Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Creating Public Spaces and Practiced Places for Democracy, Discourse, and the Emergence of Civil Society

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A question before us in the process of creating public spaces and practiced places for democracy and civil society concerns what democracy means for civil society and what civil society means for democratization of the national state in a globalizing world? In this article the author discusses the meaning of democracy and civil society, and the relation each shares. Following, the author examines the nature of space through the work of [Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. (Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith). Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, Mass] drawing on the work of the French theorist to construct a tripartite model of public space. As well, the author examines the notion of creating practiced places for democracy civil society, drawing on the work of [de Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley] to understand the interplay of discourse in reconfiguring space as a practiced place. The author also examines social space and power-geometry as it relates to creating public spaces and practiced places for democracy and civil society. In the final section, the author provides reflections on the work that lies ahead for democratization of the nation-state and the emergence of democratic civil society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the significance of space in society see, e.g., Lefebvre (1991 [1974]); Gregory and Urry (1985); Massey (1994).

  2. On the meaning of public space see, e.g., Low and Smith 2006; Habermas 2001.

  3. On the meaning of practiced places, see, e.g., de Certeau 1984; Etlin 1997; Massey 1995b.

References

  • Benko G, Strohmayer U (1997) Space and social theory: interpreting modernity and postmodernity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk A (2000) Democratizing civil society in Latin America. J Democr 11(3):152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy M (ed) (2000) Global ethnography: forces, connections and imaginations in a postmodern world. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrschmidt J (2002) Multiple agoras: Local and regional environmental policies between globalization and European pathways of transformation. Innov 15(3):193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberly DE (1998) America’s promise: civil society and the renewal of American culture. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberly DE (2000) The meaning, origins, and applications of civil society. In: Eberly DE (ed) The essential civil society reader: classic essays in the American civil society debate. Rowman & Littlefield, New York pp 329

    Google Scholar 

  • Etlin RA (1997) Space, stone, and spirit: the meaning of place. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory D, Urry J (eds) (1985) Social relations and spatial structures. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi L, Crowley J, Ney S (2001) Surveying the European public space—a political and research agenda. Innov: Eur J Soc Sci 14(1):73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2001) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler R (1988) Nationalism and the politics of culture in Quebec. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (1969) Explanation in geography. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (1989) The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Held D (1989) Political theory and the modern state. Cambridge Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Held D (2000) Regulating globalization? The reinvention of politics. Int Sociol 15(2):394–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor M (2000) Civilising globalisation? The implications of the “battle of Seattle”. Millennium: J Int Relat 29(1):105–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor M, Anheier H, Glasius M (2003) Global civil society. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane J (1988) Democracy and civil society. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1978) De l’État: Les Contrdicions de l’État Moderne, Vol. 4. Union Générale d’Éditions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1981) The critique of everyday life, vol 3: From modernity towards a metaphilosophy of daily life. Verso, London

  • Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. (Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith). Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, Mass

  • Lipschütz, R (1992) Reconstructing world politics: the emergence of global civil society. Millennium: J Int Relat 21(3):389–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low M (1997) Representation unbound: globalization and democracy. In: Cox K (ed) Spaces of globalization. Guildford Press, New York pp 240–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Low S, Smith N (eds) (2006) The politics of public space. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff J (1999) Globalization and the future of democracy. J World–Systems Res V(2):277–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: Bird J, Curtis B, Putnam T, Robertson G, Tickner L (eds), Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change. Routledge, London pp 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1994) Space, place and gender. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1995a) Thinking radical democracy spatially. Environ Plan D 13 283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1995b) The conceptualization of place. In: Massey D, Jess P (eds), A place in the world? Places, cultures and globalization. Oxford University Press/Open University, Oxford, pp 45–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1999) Imagining globalization: power-geometries of time-space. In: Brahm A, Hickman MJ, Mac an Ghaill M (eds), Global futures, migration, environment and globalization. Macmillan, Basingstoke pp 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler 86B(1):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumford C (2001) Social spaces beyond civil society: European integration, globalization and the sociology of European society. Innov: Eur J Soc Sci 14(3):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said E (1993) Culture and imperalism. Chatto and Windus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte JA (2002) What is globalization? The definitional issue––again. CSGR Working Paper No. 109/02. UK: University of Warwick

  • Walzer M (1995) The concept of civil society. In: Walzer M (ed) Toward a global civil society. Berhahan Books, Providence, RI pp 8–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Jenlink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenlink, P.M. Creating Public Spaces and Practiced Places for Democracy, Discourse, and the Emergence of Civil Society. Syst Pract Act Res 20, 429–440 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9077-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9077-1

Keywords

Navigation