Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paradigms and paradoxes: the conformation of the fundamental unit of hyaluronic acid

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geometries of the basic dimers of hyaluronan and chondroitin were compared by quantum chemical calculations. As is known the two systems differ in the relative orientation of one hydroxyl group. The basic unit of hyaluronan in its lowest-energy structure is some 20 kJ mol−1 lower in energy than the lowest-energy chondroitin unit. However, the interconversion between the two systems is prevented by a very high energy barrier. The introduction of aqueous medium somewhat changes the relative stabilities of various structures within the hyaluronan sets and chondroitin sets, respectively, but does not change the energy preference of hyaluronan over chondroitin though somewhat diminishes it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hargittai I, Hargittai M (2008) Struct Chem 19:697–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pogány P, Kovács A (2009) Carbohydr Res 344:1745–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krishnan R, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA (1980) J Chem Phys 72:650–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cossi M, Barone V, Cammi R, Tomasi J (1996) Chem Phys Lett 255:327–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cammi R, Mennucci B, Tomasi J (2000) J Phys Chem A 104:5631–5637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Barone V (2002) J Chem Phys 117:43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03. Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoltán Varga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varga, Z., Hargittai, I. Paradigms and paradoxes: the conformation of the fundamental unit of hyaluronic acid. Struct Chem 21, 1211–1214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-010-9662-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-010-9662-2

Keywords

Navigation