Abstract
This study based on longitudinal Zeeman effect magnetograms and spectral line scans investigates the dependence of solar surface magnetic fields on the spectral line used and the way the line is sampled to estimate the magnetic flux emerging above the solar atmosphere and penetrating to the corona from magnetograms of the Mt. Wilson 150-foot tower synoptic program (MWO). We have compared the synoptic program λ5250 Å line of Fe i to the line of Fe i at λ5233 Å since this latter line has a broad shape with a profile that is nearly linear over a large portion of its wings. The present study uses five pairs of sampling points on the λ5233 Å line. Line profile observations show that the determination of the field strength from the Stokes V parameter or from line bisectors in the circularly polarized line profiles lead to similar dependencies on the spectral sampling of the lines, with the bisector method being the less sensitive. We recommend adoption of the field determined with the line bisector method as the best estimate of the emergent photospheric flux and further recommend the use of a sampling point as close to the line core as is practical. The combination of the line profile measurements and the cross-correlation of fields measured simultaneously with λ5250 Å and λ5233 Å yields a formula for the scale factor δ −1 that multiplies the MWO synoptic magnetic fields. By using ρ as the center-to-limb angle (CLA), a fit to this scale factor is δ −1=4.15−2.82sin 2(ρ). Previously δ −1=4.5−2.5sin 2(ρ) had been used. The new calibration shows that magnetic fields measured by the MDI system on the SOHO spacecraft are equal to 0.619±0.018 times the true value at a center-to-limb position 30°. Berger and Lites (2003, Solar Phys. 213, 213) found this factor to be 0.64±0.013 based on a comparison using the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Antiochos, S.K., DeVore, C.R., Karpen, J.T., Mikić, Z.: 2007, Structure and dynamics of the Sun’s open magnetic field. Astrophys. J. 671, 936 – 946. CiteID 1319, doi:10.1086/522489.
Arge, C.N., Hildner, E., Pizzo, V.J., Harvey, J.W.: 2002, Two solar cycles of nonincreasing magnetic flux. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), (16-1) – (16-8). CiteID 1319, doi:10.1029/2001JA000503.
Berger, T.E., Lites, B.W.: 2003, Weak-field magnetogram calibration using advanced Stokes polarimeter flux density maps – II. SOHO/MDI full-disk mode calibration. Solar Phys. 213, 213 – 229.
Caccin, B., Gomez, M.T., Marmolino, C., Severino, G.: 1977, Response functions and contribution functions of photospheric lines. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 227 – 231.
Demidov, M.L., Golubeva, E.M., Balthasar, H., Staude, J., Grigoryev, V.M.: 2008, Comparison of solar magnetic fields measured at different observatories: peculiar strength ratio distributions across the disk. Solar Phys., 125. doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9225-5.
Feigelson, E.D., Babu, G.J.: 1992, Linear regression in astronomy. II. Astrophys. J. 397, 55 – 67. doi:10.1086/171766.
Frazier, E.N., Stenflo, J.O.: 1972, On the small-scale structure of solar magnetic fields. Solar Phys. 27, 330 – 346. doi:10.1007/BF00153105.
Frazier, E.N., Stenflo, J.O.: 1978, Magnetic, velocity and brightness structure of solar faculae. Astron. Astrophys. 70, 789 – 799.
Frutiger, C., Solanki, S.K.: 2001, Empirical models of solar magnetic flux-tubes and their non-magnetic surroundings. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 646 – 659. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010120.
Gibson, S.E., Biesecker, D., Guhathakurta, M., Hoeksema, J.T., Lazarus, A.J., Linker, J., Mikic, Z., Pisanko, Y., Riley, P., Steinberg, J., Strachan, L., Szabo, A., Thompson, B.J., Zhao, X.P.: 1999, The three-dimensional coronal magnetic field during whole Sun month. Astrophys. J. 520, 871 – 879. doi:10.1086/307496.
Howard, R., Stenflo, J.O.: 1972, On the filamentary nature of solar magnetic fields. Solar Phys. 22, 402 – 417. doi:10.1007/BF00148705.
Howard, R., Boyden, J.E., Bruning, D.H., Clark, M.K., Crist, H.W., Labonte, B.J.: 1983, The Mount Wilson magnetograph (report from a Solar Institute). Solar Phys. 87, 195.
Isobe, T., Feigelson, E.D., Akritas, M.G., Babu, G.J.: 1990, Linear regression in astronomy. Astrophys. J. 364, 104 – 113. doi:10.1086/169390.
Khomenko, E.V., Shelyag, S., Solanki, S.K., Vögler, A.: 2005, Stokes diagnostics of simulations of magnetoconvection of mixed-polarity quiet-Sun regions. Astron. Astrophys. 442, 1059 – 1078. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052958.
Landi degl’Innocenti, E., Landi degl’Innocenti, M.: 1973, A perturbative solution of the transfer equations for the Stokes parameters in a magnetic field. Solar Phys. 31, 299.
Lites, B.W.: 2000, Remote sensing of solar magnetic fields. Rev. Geophys. 38, 1 – 36. doi:10.1029/1999RG900011.
Ossendrijver, M.: 2003, The solar dynamo. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 11, 287 – 367.
Sigwarth, M., Balasubramaniam, K.S., Knölker, M., Schmidt, W.: 1999, Dynamics of solar magnetic elements. Astron. Astrophys. 349, 941 – 955.
Skumanich, A., Lites, B.W.: 1987, Stokes profile analysis and vector magnetic fields. I – Inversion of photospheric lines. Astrophys. J. 322, 473 – 482. doi:10.1086/165743.
Socas-Navarro, H., Borrero, J.M., Asensio Ramos, A., Collados, M., Domínguez Cerdeña, I., Khomenko, E.V., Martínez González, M.J., Martínez Pillet, V., Ruiz Cobo, B., Sánchez Almeida, J.: 2008, Multiline spectropolarimetry of the quiet Sun at 5250 and 6302 Å. Astrophys. J. 674, 596 – 606. doi:10.1086/521418.
Solanki, S.K.: 1993, Smallscale solar magnetic fields – an overview. Space Sci. Rev. 63, 1 – 2. doi:10.1007/BF00749277.
Solanki, S.K., Inhester, B., Schüssler, M.: 2006, The solar magnetic field. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 563 – 668. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/3/R02.
Steiner, O.: 1994, Theoretical models of magnetic flux tubes: Structure and dynamics. In: Rabin, D.M., Jefferies, J.T., Lindsey, C. (eds.) Infrared Solar Physics, IAU Symposium 154, 407.
Stenflo, J.O.: 1973, Magnetic-field structure of the photospheric network. Solar Phys. 32, 41 – 63. doi:10.1007/BF00152728.
Stenflo, J.O., Solanki, S., Harvey, J.W., Brault, J.W.: 1984, Diagnostics of solar magnetic fluxtubes using a Fourier transform spectrometer. Astron. Astrophys. 131, 333 – 346.
Tran, T., Bertello, L., Ulrich, R.K., Evans, S.: 2005, Magnetic fields from SOHO MDI converted to the Mount Wilson 150 foot solar tower scale. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 156, 295 – 310.
Ulrich, R.K.: 1992, Analysis of magnetic fluxtubes on the solar surface from observations at Mt. Wilson of A5250; A5233. In: Giampapa, M.S., Bookbinder, J.A. (eds.) Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ASP Conf. Ser. 26, 265.
Ulrich, R.K., Webster, L., Boyden, J.E., Magnone, N., Bogart, R.S.: 1991, A system for line profile studies at the 150-foot tower on Mount Wilson. Solar Phys. 135, 211 – 241.
Ulrich, R.K., Evans, S., Boyden, J.E., Webster, L.: 2002, Mount Wilson synoptic magnetic fields: Improved instrumentation, calibration, and analysis applied to the 2000 July 14 flare and to the evolution of the dipole field. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 139, 259 – 279.
Unno, W.: 1956, Line formation of a normal Zeeman triplet. Pub. Astron. Soc. Japan 8, 108.
Vernazza, J.E., Avrett, E.H., Loeser, R.: 1981, Structure of the solar chromosphere. III – Models of the EUV brightness components of the quiet-sun. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 45, 635 – 725.
Wang, Y.M., Sheeley, N.R.: 1995, Solar implications of ULYSSES interplanetary field measurements. Astrophys. J. 447, L143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ulrich, R.K., Bertello, L., Boyden, J.E. et al. Interpretation of Solar Magnetic Field Strength Observations. Sol Phys 255, 53–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9302-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9302-9