Skip to main content
Log in

A solution to measure traveler’s transfer tolerance for walking mode and dockless bike-sharing mode

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dockless bike-sharing is more and more popular all over the world, which enables passengers to choose destinations more flexibly, so that the transfer radius between stations is further expanded. The transfer behavior triggered by dockless bicycle sharing has aroused many researchers’ interest. Given that this paper aims to measure travelers’ transfer tolerance to space interval, waiting interval and their perceived factors between stations, in which both dockless bike-sharing and walking are considered as feasible transfer mode. First, the transfer data collected by GPS application are uploaded to the server database for data mining and processing. Then, we propose a recursive fuzzy linear regression model to explore the functional relationships among passengers’ tolerances to distance, waiting time and their perceived factors. Results indicate that passengers who transfer by walk will be more sensitive to distance, while dockless bike-sharing users concern more about the time cost of finding available bike and the delay in traffic signals. Furthermore, our result also proves that pedestrian’s tolerance to environment is higher than cyclist who uses dockless bike-sharing system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkes SD, Marsden G, Shaheen SA, Cohen AP (2013) Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: evidence from Europe and North America. J Transp Geogr 31:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pal A, Zhang Y (2017) Free-floating bike sharing: solving real-life large-scale static rebalancing problems. Transp Res Part C 80:92–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. URL https://www.digitaltrends.com/outdoors/bluegogo-dockless-bike-share/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

  4. Campbell KB, Brakewood C (2017) Sharing riders: how bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York city. Transp Res Part A 100:264–282

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishman E (2016) Bikeshare: a review of recent literature. Transp Rev 36(1):92–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Assi W, Mahmoud MS, Habib KN (2017) Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation 3(44):589–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. URL http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/05/technology/startups/china-bike-sharing-global/index.html

  8. URL https://www.equities.com/news/bike-wars-how-dockless-cycles-flooded-china-and-are-heading-overseas

  9. Ceder A, Chowdhury S, Taghipouran N, Olsen J (2013) Modelling public-transport users’ behaviour at connection point. Transp Policy 27:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ampt E (2004) Understanding voluntary travel behaviour change. Transp Eng Aust 2(9):53–66

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sadhukhan S, Banerjee UK, Maitra B (2017) Rationality of fare increment for improvement of transfer facilities at metro stations: an experience in Kolkata. Transp Policy 58:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng JC, Ji CX, Gao L (2014) Research on walking time of transfer pedestrians in urban rail transit station. Appl Mech Mater 610:1053–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao X, Li Y, Xia H (2017) Behavior decision model for park-andride facilities utilization. Adv Mech Eng 7(9):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hadas Y, Ranjitkar P (2012) Modeling public-transit connectivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements. J Transp Geogr 22:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mamun SA, Lownes NE (2011) Measuring service gaps: accessibility-based transit need index. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2217:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panter JR, Jones A (2010) Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don’t we know? J Phys Act Health 7(4):551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugiyama T, Neuhaus M, Cole R, Giles-Corti B, Owen N (2012) Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(7):1275–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kathleen BW, Susan AC, Tiffany HR, Dianna DC, Janet EF (2015) Walking for transportation: what do U.S. adults think is a reasonable distance and time? J Phys Act Health 12(6):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asha W, Paul S (2007) Extent and correlates of walking in the USA. Transp Res Part D 12(8):548–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meddin R (2015) The bike-sharing world map http://www.bikesharingmap.com. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  21. DeMaio P (2009) Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. J Publ Transp 12(4):3

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin EW, Shaheen SA (2014) Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities. J Transp Geogr 41:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu WT, Li YL, Wang H (2016) Transit accessibility for commuters considering the demand elasticities of distance and transfer. J Transp Geogr 56:138–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang F, Tang Q (2013) Planning toward equal accessibility to services: a quadratic programming approach. Environ Plan B Plan Des 2(4):195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamareddinem AM, Hughes RL (2011) Towards a mathematical model for stability in pedestrian flows. Netw Heterog Media 3(6):465–483

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Choo S, Hwang KY (2011) Travel behavior analysis of bicycle users by type of trip chaining. J Transp Res 4(18):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters G (1994) Fuzzy sets and systems. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hojati M, Bector CR, Smimou K (2005) A simple method for computation of fuzzy linear regression. Eur J Oper Res 1(66):172–184

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Gan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ai, Y., Li, Z. & Gan, M. A solution to measure traveler’s transfer tolerance for walking mode and dockless bike-sharing mode. J Supercomput 75, 3140–3157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2211-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2211-7

Keywords

Navigation