MM, Hossain MS, Alelaiwi A, Hossain MA (2013) A survey on sensor-cloud: architecture, applications and approaches. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 9(2):917923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/917923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. You SD, Lin YC (2016) Simulated smart phone recordings for audio identification. J Supercomput 72(5):1799–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1533-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khorasani F, Naji HR (2017) Energy efficient data aggregation in wireless sensor networks using neural networks. Int J Sens Netw 24(1):26–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSNET.2017.084207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Varia J, Mathew S (2014) Overview of amazon web services. https://aws.amazon.com. pp 1–22. Accessed 20 Nov 2017

  38. Jackson KR, Ramakrishnan L, Muriki K, Canon S, Cholia S, Shalf J, Wasserman HJ and Wright NJ (2010) Performance analysis of high performance computing applications on the amazon web services cloud. In: Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). IEEE Second International Conference. pp 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2010.69

  39. Wang Y, Jia X, Jin Q, Ma J (2015) QuaCentive: a quality-aware incentive mechanism in mobile crowdsourced sensing (MCS). J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1395-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Amazon Web Service, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/putty.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India, for sanctioning a research fellowship under NFOBC scheme with Ref. No.: F./2016-17/NFO-2015-17-OBC-WES-34371 under which this contribution has been completed. Authors are also grateful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST) for sanctioning a project with Ref. No. DST FIST SR/FST/ETI-296/2011 and TEQIP-III, MAKAUT, WB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology (Formerly known as, West Bengal University of Technology), BF – 142, Sector – I, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India

    Samarjit Roy, Sourav Hati & Debashis De

  2. Department of Physics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India

    Dhiman Sarkar

  3. University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Debashis De

Authors
  1. Samarjit Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhiman Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sourav Hati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debashis De
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debashis De.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, S., Sarkar, D., Hati, S. et al. Internet of Music Things: an edge computing paradigm for opportunistic crowdsensing. J Supercomput 74, 6069–6101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2511-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2511-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation