Abstract
Starting with a large number (N=100) of Wind magnetic clouds (MCs) and applying necessary restrictions, we find a proper set of N=29 to investigate the average ecliptic plane projection of the upstream magnetosheath thickness as a function of the longitude of the solar source of the MCs, for those cases of MCs having upstream shock waves. A few of the obvious restrictions on the full set of MCs are the need for there to exist a driven upstream shock wave, knowledge of the MC’s solar source, and restriction to only MCs of low axial latitudes. The analysis required splitting this set into two subsets according to average magnetosheath speed: slow/average (300 – 500 km s−1) and fast (500 – 1100 km s−1) speeds. Only the fast set gives plausible results, where the estimated magnetosheath thickness (ΔS) goes from 0.042 to 0.079 AU (at 1 AU) over the longitude sector of 0° (adjusted source-center longitude of the average magnetic cloud) to 40° off center (East or West), based on N=11 appropriate cases. These estimates are well determined with a sigma (σ) for the fit of 0.0055 AU, where σ is effectively the same as \(\sqrt{}\) (chi-squared) for the appropriate quadratic fit. The associated linear correlation coefficient for ΔS versus |Longitude| was very good (c.c.=0.93) for the fast range, and ΔS at 60° longitude is extrapolated to be 2.7 times the value at 0°. For the slower speeds we obtain the surprising result that ΔS is typically more-or-less constant at 0.040±0.013 AU at all longitudes, indicating that the MC as a driver, when moving close to the normal solar wind speed, has little influence on magnetosheath thickness. In some cases, the correct choice between two candidate solar-source longitudes for a fast MC might be made by noting the value of the observed ΔS just upstream of the MC. Also, we point out that, for the 29 events, the average sheath speed was well correlated with the quantity ΔV[=(〈V MC〉−〈V UPSTREAM〉)], and also with both 〈V MC〉 and 〈V MC,T〉, where 〈V MC〉 is the first one-hour average of the MC speed, 〈V MC,T〉 is the average MC speed across the full MC, and 〈V UPSTREAM〉 is a five-hour average of the solar wind speed just upstream of the shock.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Badruddin, M., Venkatesan, D., Zhu, B.Y.: 1991, Solar Phys. 134, 203 – 209.
Berdichevsky, D.B., Richardson, I.G., Lepping, R.P., Martin, S.F.: 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A09105. doi:10.1029/2004JA010662.
Burlaga, L.F.: 1988, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 7217 – 7224.
Burlaga, L.F.: 1995, Interplanetary Magnetohydrodynamics, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 89 – 114.
Burlaga, L.F., Sittler, E.C. Jr., Mariani, F., Schwenn, R.: 1981, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 6673 – 6684.
Fairfield, D.H.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 6700 – 6616.
Gopalswamy, N.: 2006, Space Sci. Rev. 124, 145 – 168.
Gopalswamy, N., Akiyama, S., Yashiro, S., Michalek, G., Lepping, R.P.: 2007, J. Atmos. Space-Terr. Phys. 70(2–4), 245 – 253. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.070.
Gosling, J.T., McComas, D.J.: 1987, Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 355 – 358.
Klein, L., Burlaga, L.F.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 613 – 624.
Lepping, R.P., Berdichevsky, D.: 2000, Recent Res. Devel. Geophys. 3, 77 – 96.
Lepping, R.P., Jones, J.A., Burlaga, L.F.: 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 11957 – 11965.
Lepping, R.P., Wu, C.-C., Berdichevsky, D.B.: 2005, Ann. Geophys. 23, 2687 – 2704. Sref-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2005-23-2687.
Lepping, R.P., Burlaga, L.F., Tsurutani, B.T., Ogilvie, K.W., Lazarus, A.J., Evans, D.S., Klein, L.W.: 1991, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 9425 – 9438.
Lepping, R.P., Berdichevsky, D., Szabo, A., Lazarus, A.J., Thompson, B.J.: 2002. In: Lyu, L.-H. (ed.) Space Weather Study Using Multipoint Techniques, Proceedings of the COSPAR Colloquium in Pacific Green Bay, Taiwan, 27 – 29 September 2000, Pergamon, Oxford, 87 – 96.
Lepping, R.P., Berdichevsky, D.B., Wu, C.-C., Szabo, A., Narock, T., Mariani, F., Lazarus, A.J., Quivers, A.: 2006, Ann. Geophys. 24(#1), 215 – 245. Sref-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2006-24-215.
Liu, Y., Richardson, J.D., Belcher, J.W., Kasper, J.C., Skoug, R.M.: 2006a, J. Geophys. Res. 111, A09108. doi:10.1029/2006JA011723.
Liu, Y., Richardson, J.D., Belcher, J.W., Wang, C., Hu, Q., Kasper, J.C.: 2006b, J. Geophys. Res. 111, A12S03. doi:10.1029/2006JA011890.
Marubashi, K.: 1986, Adv. Space Res. 6(6), 335 – 338.
Marubashi, K.: 1997, In: Crooker, N., Joselyn, J., Feynman, J. (eds.) Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 99, AGU, Washington, 147 – 156.
McComas, D.J., Gosling, J.T., Winterhalter, D., Smith, E.J.: 1988, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 2519 – 2526.
Morrison, P.: 1956, Phys. Rev. 101(#4), 1397 – 1404.
Owens, M.J., Cargill, P.J., Pagel, C., Siscoe, G.L., Crooker, N.U.: 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A01105. doi:10.1029/2004JA010814.
Riley, P., Crooker, N.U.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 600, 1035 – 1042.
Spreiter, J.R.: 1975, In: Ness, N.F. (ed.) NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Internal Document, Moscow, USSR, Nov. 17 – 21, 1975, NASA-SP-397, 135 – 149.
Spreiter, J.R., Summers, A.L., Alksne, A.Y.: 1966, Planet. Space Sci. 14, 223 – 253.
Russell, C.T., Mulligan, T.: 2002a, Planet. Space Sci. 50, 527 – 534.
Russell, C.T., Mulligan, T.: 2002b, Adv. Space Res. 29(#3), 301 – 306.
Webb, D.F., Lepping, R.P., Burlaga, L.F., DeForest, C.E., Larson, D.E., Martin, S.F., Plunkett, S.P., Rust, D.M.: 2000, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 27251 – 27259.
Wolfe, J.H.: 1972, In: Solar Wind 1, Asilomar Conference, March 21 – 26, 1971, 170 – 197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Lepping, R.P., Wu, CC., Gopalswamy, N. et al. Average Thickness of Magnetosheath Upstream of Magnetic Clouds at 1 AU versus Solar Longitude of Source. Sol Phys 248, 125–139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9111-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9111-6