Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived Economic Inequality Is Negatively Associated with Subjective Well-being through Status Anxiety and Social Trust

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between economic inequality and subjective well-being has produced mixed results in the literature. Conflicting evidence may be due to overlooking the role of psychosocial processes that translate socioeconomic conditions into subjective evaluations. We argue that perceiving high economic inequality erodes social capital, undermining people’s subjective well-being. We rely on the Psychosocial Model of Perceived Economic Inequality and Subjective Well-Being (PEISW), which posits that perceived economic inequality negatively affects subjective well-being by increasing status anxiety and decreasing social trust. Furthermore, these indirect effects from perceived inequality to subjective well-being will be moderated by system-justifying ideologies. The present article provides the first empirical test of this model using a national survey from Spain (N = 1,536). We confirmed that perceived economic inequality is negatively associated with well-being. We also found that perceived economic inequality had an indirect negative effect on subjective well-being via increasing status anxiety and reducing social trust. We found no evidence that system-justifying ideologies (i.e., social dominance orientation) moderated the association between perceived economic inequality and subjective well-being. We discuss that perceived economic inequality is crucial to understanding the link between economic inequality and subjective well-being and elaborate on the role of psychosocial mechanisms that promote competition and undermine social cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the construct “perceived inequality” instead of “subjective inequality” given that the perceived inequality capture a descriptive estimate about the extent of inequality, while subjective inequality cover a bifactorial construct that includes qualitative statements about inequality and fairness evaluations of such inequality (Schmalor & Heine, 2022).

  2. β = Standardized regression coefficient.

  3. Computed as the ratio of the indirect effects to the total effect (Hayes, 2022, p. 149), βTotal indirect / βTotal effect = − 0.053/ − 0.131.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Grants PID2022-140252NB-I00 and PID2022-140048NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, NORFACE Joint Research Programme on Democratic Governance in a Turbulent Age and co-funded by the Spain Research Agency [AEI, PCI2020-112285; PID2019-105643GB-I00], and the European Commission through Horizon 2020 under grant agreement No 822166. The sixth author of this manuscript received support from the University of Costa Rica (723-C4-004) and the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies-COES (ANID/FONDAP/15130009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efraín García-Sánchez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee from the University of Granada, No. 969/CEIH/2019, following the ethical standards of the institutional and national research guidelines, and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual involved in the study.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Open Science Practices

Data and materials used in this manuscript are publicly available at: https://osf.io/c8472/.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Sánchez, E., Matamoros-Lima, J., Moreno-Bella, E. et al. Perceived Economic Inequality Is Negatively Associated with Subjective Well-being through Status Anxiety and Social Trust. Soc Indic Res 172, 239–260 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03306-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03306-x

Keywords

Navigation