Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rendezvous based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 August 2016

Abstract

In wireless sensor networks, the sensor nodes find the route towards the sink to transmit data. Data transmission happens either directly to the sink node or through the intermediate nodes. As the sensor node has limited energy, it is very important to develop efficient routing technique to prolong network life time. In this paper we proposed rendezvous-based routing protocol, which creates a rendezvous region in the middle of the network and constructs a tree within that region. There are two different modes of data transmission in the proposed protocol. In Method 1, the tree is directed towards the sink and the source node transmits the data to the sink via this tree, whereas in Method 2, the sink transmits its location to the tree, and the source node gets the sink’s location from the tree and transmits the data directly to the sink. The proposed protocol is validated through experiment and compared with the existing protocols using some metrics such as packet delivery ratio, energy consumption, end-to-end latency, network life time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang D, Li G, Zheng K, Ming X, Pan Z (2014) An energy-balanced routing method based on forward-aware factor for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10(1):766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bangash J, Abdullah A, Anisi M, Khan A (2014) A survey of routing protocols in wireless body sensor networks. Sensors 14(1):1322–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rault T, Bouabdallah A, Challal Y (2014) Energy efficiency in wire-less sensor networks: a top-down survey. Comput. Netw. 67(1):104–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puthal D, Sahoo B, Sharma S (2012) Dynamic model for efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. Int J Comput Sci Technol 3(1):623–628

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perillo M, Cheng Z (2005) An analysis of strategies for mitigating the sensor network hot spot problem. In: 2nd Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services (MobiQuitous 2005), pp 474–478

  6. Li J, Mohapatra P (2007) Analytical modeling and mitigation techniques for the energy hole problem in sensor networks. Pervasive Mob Comput 3(3):233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamida E, Cheliusi G (2008) A line-based data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2008), pp 2201–2205

  8. Kweon K, Ghim H, Hong J, Yooni H (2009) Grid-based energy-efficient routing from multiple sources to multiple mobile sinks in wireless sensor net-works. In: 4th International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing (ISWPC 2009), pp 1–5

  9. Shin J, Kim J, Park K, Park D (2005) Railroad: virtua infrastructure for data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In: 2nd ACM International Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Ubiquitous Net-works (PE-WASUN 2005), pp 168–174

  10. Tunca C, Isik S, Donmez M, Ersoy C (2014) Ring routing: an energy- efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with a mobile sink. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(11):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp B, Kung H (2000) GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp 243–254

  12. Xu Y, Heidemann J, Estrin D (2001) Geography informed energy conservation for ad-hoc routing. In: 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp 70–84

  13. Luo H, Ye F, Cheng J, Lu S, Zhang L (2005) TTDD: two-tier data dissemination in large-scale wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 11:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wendi B, Heinzelman A, Chandrakasan P, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 1(4):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Q, Hempstead M, Yang W (2006) A realistic power consumption model for wireless sensor network devices. In: IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON 2006), pp 286–295

  16. Broch J, Maltz D, Johnson D, Hu Y, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: 4th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp 85–97

  17. Khalid O, Khan S, Madani S, Hayat K, Khan M, Min-Allah N, Kolodziej J, Wang L, Zeadally S, Chen D (2013) Comparative study of trust and reputation systems for wireless sensor networks. Secur Commun Netw 6(6):669–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen D, Liu Z, Wang L, Dou M, Chen J, Li H (2013) Natural disaster monitoring with wireless sensor networks: a case study of data-intensive applications upon low-cost scalable systems. Mob Netw Appl 18(5):651–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jan M, Nanda P, He X, Liu R (2014) PASCCC: priority-based application-specific congestion control clustering protocol. Comput Netw 74:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jan M, Nanda P, He X (2013) Energy evaluation model for an improved centralized clustering hierarchical algorithm in WSN. In: WWIC, pp 154–167

  21. Jan M, Nanda P, He X, Liu R (2015) A sybil at-tack detection scheme for a centralized clustering-based hierarchical network. Trust-com/BigDataSE/ISPA, IEEE, vol 1, pp 318–325

  22. Jan M, Nanda P, He X, Liu R (2013) Enhancing lifetime and quality of data in cluster-based hierarchical routing protocol for wireless sensor network. In: 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, pp 1400–1407

  23. Puthal D (2012) Secure data collection and critical data transmission technique in mobile sink wireless sensor networks. M.Tech Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela

  24. Xing G, Wang T, Xie Z, Jia W (2008) Rendezvous planning in wireless sensor networks with mobile elements. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 7(12):1430–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Puthal D, Nepal S, Ranjan R, Chen J (2015) DPBSV-An efficient and secure scheme for big sensing data stream. Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA, IEEE, vol 1, pp 246–253

  26. Puthal D, Nepal S, Ranjan R, Chen J (2016) A dynamic prime number based efficient security mechanism for big sensing data streams. J Comput Syst Sci http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2016.02.005

  27. Puthal D, Nepal S, Ranjan R, Chen J (2015) A dynamic key length based approach for real-time security verification of big sensing data stream. In: Web information systems engineering-WISE 2015. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–108

  28. Puthal D, Nepal S, Ranjan R, Chen J (2016) DLSeF: a dynamic key length based efficient real-time security verification model for big data stream. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst

  29. Hamida E, Chelius G (2008) Strategies for data dissemination to mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 15(6):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ekici E, Gu Y, Bozdag D (2006) Mobility-based communication in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 44(7):56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma S (2016) On energy efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. PhD dissertation, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela

  32. Jan M, Nanda P, He X, Liu R (2016) A sybil attack detection scheme for a forest wildfire monitoring application. Future Gener Comput Syst

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is the part of PhD thesis work of Dr. Suraj Sharma, which is available online at NIT Rourkela ethesis [31]. Deepak Puthal contributed to this work during his Master,s study at NIT Rourkela.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIIT Bhubaneswar, Khurda, India

    Suraj Sharma

  2. CSIRO Data61, Sydney, Australia

    Deepak Puthal

  3. Department of CSE, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, India

    Sanjay Kumar Jena

  4. School of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Albert Y. Zomaya

  5. School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

    Rajiv Ranjan

  6. School of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China

    Rajiv Ranjan

Authors
  1. Suraj Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepak Puthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay Kumar Jena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert Y. Zomaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rajiv Ranjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suraj Sharma.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1851-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Puthal, D., Jena, S.K. et al. Rendezvous based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. J Supercomput 73, 1168–1188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1801-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1801-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation