Abstract
The minimum dissipative rate (MDR) method for deriving a coronal non-force-free magnetic field solution is partially evaluated. These magnetic field solutions employ a combination of three linear (constant-α) force-free-field solutions with one being a potential field (i.e., α=0). The particular case of the solutions where the other two α’s are of equal magnitude but of opposite sign is examined. This is motivated by studying the SOLIS (Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigation of the Sun (SOLIS), a National Solar Observatory facility) vector magnetograms of AR 10987, which show a global α value consistent with an α=0 value as evaluated by (∇×B) z /B z over the region. Typical of the current state of the observing technology, there is no definitive twist for input into the general MDR method. This suggests that the special α case, of two α’s with equal magnitudes and opposite signs, is appropriate given the data. Only for an extensively twisted active region does a dominant, nonzero α normally emerge from a distribution of local values. For a special set of conditions, is it found that (i) the resulting magnetic field is a vertically inflated magnetic field resulting from the electric currents being parallel to the photosphere, similar to the results of Gary and Alexander (Solar Phys. 186:123, 1999), and (ii) for α≈(α max /2), the Lorentz force per unit volume normalized by the square of the magnetic field is on the order of 1.4×10−10 cm−1. The Lorentz force (F L) is a factor of ten higher than that of the magnetic force d(B 2/8π)/dz, a component of F L. The calculated photospheric electric current densities are an order of magnitude smaller than the maximum observed in all active regions. Hence both the Lorentz force density and the generated electric current density seem to be physically consistent with possible solar dynamics. The results imply that the field could be inflated with an overpressure along the neutral line. However, the implementation of this or any other extrapolation method using the electric current density as a lower boundary condition must be done cautiously, with the current magnetography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharyya, R., Janaki, M.S.: 2004, Phys. Plasmas 11, 5615.
Bhattacharyya, R., Janaki, M.S., Dasgupta, B., Zank, G.P.: 2007, Solar Phys. 240, 63.
Chandrasekhar, S., Woltjer, L.: 1958, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 44, 285.
Dasgupta, B., Dasgupta, P., Janaki, M.S., Watanabe, T., Sato, T.: 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3144.
Dasgupta, B., Shaikh, D., Hu, Q., Zank, G.P.: 2009, J. Plasma Phys., in press. Published online 30 April 2009.
DeRosa, M.L., Schrijver, C.J., Barnes, G., Leka, K.D., Lites, B.W., Aschwanden, M.J., et al.: 2008, Astrophys. J., submitted.
Hu, Q., Dasgupta, B.: 2008, Solar Phys. 247, 87.
Hu, Q., Dasgupta, B., Choudhary, D.P., Buchner, J.: 2008, Astrophys. J. 679, 848.
Gary, G.A.: 1989, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 69, 323.
Gary, G.A., Démoulin, P.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 445, 982.
Gary, G.A., Alexander, D.: 1999, Solar Phys. 186, 123.
Golub, L., Pasachoff, J.M.: 1997, The Solar Corona, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 223.
Pevtsov, A.A.: 2008, Astron. Astrophys. 29, 49.
Taylor, J.B.: 1974, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1139.
Woltjer, L.: 1958, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 44, 489.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gary, G.A. Evaluation of a Selected Case of the Minimum Dissipative Rate Method for Non-Force-Free Solar Magnetic Field Extrapolations. Sol Phys 257, 271–286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9376-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9376-z