Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expectancy of success, subjective task-value, and message frame in the appraisal of value-promoting messages made prior to a high-stakes examination

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has examined how subjective task-value and expectancy of success influence the appraisal of value-promoting messages used by teachers prior to high-stakes examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether message-frame (gain or loss-framed messages) also influences the appraisal of value-promoting messages. Two hundred and fifty-two participants in Years 12 and 13 read vignettes of fictional students who were high or low in subjective-task value, and expectancy of success, and asked to imagine how that student would appraise either a gain or loss-framed message. A challenge appraisal followed vignettes with high subjective task-value and high expectancy of success whereas a threat appraisal followed vignettes with high subjective task-value and low expectancy of success. A loss-framed message resulted in a stronger threat appraisal, and a gain-framed message in a greater disregarding appraisal for the vignette with high subjective task-value and high expectancy of success. Value-promoting messages can be appraised in different ways depending on combinations of intrapersonal (subjective task-value and expectancy of success) and interpersonal (message-frame) influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205–227). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barter, C., & Renold, E. (2000). ‘I wanna tell you a story’: Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(4), 307–323. doi:10.1080/13645570050178594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connly, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32–47. doi:10.1037/a0026042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., O’Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task-values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 239–247). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21(1), 4–14. doi:10.1080/10615800701740457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (2011). Stress, health, and coping: Synthesis, commentary, and future directions. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 453–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., et al. (2014). “My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, E. K., Lapinksi, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P. J. (2011). Positive emotion in sport performance: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(1), 50–69. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2011.560955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijen, C., Jones, M. C., McCarthy, P. J., Sheffield, D., & Allen, M. S. (2013). Cognitive and affective components of challenge and threat states. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(8), 847–855. doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.753157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 103–109. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, L., Crafter, S., deAbreu, G., & Cline, T. (2013). The problem of interpretation in vignette methodology with young people. Qualitative Research, 12(6), 702–714. doi:10.1177/1468794112439003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17(3), 287–316. doi:10.1080/10615800412331303847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617. doi:10.1111/bjso.12006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Allen, M. (2006). Test anxiety. Academic self-efficacy and study skills: A meta-analytic review. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom interaction and instructional processes: A meta-analytic review (pp. 99–111). Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W. (2009). Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 391–411. doi:10.1080/01411920802044404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2011). Fear appeals in the primary classroom: Effects on test anxiety and test grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 580–584. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2012). Do highly test anxious pupils respond differentially to fear appeals made prior to a test? Research in Education, 88(2), 1–10. doi:10.7227/RIE.88.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., Connors, E., Woods, K. A., & Nicholson, L. J. (2012). Stress and anxiety surrounding the Key Stage 2 Standard Assessment Tests in English schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(4), 189–302. doi:10.1080/02643944.2012.688063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., Nicholson, L. J., Nakhla, G., Reece, M., Porter, B., & Liversidge, A. (2016). Fear appeals prior to a high-stakes examination can have a positive or negative impact on engagement depending on how the message is appraised. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44–45, 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2014a). Fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes examination: What makes them threatening? Learning and Individual Differences, 36(1), 145–151. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2014b). The scare tactic: Messages which contain fear appeals prior to a high-stakes test predict lower self-determined motivation and exam scores. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 503–516. doi:10.1037/spq0000048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2014). The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.963028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2015). Fear appeals used prior high-stakes examinations: Why are they appraised as threatening and do they impact on subjective task-value? Learning and Instruction, 40(1), 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2009). The development and validation of the Teachers Use of Fear Appeals Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 643–661. doi:10.1348/000709909X426130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2012). Fear and efficacy appeals in the classroom: the secondary teachers’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 355–372. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.659845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011a). Classroom fear appeals and examination performance: Facilitating or debilitating outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 227–232. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011b). Teachers’ use of fear appeals in the Mathematics classroom: Worrying or motivating students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 456–474. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2012). Are low competence beliefs always associated with high test anxiety? The mediating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 207–224. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02021.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2014). Subjective value and academic self-efficacy: The appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 229–248. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9249-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5(2), 141–149. doi:10.1177/1754073912469591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., & Rothman, A. J. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20(4), 256–266. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioural inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(3), 433–467. doi:10.1177/0093650207302787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, W. H., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E., & Perea, E. F. (2011). Feeling good: Autonomic system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion, 11(6), 1369–1378. doi:10.1037/a0024278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprinkle, R., Hunt, S., Simonds, C., & Comadena, M. (2006). Fear in the classroom: An examination of teachers’ use of fear appeals and students learning outcomes. Communication Education, 55(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/03634520600879170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., Cabdel, M. J. J. M., & De Vries, H. (2010a). Distinct pathways to persuasion: The role of affect in message-framing effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1261–1276. doi:10.1002/ejsp.722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., & De Vries, H. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 800–809. doi:10.1002/ejsp.496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., & De Vries, H. (2010b). Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin cancer detection. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 339–349. doi:10.1080/08870440802530798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werrij, M. Q., Ruiter, R. A., Van’t Riet, J., & De Vries, H. (2010). Self-efficacy as a potential moderator of the effects of framed health messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 199–207. doi:10.1177/1359105310374779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Academic self-efficacy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In A. Wigfield & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55–77). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anya Zarod, Alistair Burr and Hannah Wilkinson for their help in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Putwain.

Appendix

Appendix

  • Vignette A: Sarah is a hard working Year 11 student who is good at maths. She finds the work done in lessons challenging, but usually does very well. Sarah believes that maths is an important subject to do well in. She wants to go to college to study A levels and knows she must get at least a pass in GCSE maths. She also knows that maths is a useful skill to have in daily life to help with things like bills.

  • Vignette B: James wants to learn a trade when he leaves school and get an apprenticeship as a plumber or plasterer. He knows that you need to know figures for this type of work, buying building materials and measuring up rooms, but thinks that GCSE maths isn’t related to these kinds of calculations. Despite this, James is good at maths and expects to get at least a pass in GCSE maths.

  • Vignette C: Jade hasn’t been very good at maths since primary school. When she tries to do maths, the numbers just jumble up and she can’t think clearly. She didn’t do very well in the Year 10 maths exam and thinks that she might not pass. Jade wants to become a hairdresser and has been offered a place at college, but has to get at least a grade C to get into college. She also thinks that GCSE maths will help her in her daily life with things like bills and if she ever opens her own salon.

  • Vignette D: Jerome doesn’t think GCSE maths is important. When he finishes school he is going to work for the family restaurant and knows that he will do this whatever grade he gets in GCSE maths. His brother didn’t pass GCSE maths and he doesn’t seem to have any problems working in the restaurant. Jerome has never been good at maths and doesn’t really try very hard in maths lessons. He is expects to fail GCSE maths.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Putwain, D.W., Symes, W. Expectancy of success, subjective task-value, and message frame in the appraisal of value-promoting messages made prior to a high-stakes examination. Soc Psychol Educ 19, 325–343 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9337-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9337-y

Keywords

Navigation