Abstract
People’s social participation is deeply rooted in social change and development. Based on the World Values Survey data from 1990 to 2018, this study analyzed the temporal trend of social participation across successive cohorts in China using the hierarchical age-period-cohort-cross-classified random effects model. The results show that social participation continued to fall among Chinese born before 1972 and then successively rose in the following cohorts. However, this cohort effect was mainly attributed to the participation in Olsonian associations, and it could be partly explained by people’s education attainment. The cohort effects of participation in three Olsonian associations, including trade unions, political associations and professional organizations, were similar to that of general social participation. The significant increase in social participation in cohorts born after the 1970s is mainly attributed to China’s socioeconomic and educational development, and a favorable environment for social development is a critical factor for civic social participation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In state corporatism framework, a strong state is needed, the actions of interest groups are limited, and the government usually intakes social organizations to help govern the country (Adams, 2019).
In the present study, cohort born before 1950 can be called the war cohort, cohort born during 1950–1976 can be called the planned economy cohort, and cohort born after 1976 can be called the reform cohort.
When using two cohort dummies in the model, cohort should not be a level-two variable. If so, there would be a multicollinearity problem, because the fixed-effect cohort dummies are directly computed based on the 12-group cohort variable (also used as random dummies not continuous in HAPC-CCREM), they do not have substantial or practical significance. We do not display the detailed specification of this multilevel model in the text, as it is similar to the specification of HAPC-CCREM.
References
Adams, P. S. (2019). Corporatism and comparative politics: is there a new century of corporatism? In H. J. Wiarda (Ed.), New directions in comparative politics (3rd edn). Colorado: Westview Press.
Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth: Declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development, 74, 333–351.
Chen, J. (2010). Corporation and contemporary Chinese society. Sociological Studies, 25(2), 30–43.
Chen, F. (2018). Civic engagenemnt and producing of social capital in China’s social transition. China Social Sciences Press.
Dong, X. (2013). 1992–2012: Chinese young people’s social participation. Youth Studies, 6, 80–91.
Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the Great Depression: Social change in life experience. University of Chicago Press.
Ge, D. (2011). The development of Chinese social organizations: from social subjects to state consciousness: the development of civil social organizations and the influence on ideological construction. Jiangsu Social Science, 3, 19–28.
Guo, Y., & Chang, A. (2005). Life cycle and social security: a sociological exploration into the life course of laid-off and unemployed workers. Social Sciences in China, 5, 93–107.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
Hall, P. A. (1999). Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 417–461.
Hu, A. (2014). Social participation, types of trust, and subjective wellbeing: Investigation based on CGSS2005. Journal of Social Sciences, 36(4), 64–72.
Huang, X. (2015). The institutional environment and development of contemporary Chinese social organizations. Social Sciences in China, 9, 146–164.
Huang, Y. (2018). Social capital and social trust in urban China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 4(4), 481–505.
Huang, Y. (2019). Social life and political trust in China: Searching for machers and schmoozers. International Political Science Review, 40(5), 694–709.
Jiang, T. (1999). 1949–1999: the evolution of Chinese youth’s social participation. China Youth Study, 4, 4–7.
Jiang, J., & Wang, P. (2018). Health status in a transitional society: urban-rural disparities from a dynamic perspective in China. Population Health Metrics, 16, e22.
Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, 117(3–4), 341–355.
Li, M., & Xu, J. (2014). Who benefits from China’s trade union? Economic Research Journal, 49(5), 49–62.
Li, Y. (2013). Social class and social capital in China and Britain: A comparative study. Social Inclusion, 1(1), 59–71.
Lin, N. (1995). Local market socialism: Local corporation in action in rural China. Theory and Society, 24(3), 301–354.
Ma, Q. (2002). The governance of NGOs in China since 1978: How much autonomy? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 305–328.
Mao, S. (2001). Political sociology. China Social Sciences Press.
Meng, X., & Gregory, R. G. (2002). The impact of interrupted education on subsequent educational attainment: A cost of the Chinese cultural revolution. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(4), 935–959.
Mintzberg, H. (2010). Mintzberg on Management. China Machine Press.
Ning, J. (2021). The main data of the seventh national census. Beijing.
O’Brien, R. M. (2015). Age-period-cohort models: Approaches and analyses with aggregate data. CRC Press.
O’Brien, R. M., Hudson, K., & Stockard, J. (2008). A mixed model estimation of age, period, and cohort effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(2), 402–428.
Offe, C., & Fuchs, S. (2002). A decline of social capital? The German case. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oi, J. C. (1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45(1), 99–126.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s decline in social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (1996). Bowling alone: Democracy in America at the end of the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nonetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Shen, J. (2009). The role played by young generation in the process of social change in China (outline). Paper presented at the The Fifth China Youth Development Forum, Beijing.
Skocpol, T. (2002). America: from membership to proposal. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sun, W. (2009). The development status, problems and suggestions of social organization in China. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 9, 33–35.
Unger, J., & Chan, A. (1995). China, corporatism, and the East Asian model. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33(33), 29–53.
Wang, T. (1997). Difficulties and solutions: an investigation on reemployment of laid-off workers in urban areas in China. Sociological Research, 6, 24–34.
Wang, M., & Jia, X. (2002). An analysis of the development of NGOs in China. Management World, 8, 30–43.
Wang, M., & Sun, W. (2011). Social organization management system: internal logic and developing trend. Chinese Public Administration, 7, 16–19.
Wang, B. (2012). Review on studies of social participation of contemporary Chinese. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)(6), 22–26.
Wang, R., Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Shen, L., Zhang, Z., & Wu, X. (2019). Melancholy or mah-jong? Diversity, frequency, type, and rural-urban divide of social participation and depression in middle- and old-aged Chinese: A fixed-effects analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 238, e112518.
Wang, L. (2011). The theoretical, empirical and policy research of the social participation of the elderly in China. Population and Development, 17(3), 35–43.
Wang, M. (2001). China society reform. Social Sciences Academic Press.
Wuthnow, R. (2002). America: communication privilege group and marginalized group? In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.
WVS. (2019). from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp
Yan, Y. (2010). The Chinese path to individualization. British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 489–512.
Yang, J., & He, T. (2015). Intergenerational mobility of education. World Economic Papers, 3, 32–42.
Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97.
Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2013). Age-period-cohort analysis: New models, methods, and empirical applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Zhang, H. (2009). 1949–2009: the characteristics and historical experience of Chinese youth’s social participation. China Youth Study, 10, 16–22.
Zhou, X. (2017). Chinese feeling: Globalization, social transformation and change of Chinese social mentality. Social Sciences Academic Press.
Zhuang, X., & Han, H. (2005). Classification control: research on the relationship between state and society in current mainland China. Sociological Research, 6, 73–89.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the useful help from Xiaolan Li (School of Sociology, Wuhan University) and Ling Zhang (School of Public Health, Wuhan University). We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their relevant comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, J., Wang, P. Which Generation is More Likely to Participate in Society? A Longitudinal Analysis. Soc Indic Res 162, 209–229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02830-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02830-4