Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic definition of local criterion for brittle fracture under complex thermomechanical loading

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Abstract

The new local criterion for brittle fracture in probabilistic definition, which was used by the authors earlier for the KIc(T) prediction, is modified for the case of non-isothermal non-monotonic loading. An approach is put forward which allows predicting the brittle fracture probability for cracked elements under complex thermomechanical loading typical, for example, of the case of emergency cooldown of a reactor pressure vessel. The approach has been verified by comparing the calculated and experimental data of assessment of the influence of various thermomechanical pre-loading modes on the fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel steels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. PNAÉ G-7-002-86. Strength Analysis Code for Equipment and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Plants [in Russian], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1989).

  2. Guidance on the Reactor Pressure Vessel PTS Assessment for WWER Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA, WWER-SC-157 (1996).

  3. B. Z. Margolin, E. Yu. Rivkin, G. P. Karzov, et al., “New approaches for evaluation of brittle strength of reactor pressure vessels,” in: Proc. VIth Int. Conf. Material Issues in Design, Manufacturing, and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Equipment (St. Petersburg, Russia, 19–23 June 2000) (2000), 1, pp. 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Masson, L. Nicolas, and D. Moinereau,“RPV structural integrity assessment during a PTS event: application of extended Beremin model consistent with WPS test results,” in: Proc. PVP-2002 (Vancouver, Canada, 5–9 August 2002), 443, No.1, 51–56 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. R. Wilshaw, C. A. Rau, and A. S. Tetelman,“A general model to predict the elastic distribution and fracture strength of notched bars in plane strain bending,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 1, 191–211 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. O. Ritchie, J. F. Knott, and J. R. Rice,“On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 21, 395–410 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. A. Curry,“A micromechanistic approach to the warm pre-stressing of ferritic steels,” Int. J. Fract., 17, 335–342 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. G. Chell, “The effects of sub-critical crack growth on fracture behavior of cracked ferritic steels after warm prestressing,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 9, 259–274 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. M. Beremin, “A local criterion for cleavage fracture for a nuclear pressure vessels steels,” Met. Trans., 14A, 2277–2287 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Proc. EUROMECH-MECAMAT’96. 1st European Mechanics of Materials Conference on Local Approach to Fracture, Fontainebleau, France, 9–11 Sept. (1996).

  11. G. R. Odette and M. Y. He, “A cleavage toughness master curve model,” J. Nucl. Mat., 283-287, 120–127 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. S. Weisner and M. R. Goldthorpe, “The effect of temperature and specimen geometry on the parameters of the “Local approach” to cleavage fracture,” J. de Phys. IV, 295–304 (1996).

  13. B. Z. Margolin, V. A. Shvetsova, and A. G. Gulenko,“Comparison of the Master Curve and Russian Approaches as applied to WWER RPV steels,” in: Use and Applications of the Master Curve for Determining Fracture Toughness (Workshop MASC 2002), Helsinki-Stockholm (2002), pp. 12.1–12.22.

  14. H. Kordisch, R. Boschen, J. G. Blauel, et al., “Experimental and numerical investigations of the warm-prestressing (WPS) effect considering different paths,” Nucl. Eng. Design, 198, 89–96 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Stockl, R. Boschen, W. Schmitt, et al., “Quantification of the warm prestressing effect in a shape welded 10MnMoNi5-5 material,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 67, 119–137 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Z. Margolin and V. A. Shvetsova, “Brittle fracture criterion: structural-mechanical approach,” Probl. Prochn., No. 2, 3–16 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Z. Margolin, V. A. Shvetsova, and G. P. Karzov, “Brittle fracture of nuclear pressure vessel steels. Part I. Local criterion for cleavage fracture,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 72, 73–87 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Z. Margolin, A. G. Gulenko, and V. A. Shvetsova, “Probabilistic model for fracture toughness prediction based on the new local fracture criteria,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 75, 307–320 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Z. Margolin, A. G. Gulenko, and V. A. Shvetsova, “Improved probabilistic model for fracture toughness prediction based for nuclear pressure vessel steels,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 75, 843-855 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Z. Margolin, V. A. Shvetsova, G. P. Karzov, et al., “Application of local approach concept of cleavage fracture to VVER materials,” in: Proc. PVP-2002 (Vancouver, Canada, 5–9 August 2002), 437, 113–120 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Z. Margolin, V. I. Kostylev, and A. I. Minkin, “The effect of ductile crack growth on the temperature dependence for a RPV steel with various degrees of embrittlement,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 80, 285–296 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Z. Margolin, V. A. Shvetsova, A. G. Gulenko, et al., “Fracture toughness predictions for a reactor pressure vessel steel in the initial and highly embrittled states with the Master Curve approach and a probabilistic model,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 79, 219–231 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. M. Kachalov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Plasticity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Kishimoto, S. Aoki, and M. Sakata, “On the path independent integral,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 13, 841–850 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. A. Korn and T. M. Korn, Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, San Francisco, London (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. V. Pokrovskii, V. T. Troshchenko, V. G. Kaplunenko, et al., “A promising method for enhancing resistance of pressure vessels to brittle fracture,” Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 58, 9–24 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. V. Pokrovskii and V. T. Troshchenko, “Assessment of brittle-fracture resistance of reactor steels after thermomechanical loading under different conditions and stability of the positive effect of warm prestressing,” in: Proc. NATO Advanced Research Workshop (ARW): Scientific Fundamentals for the Life Time Extension of Reactor Pressure Vessels, Kiev (2002), pp. 110–125.

  29. A. P. Gusenkov, Strength under Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Low-Cycle Loading [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 1, pp. 24–42, January–February, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Margolin, B.Z., Kostylev, V.I. & Keim, E. Probabilistic definition of local criterion for brittle fracture under complex thermomechanical loading. Strength Mater 37, 16–29 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-005-0013-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-005-0013-2

Keywords

Navigation