Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Well-Being in Italian (Eco)regions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientific community has been studying for some time a measure capable of quantifying and monitoring the well-being of the population in the territories; this measure cannot be represented exclusively by economic components but also by dimensions that represent different domains of a mainly demographic-social nature. This paper aims to consider well-being from a multidimensional point of view and measure it for the 7983 Italian municipalities in order to highlight differences and similarities. To go down to such a fine territorial detail, it was necessary to use indicators implemented by administrative sources collected in a recently published portal. The application of composite indices allows a one-dimensional measurement that makes a complex phenomenon such as well-being more readable. From a territorial point of view, moreover, the work aims to overcome the administrative division already criticized in literature because it does not allow a reading corresponding to the real behaviors and lifestyles of citizens, embracing a classification more appropriate to the objective of the study. Since the elementary indicators taken into consideration are in some way influenced by reasons of proximity and/or territorial conformation, it was decided to use the classification in Ecoregions of Italy to assess whether the well-being, within the same municipality, “moves” in relation to the municipalities ecologically homogeneous. The results of the analyses present numerous aspects of originality in which the Ecoregions draw an interesting geography of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, R. G. (1983). Environmental management (Vol. 7, p. 365). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866919.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banini, T. (2013). Proporre, interpretare, costruire le identità territoriali. In: Identità territoriali. Questioni, metodi, esperienze a confronto. FrancoAngeli (pp. 9–27).

  • Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., Dei Ottati, G., & Sforzi, F. (2001). Il caleidoscopio dello sviluppo locale. Trasformazioni economiche nell’Italia contemporanea. Rosenberg & Sellier.

  • Calcagnini, G., & Perugini, F. (2019). A well-being indicator for the Italian provinces. Social Indicators Research, 142, 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1888-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daas, P., Ossen, S., Tennekes, M., Zhang, L-C., Hendriks, C., Foldal Haugen, K., Cerroni, F., Di Bella, G., Laitila, T., Wallgren, A., & Wallgren, B. (2011) Report on methods preferred for the quality indicators of administrative data sources. Second deliverable of workpackage 4 of the BLUE Enterprise and Trade Statistics project, September 28.

  • Diamantopulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, G. (2014), Il Progetto ARCHIMEDE obiettivi e risultati sperimentali. Istat Working Paper, n. 9.

  • Istat. (2015). BES 2015. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. http://www.Istat.it/it/files/2015/12/Rapporto_BES_2015.pdf.

  • Maggino, F., & Nuvolati, G. (2012). Quality of life in Italy. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. (2011). Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research (p. 45)., Social indicators research series Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one? Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, LXVII(2), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016). On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena. Social Indicators Research, 127, 983–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2018). Measuring well-being over time: The adjusted Mazziotta–Pareto index versus other non-compensatory indices. Social Indicators Research, 136, 967–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). How’s life in your region? Measuring regional and local well-being for policy making. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264217416-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is the result of the common work of the authors: in particular D. Bonardo has written Sects. 1, 3, 6 and V. Quondamstefano has written Sects. 2, 4 and 5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Quondamstefano.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonardo, D., Quondamstefano, V. Measuring Well-Being in Italian (Eco)regions. Soc Indic Res 161, 433–456 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02315-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02315-w

Keywords

Navigation