Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Principal autonomy-support buffers the effect of stress on teachers’ positive well-being: a cross-sectional study during the pandemic

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aside from the personal and health difficulties brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers also faced tremendous work-related challenges that led to increased stress levels and poorer well-being. This is especially true for resource-constrained schools in an Eastern context. The present study aimed to examine the moderating role of principal autonomy-support on the relationship between stress and teacher well-being during the early stages of the pandemic. Data was collected from 1150 K-12 teachers in the Philippines and hierarchical multiple regression was used to assess the moderating effect of principal autonomy-support on the relationship between stress and well-being. Findings show that stress was negatively associated with emotional, psychological, and social well-being and principal autonomy-support moderated the link between stress and psychological well-being. Johnson-Neyman plots and simple slopes analyses demonstrated that the negative relationship between stress and psychological well-being is more pronounced for teachers who reported lower autonomy-support from principals and weaker for those who reported higher principal autonomy-support. The study highlights the crucial role of autonomy-supportive school leadership in mitigating the adverse effects of stress on teachers’ well-being, particularly in the challenging backdrop of a pandemic. The findings further corroborate the relevance of autonomy-support on well-being not only in the Western perspective but specifically within an Eastern, lower-middle-income context. Key discussions and research implications for improving teacher well-being are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Norman B. Mendoza PhD, has been supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme 2022/2023, Hong Kong SAR, China. Grant Number: PDFS 2223-8H07.

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Norman B. Mendoza or John Ian Wilzon T. Dizon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

The study complied with the ethics requirements from the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Guidelines.

Informed consent

Informed consent was sought from all participants and the consent form contained the details of their participation, including the nature and objectives of the study, their rights as participants, and data confidentiality.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendoza, N.B., Dizon, J.I.W.T. Principal autonomy-support buffers the effect of stress on teachers’ positive well-being: a cross-sectional study during the pandemic. Soc Psychol Educ 27, 23–45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09834-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09834-7

Keywords

Navigation