Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Justice in Our World and in that of Others: Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Victims

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Framed by the Belief in a Just World theory (BJW; Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation), this article presents two studies that analyze people’s reactions to the suffering of victims belonging to an ingroup and an outgroup. In Study 1, participants viewed a videotaped film containing the victimization story. The victim was presented as a non-categorized, ingroup or outgroup (Gypsy) victim. Threat to BJW was measured using the modified Stroop task developed by Hafer (J Pers Soc Psychol 79:165–173, 2000). In the second study, a non-victimization story was introduced and a 2 (victim, non-victim) × 2 (ingroup, outgroup) between-subjects design was used. Both studies show that the ingroup victim is more threatening to the BJW than the outgroup victim. The expected secondary victimization of the ingroup victim was only obtained in the second study when a non-obtrusive derogation measure was used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All stimuli were presented in 18 point Arial font. Participants completed the two tasks on a personal computer (Pentium IV, 2.8 Ghz) equipped with an E-Prime response box and with a 17′′ color monitor. The monitor set to a resolution of 1024 × 768 pixels and with a screen-refresh rate of 60 Hz and the cycle duration of 15 ms. Participants were seated at a distance of approximately 50 cm from the computer and they were instructed to maximize the speed and the accuracy of their responses.

References

  • Anderson, V. N. (1992). For whom is this world just? Sexual orientation and AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. R., Kang, S. H., & Romano, P. (1990). Cancer and stress: The effects of social support as a resource. In C. Cooper & M. Watson (Eds.), Cancer and stress: Psychological, biological and coping studies. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braman, A. C., & Lambert, A. J. (2001). Punishing individuals for their infirmities: Effects of personal responsibility, just-world beliefs, and in-group/out-group status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1096–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., & Vala, J. (2003). When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effect of the observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Social Justice Research, 16, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim’s innocence on secondary victimization, justice and victim’s deservingness. Social Justice Research, 14, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim’s innocence, social categorization and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Experimental Psychology Laboratory of the FPCE. (2000). TEC - experimental tests in cognition, version 1.2. Lisbon: Núcleo de Cognição Visual e de Neuropsicologia do Laboratório de Psicologia Experimental da Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.

  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation: From category based to individuating processes as a function of information, motivation, and attention. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., & Seidel, O. (2005). Contextual influences on implicit evaluation: A test of additive versus contrastive effects of evaluative context stimuli in affective priming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1226–1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L, & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (2003). An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 311–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why, how people care about justice. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 247–270). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Goldberg, J. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive systems. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 627–640). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1998). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive, self-interest? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S., & Pérez, J. A. (1999). A extraordinária resistência das minorias à pressão das maiorias: o caso dos ciganos. In Em J. Vala (Org.), Novos racismos: Perspectivas comparativas (pp. 103–119). Oeiras: Celta.

  • Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, D. W., & Lerner, M. J. (1968). Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 147–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, C. W., Dovidio, J. F., Gurtman, M. B., & Tyler, R. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with outliers. Psychological Review, 114, 510–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1990). Moral exclusion, personal goal theory, and extreme destructiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. II). Cambridge University Press.

  • Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 595–629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

  • Vala, J., Lima, M., & Pereira, C. (2006). The role of egalitarian and meritocratic norms on the depersonalization of black people. Research report from CIIS, ISCTE, Lisbon.

  • Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the PRAXIS/POCTI PSI/12091/1998 and SFRH/BD/10917/2003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Vala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguiar, P., Vala, J., Correia, I. et al. Justice in Our World and in that of Others: Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Victims. Soc Just Res 21, 50–68 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0059-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0059-3

Keywords

Navigation