Abstract
The accuracy of data-driven magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) models depends on accurate boundary conditions specified at the inner heliosphere. However, not all of the MHD parameters [\(\boldsymbol{B}, \boldsymbol{v}, \rho , T\)] are measurable close to the Sun at the present time, except the vector magnetic field [\(\boldsymbol{B} \)] at the photosphere. The solar wind speed [\(\boldsymbol{v}\)], which is probably most relevant to space-weather forecasting, is often modeled by the standard Wang–Sheeley (WS) formula, which is based on an inverse relationship between the solar wind speed [\(\boldsymbol{v}\)] at 1 AU and the expansion factor [\(f_{\text{s}}\)] estimated at 2.5 solar radii [\(\text{R}_{ \odot }\)], with the following generic form: \({v} = {v}_{1} + {v}_{2} f_{\text{s}}^{- \alpha }\) (where \(\boldsymbol{v}\) is the solar wind speed at 18 \(\text{R}_{\odot }\), \(f_{\text{s}}\) is the magnetic-field expansion factor, and \({v}_{1}\), \({v}_{2}\), and \(\alpha \) are three free parameters to be determined). While the WS formula uses “source projection” to determine the solar wind source, it does not treat the solar wind as plasma because it uses the solar wind speed observed at 1 AU to derive the empirical relationship. Thus, the resulting formula ignores the transport and acceleration of the solar wind as it propagates out into the heliosphere. The purpose of this study is to rectify this omission by using a numerical MHD simulation to find the optimal set of free parameters that relate the magnetic properties at the source surface to the plasma parameters at 1 AU. In addition to the expansion factor, conservation of mass [\(\rho \boldsymbol{v}\)], magnetic flux [\(r ^{2} B\)], and total pressure along the stream line are assumed to obtain the solar wind mass density, magnetic field, and temperature at 18 \(\text{R}_{\odot }\). These parameters are used as the inner boundary conditions of our global three-dimensional MHD (G3DMHD) code to simulate solar wind plasma and field parameters out to \({\approx}\, 1~\mbox{AU}\). The simulation results are compared with the in-situ data from Wind to assess the accuracy. Such a procedure is repeated (880 times) to cover the three parameter regimes (\(100 < {v}_{1} < 350~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\); \(250 < {v}_{2} < 700~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\); and \(0.2 < \alpha < 0.9\)) to find the optimal set. The simulation is performed for the period of CR2082 [30 March 2019 to 27 April 2009]. It is found that \(\boldsymbol{v} = 189 + 679 f_{\text{s}}^{-0.7}\) is the best formula to relate the solar wind speed at 18 \(\text{R}_{\odot }\) to the expansion factor. Strictly speaking, this formula is most applicable for solar equatorial regions and near the times of solar minimum when there are few coronal mass ejection events.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arge, C.N., Pizzo, V.J.: 1999, Historical verification of the Wang–Sheeley model: further improvements in basic technique. In: Habbal, S.R., Halas, C.D., (eds.) Proc. Ninth Internat. Solar Wind Conf.CP-471, Am. Inst. Phys., Melville, 569. DOI .
Arge, C.N., Pizzo, V.J.: 2000, Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates. J. Geophys. Res.105, 10465. DOI .
Arge, C.N., Odstrcil, D., Pizzo, V.J., Mayer, L.R.: 2003, Improved method for specifying solar wind speed near the Sun. In: Velli, M., Bruno, R., Malara, F. (eds.) Proc. Tenth Internat. Solar Wind Conf.CP-679, Am. Inst. Phys., Melville, 190. DOI .
Arge, C.N., Luhmann, J.G., Schrijver, C.J., Li, Y.: 2004, Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys.66, 1295. DOI .
Detman, T.R., Dryer, M., Yeh, T., Han, S.M., Wu, S.T.: 1991, A time-dependent, three-dimensional MHD numerical study of interplanetary magnetic draping around plasmoids in the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res.96, 9531. DOI .
Dryer, M., Wu, C.-C., Smith, Z.K.: 1997, Three-dimensional MHD simulation of the April 14, 1994, interplanetary coronal mass ejection and its propagation to Earth and Ulysses. J. Geophys. Res.102, 14065. DOI .
Feng, X., Ma, X., Xiang, C.: 2015, Data-driven modeling of the solar wind from 1 Rs to 1 AU. J. Geophys. Res.120, 10, 159. DOI .
Fry, C.D., Sun, W., Deehr, C.S., Dryer, M., Smith, Z., Akasofu, S.-I., Tokumaru, M., Kojima, M.: 2001, Improvements to the HAF solar wind model for space weather predictions. J. Geophys. Res.106(A10), 20985. DOI .
Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Mäkelä, P., Xie, H., Akiyama, S., Monstein, C.: 2018, Extreme kinematics of the 2017 September 10 solar eruption and the spectral characteristics of the associated energetic particles. Astrophys. J. Lett.863, L39. DOI .
Groth, C.P., De Zeeuw, D.L., Gombosi, T.I., Powell, K.G.: 2000, Global three-dimensional MHD simulation of a space weather event: CME formation, interplanetary propagation, and interaction with the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res.105, 25053. DOI .
Han, S.M.: 1977, A numerical study of two dimensional time dependent magnetohydrodynamic flows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Han, S.M., Wu, S.T., Dryer, M.: 1988, A three-dimensional, time-dependent numerical modeling of super-sonic, super-Alfvénic MHD flow. Comput. Fluids16, 81.
Hayashi, K., Tokumaru, M., Fujiki, K., Kojima, M.: 2011, Three-dimensional solar wind structures obtained with MHD simulation model using observation-based time-varying inner boundary map. In: Pogorelov, N.V. (ed.) 5th Internat. Conf. Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows (ASTRONUM 2010), Astron. Soc. Pacific, San Francisco, 211. ADS .
Hess, P., Colaninno, R.C.: 2017, Comparing automatic CME detections in multiple LASCO and SECCHI catalogs. Astrophys. J.836, 134. DOI .
Lax, P.D., Wendroff, B.: 1960, Systems of conservation laws. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.13, 217.
Lepping, R.P., Wu, C.-C., Berdichevsky, D.B., Szabo, A.: 2015, Wind magnetic clouds for 2010 – 2012: model parameter fittings, associated shock waves, and comparisons to earlier periods. Solar Phys.290, 2265. DOI .
Linker, J.A., Mikić, Z., Riley, P., Lionello, R., Odstrcil, D.: 2003, Models of coronal mass ejections: a review with a look to the future. In: Velli, M., Bruno, R., Malara, F. (eds.) Proc. Tenth Internat. Solar WindCP-679, Am. Inst. Phys., Melville, 703. DOI .
Liou, K., Wu, C.-C.: 2016, A possible cause of the diminished solar wind during the solar Cycle 23 – 24 minimum. Solar Phys.291, 3777. DOI .
Liou, K., Wu, C.-C., Dryer, M., Wu, S.T., Nathan, R., Plunkett, S., Simpson, L., Fry, C.D., Schenk, K.: 2014, Global simulation of extremely fast coronal mass ejection on 23 July 2012. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys.121, 32. DOI
Lugaz, N., Roussev, I.: 2011, Numerical modeling of interplanetary coronal mass ejections and comparison with heliospheric images. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys.73, 1187. DOI .
Manchester, W.B., Gombosi, T.I., Roussev, I., Ridley, A., Zeeuw, D.D., Sokolov, I.V., Powell, K.G., Tóth, G.: 2004, Modeling a space weather event from the Sun to the Earth: CME generation and interplanetary propagation. J. Geophys. Res.109, A02107. DOI .
McComas, D.J., Ebert, R.W., Elliott, H.A., Goldstein, B.E., Gosling, J.T., Schwardron, N.A., Skoug, R.M.: 2008, Weaker solar wind from the polar coronal holes and the whole Sun. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L18103. DOI .
McGregor, S.L., Hughes, W.J., Arge, C.N., Owens, M.J., Odstrcil, D.: 2011, The distribution of solar wind speeds during solar minimum calibration for numerical solar wind modeling constrains on the source of the slow solar wind. J. Geophys. Res.116, A03101. DOI .
Merkin, V.G., Lyon, J.G., Lario, D., Arge, C.N., Henney, C.J.: 2016, Time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the inner heliosphere. J. Geophys. Res.121, 2866. DOI .
Mikić, Z., Linker, J.A.: 1994, Disruption of coronal magnetic field arcades. Astrophys. J.430, 898. DOI .
Odstrčil, D.: 2003, Modeling 3-D solar wind structure. Adv. Space Res.32, 497. DOI .
Odstrčil, D., Pizza, V.J.: 1999a, Three-dimensional propagation of CMEs in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt. J. Geophys. Res.104, 483. DOI .
Odstrčil, D., Pizza, V.J.: 1999b, Three-dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections in a structured solar wind flow 2. CME launched adjacent to the streamer belt. J. Geophys. Res.104, 28225. DOI .
Owens, M., Cargill, P.: 2004, Predictions of the arrival time of coronal mass ejections at 1 AU: an analysis of the causes of errors. Ann. Geophys.22, 661. DOI .
Owens, M.J., Arge, C.N., Spence, H.E., Pembroke, A.: 2005, An event-based approach to validating solar wind speed predictions: High speed enhancements in the Wang–Sheeley–Arge model. J. Geophys. Res.110, A12105. DOI .
Pogorelov, N.V., Borovikov, S.N., Kryukov, I.A., Wu, S.T., Yalim, M.S., Colella, P.C., Van Straalen, B.: 2017, Modeling coronal mass ejections with the multi-scale fluid-kinetic simulation suite. In: Pogorelov, N.V., Audit, E., Zank, G.P. (eds.) Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Numerical Modelling of Space Plasma Flows (ASTRONUM 2016)CS-837, J. Phys., IOP, Bristol, 012014. DOI .
Riley, P., Linker, L.A., Arge, C.N.: 2015, On the role played by magnetic expansion factor in the prediction of solar wind speed. Space Weather13, 154. DOI .
Shen, F., Feng, X.S., Wu, S.T., Xiang, C.Q., Song, W.B.: 2011, Three-dimensional MHD simulation of the evolution of the April 2000 CME event and its induced shocks using a magnetized plasma blob model. J. Geophys. Res.116, A04102. DOI .
Shiota, D., Kataoka, R., Miyoshi, Y., Hara, T., Tao, C., Masunaga, K., Futaana, Y., Terada, N.: 2014, Inner heliosphere MHD modeling system applicable to space weather forecasting for the other planets. Space Weather12, 187. DOI .
Smith, E.J., Balogh, A.: 2008, Decrease in heliospheric magnetic flux in this solar minimum: recent Ulysses magnetic field observations. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L22105. DOI .
Tóth, G., Sokolov, J.V., Gombosi, T.I., Chesney, D.R., Clauer, C.R., de Zeeuw, D.L., Hansen, K.C., Kane, K.J., Manchester, W.B., Oehmke, R.C., Powell, K.G., Ridley, A.J., Roussev, I., Stout, Q.F., Volberg, O., Wolf, R.A., Sazykin, S., Chan, A., Yu, B., Kóta, J.: 2005, Space weather modeling framework: a new tool for the space science community. J. Geophys. Res.110, A12226. DOI .
Vandas, M., Odstrčil, D., Watari, S.: 2002, Three-dimensional MHD simulation of a loop-like magnetic cloud in the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res.107, 1236. DOI .
Vourlidas, A., Balmaceda, L.A., Guillermo, S., Dal Lago, A.: 2017, Multi-viewpoint control mass ejection catalog based on STEREO COR2 observations. Astrophys. J.838, 141. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Colaninno, R.: 2014, Is solar cycle 24 producing more coronal mass ejections than Cycle 23? Astrophys. J. Lett.784, L27. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Robbrecht, E., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 2009, On the weakening of the polar magnetic fields during solar cycle 23. Astrophys. J.707, 1372. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr, Nash, A.G.: 1990, Latitudinal distribution of solar wind speed from magnetic observations of the Sun. Nature347, 439. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1990, Solar wind speed and coronal flux-tube expansion. Astrophys. J.355, 726. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1992, On potential field models of the solar corona. Astrophys. J.392, 310. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Dryer, M.: 1997, Three-dimensional MHD simulation of interplanetary magnetic field changes at 1 AU caused by a simulated solar disturbance and a tilted heliospheric current/plasma sheet. Solar Phys.173, 391. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Dryer, M., Wu, S.T.: 1996, Three-dimensional MHD simulation of interplanetary magnetic field changes at 1 AU as a consequence of simulated solar flares. Ann. Geophys.14(4), 383. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Lepping, R.P.: 2015, Comparisons of characteristics of magnetic clouds and cloud-like structures during 1995 – 2012. Solar Phys.290, 1243. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Lepping, R.P., Gopalswamy, N.: 2006, Relationships among magnetic clouds, CMES, and geomagnetic storms. Solar Phys.239, 449. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Fry, C.D., Dryer, M., Smith, Z., Detman, T.: 2005, Predicting the arrival time of shock passages at Earth. Solar Phys.227, 371. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Fry, C.D., Wu, S.T., Dryer, M., Liou, K.: 2007a, Three-dimensional global simulation of ICME propagation from the Sun to the heliosphere: 12 May 1997. J. Geophys. Res.112, A09104. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Fry, C.D., Wu, S.T., Dryer, M., Thompson, B., Liou, K., Feng, X.S.: 2007b, Three-dimensional global simulation of multiple ICMEs’ interaction and propagation from the Sun to the heliosphere following the 25 – 28 October 2003 solar events, coronal mass ejections. Adv. Space Rev.40, 1827. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Dryer, M., Wu, S.T., Wood, B., Fry, C.D., Liou, K., Plunkett, S.: 2011, Global three-dimensional simulation of the interplanetary evolution of the observed geoeffective CME during the epoch August 1 – 4, 2010. J. Geophys. Res.116, A12103. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Wu, S.T., Dryer, M., Fry, C.D., Plunkett, S.: 2012, Heliospheric three-dimensional global simulation of multiple interacting coronal mass ejections during the Halloween 2003 epoch. In: Heerikhuisen, J., Li, G., Pogorelov, N., Zank, G. (eds.) Physics of the Heliosphere: A 10 Year Retrospective: Proc. 10th Annu. Internat. Astrophys. Conf.CP-1436, Am. Inst. Phys., Melville, 285. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Lepping, R.P., Hutting, L., Plunkett, S., Howard, R.A., Socker, D.: 2016a, The first super geomagnetic storm of Solar Cycle 24: “The St. Patrick’s day event (17 March 2015)”. Earth Planets Space68, 151. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Vourlidas, A., Plunkett, S., Dryer, M., Wu, S.T., Mewaldt, R.A.: 2016b, Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the March 15, 2013 coronal mass ejection event – interpretation of the 30 – 80 MeV proton flux. J. Geophys. Res.121, 56. DOI .
Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Lepping, R.P., Hutting, L.: 2019, The 04-10 September 2017 Sun–Earth connection events: solar flares, coronal mass ejections/magnetic clouds, and geomagnetic storms. Solar Phys.294, 110. DOI .
Wu, S.T., Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Plunkett, S., Dryer, M., Fry, C.D.: 2014, Analyses of the evolution and interaction of multiple coronal mass ejections and their shocks in July 2012. In: Hu, Q., Zank, G.P. (eds.) Outstanding Problems in Heliophysics: from Coronal Heating to the Edge of the HeliosphereCS-484, Astron. Soc. Pacific, San Francisco, 241.
Yalim, M.S., Pogorelov, N., Liu, Y.: 2017, A data-driven MHD model of the global solar corona within multi-scale fluid-kinetic simulation suite (MS-FLUKSS). In: Pogorelov, N.V., Audit, E., Zank, G.P. (eds.) Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Numerical Modelling of Space Plasma Flows (ASTRONUM 2016)CS-837, J. Phys., IOP, Bristol, 012015. DOI .
Yu, H.S., Jackson, B.V., Hick, P.P., Buffington, A., Odstrcil, D., Wu, C.-C., Davies, J.A., Bisi, M.M., Tokumaru, M.: 2015, 3D reconstruction of interplanetary scintillation (IPS) remote-sensing data: global solar wind boundaries for driving 3D-MHD models. Solar Phys.290, 2519. DOI .
Acknowledgements
All data used in this study are obtained from the public domain. We thank the Wind PI teams and the National Space Science Data Center at NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center for providing the solar wind plasma and magnetic-field data. The work of C.C. Wu was supported partially by the Chief of Naval Research and the NASA 80HQTR18T0023, HSWO2R17-0005, and 80HRTR19T0062 grants. The work of K. Liou was supported by the NSF grant 1743118 to the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. The authors thank Christopher Kung from Engility/DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Office PETTT program for his technical assistance in parallelizing the G3DMHD code.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, CC., Liou, K. & Warren, H. The Solar Wind Speed Expansion Factor [\({v}\)–\(f _{\text{s}}\)] Relationship at the Inner Boundary (18 \(\text{R}_{\odot }\)) of the Heliosphere. Sol Phys 295, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1576-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1576-6