Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to “Response to ‘Limitations in the Hilbert Transform Approach to Locating Solar Cycle Terminators’ by R.J. Booth”

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 22 October 2021

Abstract

This is a reply to Leamon et al., Solar Phys., 2021 (in press, hereinafter L21), which is a response to Booth, Solar Phys. 296, 108, 2021. We agree that, given a fixed constant subtracted from the sunspot counts prior to the Hilbert transform, the L21 algorithm to determine historical sunspot cycle terminators is robust, but add that it has no dependence at all on start and end dates. However, the prediction of a future terminator relies on properties of the transform, which do depend on both start and end dates. For the Cycle 24 terminator, the 95% confidence interval (CI) implied by L21’s statistics includes all dates until September 2022. For each new month that the terminator is proven not to occur, the CI’s end date will be extended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booth, R.J.: 2021, Limitations in the Hilbert transform approach to locating solar cycle terminators. Solar Phys. 296, 108. DOI.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leamon, R.J., McIntosh, S.W., Chapman, S.C., Watkins, N.W.: 2020, Timing terminators: forecasting sunspot Cycle 25 onset. Solar Phys. 295, 36. DOI.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leamon, R.J., McIntosh, S.W., Chapman, S.C., Watkins, N.W.: 2021, Response to “Limitations in the Hilbert transform approach to locating solar cycle terminators” by R.J Booth. Solar Phys. DOI (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Booth.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The author declares to have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The author is a private researcher.

Both this comment and the https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01897-z comment refer to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01833-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Booth, R.J. Reply to “Response to ‘Limitations in the Hilbert Transform Approach to Locating Solar Cycle Terminators’ by R.J. Booth”. Sol Phys 296, 167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01911-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01911-4

Navigation