Skip to main content
Log in

The philosophical significance of Alan Mackay’s theoretical discovery of quasicrystals

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dan Shechtman was the first to discover an actual quasicrystal (on April 8, 1982). He was, however, not the first to discover the pure possibility of this novel structure (the theoretical discovery), which had been excluded from the range of the possibilities of crystals (as it had been fixed by both theoretical and empirical means in the beginning of the twentieth century). Penrose and Mackay, in particular, had contributed to the discovery of the pure possibilities of quasicrystals quite some time before their actual discovery. These pure possibilities are mathematical–structural, and like purely mathematical entities, they do not exist spatiotemporally and causally, whereas actual quasicrystals exist only spatiotemporally and causally. The pure possibilities of quasicrystals do not depend on their actualities, and without them, these actualities would have been theoretically groundless, meaningless, and could not be correctly identified if at all. Hence, Mackay’s contribution to the meaning and theoretical basis of the discovery of actual quasicrystals is indispensable .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.wolffund.org.il/full.asp?id=17 (2004)

  2. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2012/PR17.12E.html

  3. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2013/press.html

  4. Gilead A (1999) Saving possibilities: an essay in philosophical psychology. Value inquiry book series, vol 80. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilead A (2003) Singularity and other possibilities: panenmentalist novelties. Value inquiry book series, vol 139. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilead A (2005) A possibilist metaphysical reconsideration of the identity of indiscernibles and free will. Metaphysica 6:25–51

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilead A (2009) Necessity and truthful fictions: panenmentalist observations. Value inquiry book series, vol 202. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilead A (2010) Actualist fallacies, from fax technology to lunar journeys. Philosophy and Literature 34:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilead A (2011) The privacy of the psychical. Value Inquiry Book Series, vol 233. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilead A (2013) Shechtman’s three question marks: impossibility, possibility, and quasicrystals. Found Chem 15:209–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilead A (2014) Pure possibilities and some striking scientific discoveries. Found Chem 16:149–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilead A (2014) We are not replicable: A challenge to Parfit’s view. Int Philos Q 54:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilead A (2014) Chain reactions, “impossible” reactions, and panenmentalist possibilities. Found Chem 16:201–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilead A (2015) Self-referentiality and two arguments refuting physicalism. Int Philos Q 55:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilead A (2015) Can brain Imaging breach our mental privacy? Rev Philos Psychol 6:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilead A (2015) Cruelty, singular individuality, and Peter the Great. Philosophia 43:337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilead A (2015) Neoteny and the playground of pure possibilities. Int J Humanit Soc Sci 5:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gilead A (2015) The twilight of determinism: at least in biophysical novelties. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1510/1510.04919.pdf

  19. Levine D, Steinhardt P (1984) Quasicrystals: a new class of ordered structures. Phys Rev Lett 53:2477–2480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lord EA, Mackay AL, Ranganathan S (2006) New geometries for new materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hargittai I (2010) Structures beyond crystals. J Mol Struct 976:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mackay AL (1982) Crystallography and the Penrose pattern. Phys A Theor Stat Phys 114:609–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Penrose R (1974) Role of aesthetics in pure and applied research. Bull Inst Math Appl 10:266

    Google Scholar 

  24. http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/prizes/buckley.cfm

  25. Shechtman D, Blech I, Gratias D, Cahn JW (1984) Metallic phase with long range orientational order and no translation symmetry. Phys Rev Lett 53:1951–1954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mackay AL (1997/8) Bending the rules. Lecture 1997/98, HLSI 24/02. http://met.iisc.ernet.in/~lord/webfiles/Alan/CVU12.pdf

  27. Mackay AL (1997) Lucretius or the philosophy of chemistry. Colloids Surf A 129–130:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mackay AL (1990) Crystals and fivefold symmetry. In: Hargittai I (ed) Quasicrystals, networks, and molecules of fivefold symmetry. VCH Publishers, New York, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mackay AL (2002) Generalized crystallography. Struct Chem 13:215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hargittai I (1997) Quasicrystals discovery: a personal account. Chem Intell 3:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hargittai I (2011) Dan Shechtman’s quasicrystal discovery in perspective. Isr J Chem 51:1145–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hargittai I (ed) (1992) Fivefold symmetry. World Scientific, Singapore, pp xv, 97, 193, 200

  33. Hargittai I (2011) “There is no such animal (אין חיה כזו)”—lessons of a discovery. Struct Chem 22:745–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hargittai I (2011) Stubbornness: “impossible” matter. In: Drive and curiosity: what fuels the passion for science. Prometheus Books, Amherst, pp 155–172

  35. Hargittai I, Hargittai M (2000) In our own image: personal symmetry in discovery. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp 8, 151–157

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amihud Gilead.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Alan L. Mackay on the occasion of his 90th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilead, A. The philosophical significance of Alan Mackay’s theoretical discovery of quasicrystals. Struct Chem 28, 249–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0742-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0742-9

Keywords

Navigation