Skip to main content
Log in

“I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated differences in university students’ academic entitlement (AE) by demographic group (sex, college class, college generational status) as well as AE’s relationship with self-efficacy for college coursework and social networking. It also investigated predictors of AE in first-generation (FG) students and continuing-generation (CG) students. Participants were 313 undergraduates at a south-central U.S. university. Males reported significantly greater AE than females. No differences in AE were found by college class or generational status. AE was significantly correlated with college course self-efficacy and social network use. College course self-efficacy, sex, and social network use predicted AE in CG students; however, in FG students, AE was predicted by college course self-efficacy alone. Implications for future research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achacoso, M. V. (2002). “What do you mean my grade is not an A?” An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/2486.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rev/.

  • Billson, J. M., & Terry, M. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first generation students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of American Colleges, Denver, Colorado.

  • Bong M., Skaalvik E. M. (2003) Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?. Educational Psychology Review 15(1): 1–40. doi:1040-726X/03/0300-0001/0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffardi L., Campbell W. (2008) Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 34(10): 1303–1314. doi:10.1177/0146167208320061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylsma W. H., Major B. (1992) Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement. Psychology of Women Quarterly 16: 193–200. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00249.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell W. K., Bonacci A. M., Shelton J., Exline J. J., Bushman B. J. (2004) Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment 83(1): 29–45. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowning K., Campbell N. J. (2009) Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students’ externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(4): 982–997. doi:10.1037/a0016351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choy S. P. (2001) Access and persistence: Findings from 10 years of longitudinal research on students. American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciani K. D., Summers J. J., Easter M. A. (2008) Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 169(4): 332–344. doi:10.3200/GNTP.169.4.332-344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Allegro, M. L., & Kerns, S. (2010–2011) Is there such a thing as too much of a good thing when it comes to education? Reexamining first generation student success. Journal of College Student Retention, 12(3), 293–317. doi:10.2190/CS.12.3.c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais S., Curtis J. (1997) Gender differences in pay histories and views on pay entitlement among university students. Sex Roles 37(9/10): 623–642. doi:10.1007/BF02936332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S., & Curtis, J. (2001). Gender and perceived income entitlement among full-time workers: Analyses for Canadian national samples, 1984 and 1994. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 157–168. Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01973533.asp.

  • DeWitz S., Woolsey M., Walsh W. (2009) College student retention: An exploration of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and purpose in life among college students. Journal of College Student Development 50(1): 19–34. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & O’Brien, C. (2006). Straight from the source: What works for first-generation college students. Pell Institute for Study of Opportunity in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.pellinstitute.org/.

  • Gibbons, M. M., & Borders, L. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 58, 194–208. Retrieved from http://www.ncda.org/.

  • Greenberger E., Lessard J., Chen C., Farraggia S. P. (2008) Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth Adolescence 37: 1193–1204. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9284-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2001). Does entitlement mediate the link between masculinity and rape-related variables? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(1), 39–50. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/cou/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue M., Yoder J., Singleton S. (2007) The gender wage gap: An explanation of men’s elevated wage entitlement. Sex Roles 56(9/10): 573–579. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9199-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishitani T. T. (2006) Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education 77(5): 861–885. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., Gardner, P. D., & Sullivan, L. A. (1992). Explaining gender differences in self-pay expectations: Social comparison standards and perceptions of fair pay. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 651–663. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl/index.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayson, S. (2009, August 25). Are students today more narcissistic? USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/.

  • Landesman, C. (2010, May 17). The age of narcissism. Daily Mail (London). Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.

  • LaPorta, L. D. (2009, November). Twitter and Youtube: Unexpected consequences of the self-esteem movement? Psychiatric Times, 26(11), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/.

  • Lippmann S., Bulanda R. E., Wagenaar T. C. (2009) Student entitlement: Issues and strategies for confronting entitlement in the classroom and beyond. College Teaching 57(4): 197–204. doi:10.3200/CTCH.57.4.197-204

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, P. J. (2000). ERIC review: What community colleges should do to assist first generation students. Community College Review, 28(3), 75–87. Retrieved from http://crw.sagepub.com/.

  • Mehdizadeh S. (2010) Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 13(4): 357–364. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. G., & Hicks, T. (2006). Academic characteristics among first-generation and non-first-generation college students. College Quarterly, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.collegequarterly.ca/.

  • Nunez, A., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/.

  • Pajares F. (1997) Current directions in self-efficacy research. In: Maehr M., Pintrich P. R. (eds) Advances in motivation and achievement. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 276–300. Retrieved from http://www.ohiostatepress.org/Journals/JHE/jhemain.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prospero M., Vohra-Gupta S. (2007) First-generation college students: Motivation, integration, and academic achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 31: 963– 975. doi:10.1080/10668920600902051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor L., Miller J., Gaughan E. (2008) A comparison of the psychological entitlement scale and the narcissistic personality inventory’s entitlement scale: Relations with general personality traits and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment 90(5): 517–520. doi:10.1080/00223890802248893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton-Jackson J., Jackson D., Reinhardt J. (2010) Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we’re selling?. Innovative Higher Education 35: 343–358. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9151-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg V. S., O’Brien K., Villareal P., Kennel R., Davis B. (1993) Self-efficacy of Hispanic college students: Validation of the college self-efficacy instrument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15(1): 80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg V. S., Villarreal P. (1997) Examination of self-efficacy, social support, and stress as predictors of psychological and physical distress among Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 19(2): 182–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, A. (2010, May 8). Meek-less in Twitverse: Twitter and its ilk have given rise to a generation that believes its every utterance ought to be shared with the world. The Business Times Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.thebusinesstimes.com.sg..

  • Terezini, P. T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/rhej.html.

  • Twenge J. M. (2006) Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge J. M., Campbell W. K. (2009) The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Application for grants under the student support services program. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Utz, S., & Kramer, N. (2009). The privacy paradox on social networking sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), article 2. Retrieved from http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/index.php.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie S. Boswell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boswell, S.S. “I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables. Soc Psychol Educ 15, 353–365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9184-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9184-4

Keywords

Navigation