Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Parent involvement, expectancy values, and STEM outcomes among underrepresented adolescents

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Racial and ethnic achievement gaps contribute to the lack of underrepresented minorities in STEM-related careers. This research is grounded in the expectancy-value model of achievement motivation which posits that motivation is influenced by social-cognitive variables such as self-efficacy and beliefs about the usefulness or utility of the task. These social-cognitive variables (self-beliefs and task beliefs), in turn, are influenced by numerous ecological factors such as parental involvement. Parent involvement can promote children’s self-efficacy and task beliefs which is important for STEM interest and persistence. This study utilized data from the High School Longitudinal Study: 2009 (HLS: 2009) to examine links among parent involvement and underrepresented students’ STEM self-efficacy, utility, interest and achievement. Concurrent and longitudinal models conducted in MPlus tested whether parent involvement in 9th grade predicted STEM interest and achievement directly and indirectly via self-efficacy and utility. Concurrent models showed that parent involvement in STEM was significantly related to adolescents’ STEM self-efficacy which in turn was significantly related to STEM interest and achievement. Longitudinal models showed that parents’ STEM involvement in 9th grade predicted adolescents’ STEM efficacy in 11th grade which in turn predicted adolescents’ cumulative GPA in STEM courses. Parent involvement in STEM was more strongly and consistently linked to self-efficacy than to utility. These results suggest that parent involvement in STEM helps adolescents to feel more confident in their STEM abilities but it does not necessarily contribute to adolescents’ STEM utility values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarnani, R. K., Garcia, P. R. J. M., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Bordia, S. (2016). Do you think I’m worth it? The self-verifying role of parental engagement in career adaptability and career persistence among STEM students. Journal of Career Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C., Huang, K.-T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2017). Pressurizing the STEM pipeline: An expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ STEM attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9685-1.

  • Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballo, R. (2004). From barrios to Yale: The role of parenting strategies in Latino families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986304264572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. P. (2005). The rewards of parent participation. Educational leadership, 62(6), 38–42.

  • Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community Programs to Promote Youth Development/Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In. A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Mineo, C. C., & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98, 486–493. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25766726

  • Fenechel, M. & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: learning science in informal environments. National Academies Press.

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, C. A., Grande, M. R., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2021). The role of utility value in promoting interest development. Motivation Science, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, C. A., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2019). Promoting persistence in the biological and medical sciences: An expectancy-value approach to intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1462–1477. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N. E., Castellino, D. R., Lansford, J. E., Nowlin, P., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2004). Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child Development, 75(5), 1491–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00753.x.

  • Howard, N. R., Howard, K. E., Busse, R. T., & Hunt, C. (2019). Let’s talk: An examination of parental involvement as a predictor of STEM achievement in math for high school girls. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919877933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. C., & Reynolds, R. (2008). Examining parent involvement in reversing the underachievement of African American students in middle-class schools. Educational Foundations, 22, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., Cui, J., Smith, M., Mann, F. B., Barmer, A. & Dilig, R. (2020). The condition of education 2020. (NCES 2020–144). U.S. department of education. Washington D.C.: National center for education statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020144

  • James, A. G., Rudy, D., & Dotterer, A. (2019). Longitudinal examination of relations between school-and home-based parent involvement and GPA across ethnic groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(11), 3000–3010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, T. E., Thomas, N. G., & Trautmann, M. (2003). Intervention program to keep girls in the science pipeline: Outcome differences by ethnic status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeynes, W. H. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Simpkins, S. D., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Individuals’ math and science motivation and their subsequent STEM choices and achievement in high school and college: A longitudinal study of gender and college generation status differences. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2137–2151. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodl, K. M., Michael, A., Malanchuk, O., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2001). Parents’ role in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development, 72(4), 1247–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Century, J., Blackwell, C., Holt, S., Ibrahim, A., & Loo, S. (2016). The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0054-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy–value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1540–1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C. (2011). More similarities than differences in contemporary theories of social development?: A plea for theory bridging. In J. B. Benson (Ed.). Advances in child development and behavior, (pp. 337–378). San Diego: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386491-8.00009-8

  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, S. L. (2016). Psychology of working narratives of STEM career exploration for non-dominant youth. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 976–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9646-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mau, W. C. J. (2016). Characteristics of US students that pursued a STEM major and factors that predicted their persistence in degree completion. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. J., Owens, W., Ellenbogen, K., Erduran, S., & Dunlosky, J. (2019). Measuring informal STEM learning supports across contexts and time. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0195-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. In M. Fenichel & H. A. Schweingruber (Eds.), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Phelps, L. A., Camburn, E. M., & Min, S. (2018). Choosing STEM college majors: Exploring the role of pre-college engineering courses. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Parents’ socializing behavior and children’s participation in math, science, and computer out-of-school activities. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0901_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D., & Garcia, K. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among Latino and Caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalls, C. (2009). African American adolescent engagement in the classroom and beyond: The roles of mother’s racial socialization and democratic-involved parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9316-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021, April 9). Employment in STEM occupations. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm

  • Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.-T., Degol, J., & Ye, F. (2015). Math achievement is important, but task values are critical, too: Examining the intellectual and motivational factors leading to gender disparities in STEM careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00036.

  • Wang, M. T., Ye, F., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Who chooses STEM careers? Using a relative cognitive strength and interest model to predict careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1805–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Utah State University, 2905 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322, USA

    Aryn M. Dotterer

Authors
  1. Aryn M. Dotterer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aryn M. Dotterer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dotterer, A.M. Parent involvement, expectancy values, and STEM outcomes among underrepresented adolescents. Soc Psychol Educ 25, 113–127 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09677-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09677-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation