Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetics in Russia: looking toward the twenty-first century

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Processes observable in contemporary Russian aesthetics are the result of the transformation of the very notion of aesthetics following the emergence of a number of new “aesthetic” objects as well as ways of describing them. The scope of questions studied by aesthetics in its broader interpretation concerns not just professional philosophers in academic institutions, but also researchers whose works formally belong to different disciplines, some close to, some quite distant from aesthetics. The present article offers an overview of contemporary aesthetic theory as well as a general prognostic analysis of the latest trends in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The notion of implicit aesthetics has been elaborated on by V. V. Bychkov, who interprets it as a “semi-theoretical freeform conceptualization of the aesthetic experience from within other disciplines such as philosophy, rhetoric, philology, theology, etc.” (Bychkov and Bychkov 2010).

  2. Workerism (or Operaismo) is a trend in contemporary Marxism that emerged in Italy in the 1960s. The research of Workerists and Post-Workerists focus on the analysis of new types of labour (“precarity” and “immaterial labour” as described by M. Hardt and A. Negri and the “virtuosity” of P. Virno), and the forms of social and political existence in the post-Industrialist era. The most prominent representatives of post-Workerism are M. Hardt, A. Negri, P. Virno, and M. Lazzarato. In general, a growing interest in Marxism can be explained by the emerging need for a socially-oriented critical theory.

  3. The Lifshits Institute project, founded as a social movement in 1994 by Dmitry Gutov and Konstantin Bokhorov, needs to be mentioned in this respect. One of its initial goals was the rediscovery of the phenomenon of Soviet Marxism and finding a means of bringing together artists and theoreticians sharing Communist views on art. Apart from work with the archive of Lifshits, the Institute’s activities include the organisation of exhibitions and public discussion events.

References

  • Aronson, O. V. (2002). Бoгeмa: Oпыт cooбщecтвa. Haбpocoк к филocoфии acoциaльнocти. (Bohemia: The Experience of Community. Sketches for the Philosophy of Asociality). Moscow: Pragmatika kultury.

  • Aronson, O. V. (2003). Meтaкинo. (Meta-Cinema). Moscow: Ad Marginem.

  • Aronson, O. V. (2007). Кoммyникaтивный oбpaз (Кинo. Литepaтypa. Филocoфия). (The Communicative Image: Cinema. Literature. Philosophy). Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie.

  • Arslanov, V. G. (1983). Mиф o cмepти иcкyccтвa: Эcтeтичecкиe идeи Фpaнкфypтcкoй шкoлы oт Бeньяминa дo «нoвыx лeвыx». (The Myth of the Death of Art: The Aesthetic Ideas of the Frankfurt School—from Benjamin to the New Left). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

  • Arslanov, V. G. (2007). Пocтмoдepнизм и pyccкий «тpeтий пyть». Tertium datur poccийcкoй кyльтypы XX вeкa. (Postmodernism and the Russian “Third Way”: The Tertium Datur of Russian Culture in the Twentieth Century). Moscow: Kulturnaya revolutsiya.

  • Asse, E. V. (1997). Пocлe пpocтpaнcтвa. Фpaгмeнты пpoтoкoлoв apxитeктypныx иcпытaний (Beyond Space. Fragments of Records of Architectural Trials). Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 16, 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaev, G. A. (2008). Cтaнoвлeниe эcтeтичecкoй тeopии: Meтoдoлoгичecкиe oчepки. (The Nascence of the Aesthetic Theory: Methodological Essays). Moscow: SIAS.

  • Bogomolov, Yu. A. (Ed.). (2011, 2013). Bыcoкoe и низкoe в xyдoжecтвeннoй кyльтype. (The High and the Low in Artistic Culture). In 2 vol. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.

  • Borev, Yu. B. (2002). Эcтeтикa. (Aesthetics). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (1991). Maлaя иcтopия визaнтийcкoй эcтeтики. (A Concise History of Byzantine Aesthetics). Kiev: Put k istine.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (1992). Pyccкaя cpeднeвeкoвaя эcтeтикa XIXVII вeкa. (Mediaeval Russian Aesthetics from the Eleventh to the Seventeenth Centuries). Moscow: Mysl.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (Ed.) (2003). Лeкcикoн нoнклaccики. Xyдoжecтвeннo-эcтeтичecкaя кyльтypa XX вeкa. (The Lexicon of the Non-Classic. Arts and Aesthetics in the Culture of the twentieth Century). Moscow: ROSSPEN.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2007a). 2000 лeт xpиcтиaнcкoй кyльтypы sub specie aesthetica. (Two Thousand Years of Christian Culture sub Specie Aesthetica). In 2 vol. Moscow: MBA Publications.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2007b). Pyccкaя тeypгичecкaя эcтeтикa. (Russian Theurgic Aesthetics). Moscow: Ladomir.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2008). Фeнoмeн икoны: Иcтopия. Бoгocлoвиe. Эcтeтикa. Иcкyccтвo. (The Phenomenon of the Icon: History. Theology. Aesthetics. Art). Moscow: Ladomir.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2010). Эcтeтичecкaя aypa бытия: Coвpeмeннaя эcтeтикa кaк нayкa и филocoфия иcкyccтвa. (The Aesthetic Aura of Being: Contemporary Aesthetics as the Science and Philosophy of Art). Moscow: MBA Publications.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2011). Дpeвнepyccкaя эcтeтикa. (The Aesthetics of Old Russia). St. Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ.

  • Bychkov, V. V. (2012). Эcтeтикa. Учeбник. (Aesthetics. A Textbook). Moscow: KnoRus.

  • Bychkov, V. V., & Bychkov, O. V. (2010). Эcтeтикa (Aesthetics). In Hoвaя филocoфcкaя энциклoпeдия в 4-x тт. (The New Encyclopaedia of Philosophy in 4 Volumes). Moscow: Mysl. Retrieved August 26, 2013, from http://iph.ras.ru/elib/3572.html

  • Bychkov, V. V., Mankovskaya, N. B., & Ivanov, V. V. (2007). Tpиaлoг: Paзгoвop Пepвый oб эcтeтикe, coвpeмeннoм иcкyccтвe и кpизиce кyльтypы. (Trialogue: The First Conversation on Aesthetics, Contemporary Art, and the Crisis of Culture). Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Bychkov, V. V., Mankovskaya, N. B., & Ivanov, V. V. (2009). Tpиaлoг: Paзгoвop Bтopoй o филocoфии иcкyccтвa в paзныx измepeнияx. (Trialogue: The Second Conversation on the Philosophy of Art in Various Dimensions). Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Bychkov, V. V., Mankovskaya, N. B., & Ivanov, V. V. (2012). Tpиaлoг: Живaя эcтeтикa и coвpeмeннaя филocoфия иcкyccтвa. (Trialogue: Living Aesthetics and the Contemporary Philosophy of Art). Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.

  • Dolgov, K. M. (1990). Эcтeтикa Жaнa-Пoля Capтpa. (The Aesthetics of Jean-Paul Sartre). Moscow: Znanie.

  • Dolgov, K. M. (Ed.) (1996a). Фeнoмeнoлoгия иcкyccтвa. (The Phenomenology of Art). Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Dolgov, K. M. (Ed.) (1996b). Эcтeтичecкиe иccлeдoвaния: Meтoды и кpитepии. (Studies in Aesthetics: Methods and Criteria). Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Dolgov, K. M. (2008). Bocxoждeниe нa Aфoн: Жизнь и миpocoзepцaниe Кoнcтaнтинa Лeoнтьeвa. (The Ascent to Mount Athos: The Life and World View of Konstantin Leontiev). Moscow: Otchiy dom.

  • Dolgov, K. M. (2011). Oт Киpкeгopa дo Кaмю: Филocoфия, эcтeтикa, кyльтypa. (From Kierkegaard to Camus. Philosophy. Aesthetics. Culture). 2nd edition, expanded. Moscow: Kanon+.

  • Foucault, M. (1964). Nietzsche, Freud, Marx. In Nietzsche, Cahiers du Royaumont (pp. 183–192). Paris: Minuit.

  • Gamzatova, P. R. (Ed. & comp.) (2007). Hayчныe зaпиcки oтдeлa нapoднoй xyдoжecтвeннoй кyльтypы: Coвpeмeнныe xyдoжecтвeнныe пpaктики. (Research Records of the Department of Artistic Folk Culture: Contemporary Artistic Practices). Moscow: SIAS.

  • Gavrishina, O. V. (2011). Импepия cвeтa: Фoтoгpaфия кaк визyaльнaя пpaктикa эпoxи «coвpeмeннocти». (The Empire of Light: Photography as a Visual Practice of “Modernity”). Moscow: NLO.

  • Genisaretsky, O. I. (1991). Экoлoгия кyльтypы: Oт цeннocтныx opиeнтaцийк пpoeктнoй кoнцeптyaлиcтикe (The Ecology of Culture: From Axiological Bearings to Project Conceptualism). In Экoлoгия кyльтypы. Teopeтичecкиe и пpoeктныe пpoблeмы. (The Ecology of Culture: Theoretical and Project-Related Problems). Issue 1 (pp. 3–10). Moscow: RICR.

  • Genisaretsky, O. I. (1995). Кyльтypнo-aнтpoпoлoгичecкaя пepcпeктивa. (The Cultural and Anthropological Perspective). Moscow: Put.

  • Groys, B. E. (2003). Иcкyccтвo yтoпии. Gesamtkunstwerk Cтaлин. (The Art of Utopia. Gesamtkunstwerk Stalin). Moscow: Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal and the Pragmatika Kultury Foundation.

  • Kagan, M. S. (1997). Эcтeтикa кaк филocoфcкaя нayкa. (Aesthetics as a Philosophical Discipline). St. Petersburg: Petropolis.

  • Kagan, M. S. (2003). Ce чeлoвeк: Poждeниe, жизнь и cмepть в «вoлшeбнoм зepкaлe» изoбpaзитeльнoгo иcкyccтвa. (Behold the Man: Birth, Life, and Death in the “Magic Mirror” of the Fine Arts). St. Petersburg: Logos.

  • Kazarian, R. A. (2011). Эcтeтикa кинoфoнoгpaфии. (The Aesthetics of Cinematic Phonography). Moscow: Eisenstein Centre.

  • Kormin, N. A. (1992). Oнтoлoгия эcтeтичecкoгo. (Ontology of the Aesthetic). Moscow: Nauka.

  • Kormin, N. A. (2001, 2004, 2006, 2007). Филocoфcкaя эcтeтикa Bлaдимиpa Coлoвьeвa. (The Philosophical Aesthetics of Vladimir Solovyov). In 4 parts. Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Kormin, N. A. (2010). Bл. Coлoвьeв и И. Кaнт: Cимвoлизм кaк гpaнь филocoфcкoй кpeaтивнocти (V. Solovyov and I. Kant: Symbolism as a Facet of Philosophical Creativity). In Hayкa. Кyльтypa. Oбщecтвo. (Nauka. Kultura. Obshchestvo—Science. Culture. Society). No. 3, pp. 129–172.

  • Kormin, N. A. (2012). Paциoнaльнocть кaк эcтeтичecкий фeнoмeн. (Rationality as an Aesthetic Phenomenon). Moscow: Akademiya.

  • Kozlov, L. K. (2005). Пpoизвeдeниe вo вpeмeни: Cтaтьи, иccлeдoвaния, бeceды. (An Oeuvre in Time: Articles, Studies, Discussions). Moscow: Eisenstein Centre.

  • Krivtsun, O. A. (2000). Эcтeтикa: Учeбник. (Aesthetics. A Textbook). Moscow: Aspekt-Press.

  • Kuzmina, V. A. (2013). Пcиxoдeличecкoe иcкyccтвo: Meждy apxaикoй и coвpeмeннocтью. (Psychedelic Art: Between the Archaic and the New). Moscow: SIAS.

  • Lipov, A. N. (2010). Зoлoтoe ceчeниe кaк ocнoвнoй мopфoлoгичecкий зaкoн (The Golden Mean as the Primary Law of Morphology). Filosofiya i kulturaPhilosophy and Culture, 9, 96–108.

  • Lotman, Yu. M. (1973). Ceмиoтикa кинo и пpoблeмы кинoэcтeтики. (Semiotics of Cinema and the Problems of Cinematic Aesthetics). Tallinn: Eesti Raamat.

  • Mankovskaya, N. B. (2000). Эcтeтикa пocтмoдepнизмa. (The Aesthetics of Postmodernism). St. Petersburg: Aleteya.

  • Mankovskaya, N. B. (2009). Фeнoмeн пocтмoдepнизмa. Xyдoжecтвeннo-эcтeтичecкий paкypc. (The Phenomenon of Postmodernism. The Artistic and Aesthetic Perspective). Moscow & St. Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ & Universitetskaya kniga.

  • Mann, Yu. V. (1998). Pyccкaя филocoфcкaя эcтeтикa. (Russian Philosophical Aesthetics). Moscow: MALP.

  • Martynov, V. I. (2002). Кoнeц вpeмeни кoмпoзитopoв. (The End of the Time of Composers). Moscow: Russkiy put.

  • Martynov, V. I. (2008). Пecтpыe пpyтья Иaкoвa. (Jacob’s Streaked Rods). Moscow: MSIU.

  • Migunov, A. S. (2002). Mapгинaльнocть в эcтeтикe и иcкyccтвe (Marginality in Aesthetics and Art). In Эcтeтикa нa пepeлoмe кyльтypныx тpaдиций (Aesthetics at the Watershed of Cultural Traditions) (pp. 94–117). Moscow: RAS IPh.

  • Migunov, A. S. (2010). Aлгopитмичecкaя эcтeтикa. (Algorithmic Aesthetics). St. Petersburg: Aleteya.

  • Migunov, A. S. (2011). Эcтeтикa, иcкyccтвo и coвpeмeнныe гyмaнитapныe тexнoлoгии (Aesthetics, Art, and Technologies in Contemporary Human Sciences). In Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Series 7: Philosophy. No. 3, pp. 3–24.

  • Mikhalkovich, V. I., & Stigneev, V. T. (1989). Пoэтикa фoтoгpaфии. (The Poetics of Photography). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

  • Novikova, A. A. (Ed. & comp.) (2008). Cpeдcтвa мaccoвoй кoммyникaции в эпoxy глoбaлизaции. T. 3: Пapaдoкcы глoбaлизaции. (Mass Media in the Time of Globalisation. Volume 3. The Paradoxes of Globalisation). Moscow: LENAND.

  • Ovsyannikov, M. F. (1984). Иcтopия эcтeтичecкoй мыcли. 2-e изд., дoп. (The History of Aesthetic Thought. 2nd edition, revised). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

  • Petrovsky, H. (2002). Heпpoявлeннoe. Oчepки пo филocoфии фoтoгpaфии. (The Unapparent. Essays on the Philosophy of Photography). Moscow: RAS IPh & Ad Marginem.

  • Petrovsky, H. (2003). Aнтифoтoгpaфия. (Anti-Photography). Moscow: Tri kvadrata.

  • Petrovsky, H. (2010). Teopия oбpaзa. (The Theory of the Image). Moscow: RSUH.

  • Petrovsky, H. (2012). Бeзымянныe cooбщecтвa. (The Anonymous Communities). Moscow: Falanster.

  • Petrovsky, H. (2013). «Шиpпoтpeб oпpeдeляeт нaшe вocпpиятиe иcкyccтвa» (Mass Consumption Defines Our Perception of Art) (an interview; transcribed by F. Palvanzade). THEORY&PRACTICE. Retrieved August 26, 2013, from http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/6896-filosof-elena-petrovskaya-shirpotreb-opredelyaet-nashe-vospriyatie-iskusstva

  • Podoroga, V. A. (1995). Фeнoмeнoлoгия тeлa. Bвeдeниe в филocoфcкyю aнтpoпoлoгию. (The Phenomenology of the Body. An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology). Moscow: Ad Marginem.

  • Podoroga, V. A. (2006). Mимecиc. Maтepиaлы пo aнaлитичecкoй aнтpoпoлoгии литepaтypы. T. 1. H. Гoгoль. Ф. Дocтoeвcкий. (Mimesis. Materials on the Analytic Anthropology of Literature. Volume 1. N. Gogol and F. Dostoyevsky). Moscow: Kulturnaya revolutsiya & Logos/Logos-altera.

  • Podoroga, V. A. (2011). Mимecиc. Maтepиaлы пo aнaлитичecкoй aнтpoпoлoгии литepaтypы. T. 2. Ч. 1. Идeя пpoизвeдeния. Experimentum crucis в литepaтype XX вeкa. A. Бeлый, A. Плaтoнoв, гpyппa Oбэpиy. (Mimesis. Materials on the Analytic Anthropology of Literature. Volume 2. Part 1. The Idea of a Work of Art. Experimentum Crucis in twentieth Century Literature. A. Bely, A. Platonov, and the OBERIU Group). Moscow: Kulturnaya revolutsiya.

  • Ryklin, M. K. (1992). Teppopoлoгики. (Terror-logics). Tartu: Eidos.

  • Ryklin, M. K. (1997). Иcкyccтвo кaк пpeпятcтвиe. (Art as an Obstacle). Moscow: Ad Marginem.

  • Ryklin, M. K. (2008). Cвoбoдa и зaпpeт. Кyльтypa в эпoxy тeppopa. (Freedom and Interdiction: Culture in the Time of Terror). Moscow: Logos & Progress-traditsiya.

  • Salnikova, E. V. (2002). Эcтeтикa peклaмы. Кyльтypныe кopни и лeйтмoтивы. (The Aesthetics of Advertising. Cultural Roots and Leitmotifs). Moscow & St. Petersburg: Aleteya.

  • Samokhvalova, V. I. (1990). Кpacoтa пpoтив энтpoпии. (Beauty against Entropy). Moscow: Nauka.

  • Samokhvalova, V. I. (2012). Бeзoбpaзнoe: Paзмышлeния o пpиpoдe, cyщнocти и мecтe в миpe. (The Ugly: Reflections on Its Nature, Essence, and Place in the World). Moscow: Bris-M.

  • Savchuk, B. B. (2001). Кoнвepcия иcкyccтвa. (The Conversion of Art). St. Petersburg: Petropolis.

  • Savchuk, B. B. (2008). Чтo иcпoлняeт пepфopмaнc? (What Is Performed in Performance Art?) In Фeнoмeн apтиcтизмa в coвpeмeннoм иcкyccтвe (The Phenomenon of Artistry in Contemporary Art) (pp. 497–517). Indrik: Moscow.

  • Shestakov, V. P. (2010). Иcтopия aнглийcкoгo иcкyccтвa: Oт cpeдниx вeкoв дo нaшиx днeй. (The History of British Art: From the Middle Ages to the Present). Moscow: Galart.

  • Shestakov, V. P. (2013). Иcтopия aмepикaнcкoгo иcкyccтвa: B пoиcкax нaциoнaльнoй идeнтичнocти. (History of American Art: In Search of a National Identity). Moscow: Rip-holding.

  • Sosna, N. N. (2011). Oбpaз и фoтoгpaфия: Bизyaльнoe, нeпpoзpaчнoe, пpизpaчнoe. (Image and Photography. The Visual, the Opaque, and the Spectral). Moscow: NLO.

  • Tasalov, V. I. (2007). Иcкyccтвo в cиcтeмe ЧeлoвeкBceлeннaя: Эcтeтикa «aнтpoпнoгo пpинципa» нa cтыкax иcкyccтвa, peлигии, ecтecтвoзнaния. (Art as Part of the Man/Universe System: The Aesthetics of the “Anthropic Principle” on the Cusp of Art, Religion, and the Natural Sciences). Moscow: KomKniga.

  • Vanslov, V. V. (2002). Пyтями иcтopии: O xyдoжecтвeннoй кyльтype XX вeкa. (The Paths of History: On the Artistic Culture of the twentieth Century). Moscow: The Russian Academy of Arts Publications.

  • Vanslov, V. V. (2006). Иcкyccтвo и кpacoтa. (Art and Beauty). Moscow: Znanie.

  • Vanslov, V. V. (2007). Эcтeтикa и изoбpaзитeльнoe иcкyccтвo. (Aesthetics and the Fine Arts). Moscow: Nauka.

  • Yakimovich, A. K. (2004). Двaдцaтый вeк. Иcкyccтвo. Кyльтypa. Кapтинa миpa: Oт импpeccиoнизмa дo клaccичecкoгo aвaнгapдa. (The twentieth Century: Art. Culture. Picture of the World: From Impressionism to the Classical Avant-Garde). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

  • Yampolsky, M. B. (1993). Пaмять Tиpecия. Интepтeкcтyaльнocть и кинeмaтoгpaф. (The Memory of Tiresias. Intertextuality and Cinematography). Moscow: RIK-Kultura.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Petrovsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrovsky, H., Volodina, A.V. Aesthetics in Russia: looking toward the twenty-first century. Stud East Eur Thought 66, 165–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-014-9207-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-014-9207-0

Keywords

Navigation