Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reshaping the Future of Social Metrology: Utilizing Quality Indicators to Develop Complexity-Based Scientific Human and Social Capital Measurement Model

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we made an effort to understand logic of management system standards with related thinking, and harness it to develop fractal model, focused on the scientific community. Therefore, we briefly explored the world of quality management and infrastructure, particularly its metrology with related concepts and vocabularies, in order to construct the new quality indicators and synthesize them to measure scientific human and social capital. This required us to discover utterly novel data sources, suitable to inform policy makers about changes regarding not only scientific results, but also attitudes, perceptions and behavior (ultimately, the Worldview) of scientists and researchers. The paper results with a proposal of a new social metrology model inspired by principles of the complexity theory and potentially capable of moving the whole process from aggregated macro statistics to smaller details, adjusted to the circumstances of the scientific communities. The novel, complexity-based model for measuring scientific human and social capital is explained through its seven main constructs (performances, metaphor, contexts, cultural, community, sustainable development and the Worldview) with belonging quality indicators and related stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(Source: personal, with the definitions of concepts from UNI 2003, ISO 2010 and ISO 2015)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anne, K. H. L., Sylvia, K. Y. Y., Kitty, K. Y. L., Kin, W. A. Y., & Kang, Y. L. (2017). Quality indicators to assess the end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Journal of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine,1(5), 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, L., Schaaper, M., & Felix, B. (2012). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft guidelines, model questionnaire and indicators, 3rd ed. OECD science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/07, OECD Publishing.

  • Ballard, E. G. (1948). Metaphysics and metaphor. The Journal of Philosophy,45(8), 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (1993). International comparisons of educational attainments. Journal of Monetary Economics,32, 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basili, V. R., Briand, L. C., & Melo, W. L. (1996). A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,22(10), 751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and simulation, histories of cultural materialism. The Body: University of Michigan Press. In Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy,70, 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. (1967). The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. The Journal of Political Economy,75, 352–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). The F-connection: Families, friends and firms and the organization of exchange. Population and Development Review, 6, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. O. (2005). Culture in a new scientific worldview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies,17, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1975). The problem with human capital theory-a Marxian critique. American Economic Review, 65, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy,33, 599–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management,22, 716–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braza, D. W. (2008). Quality Indicators. In S. J. Loue & M. Sajatovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of aging and public health. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping the score: Using the right metrics to drive world-class performance. New York: Quality Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. M., Braspenning, J., Hutchison, A., & Marshall, M. (2002). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Quality and Safety in Health Care,11, 358–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: The state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation,18, 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. (2003). At the border between chaos and order: What psychotherapy and neuroscience have in common. In J. Corrigall & H. Wilkinson (Eds.), Revolutionary connections: Psychotherapy and neuroscience. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J. J., IV. (2006). Overview of the structure of a scientific worldview. Journal of Religion and Science,41, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, N. (2012). Activities and Reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU: A Study on Facebook and ResearchGate. PLANNER-2012, Gangtok, Sikkim.

  • Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Education and economics: Disciplinary evolution and policy discourse. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, D. (1985). Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science. Scientometrics,7, 221–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education,80, 579–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review,3, 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology,94, S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, T. (2006). Quality thinking and systems thinking. The TQM Magazine,18(3), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology,13(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1968). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. American Sociological Review,34, 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M. M., Putnik, G. D., & Miranda, E. (2008). The Agile and Virtual University. In G. D. Putnik & M. M. Cruz-Cunha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of networked and virtual organizations (Vol. 3). Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. (1999). Complexity science: A Worldview shift. Emergence,1(4), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, V., & Woog, R. (2000). Making sense of social complexity through strange attractors. Paper presented at the international conference of systems thinking in management. Geelong: Deakin University.

  • Dinda, S. (2008). Social capital in the creation of human capital and economic growth: A productive consumption approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics,37(5), 2020–2033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djuric, M., & Filipovic, J. (2015). Human and social capital management based on complexity paradigm: Implications for various stakeholders and sustainable development. Sustainable Development,23, 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an alternative to the conventional materialist–individualist ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies,42, 705–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E. H., & Park, J. Z. (2009). Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,48, 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,12, 1143–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., Cheung, C., & Tehrani, K. (1998). Assessing spirituality through personal goals: Implications for research on religion and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research,45, 391–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research,132(2), 537–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulaki, A., Papilas, K., Paraskeva, A., & Patris, K. (2002). Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,46, 902–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipovic, J. (2012). Management of a diaspora virtual university as a complex organization: Serbian Diaspora Virtual University: An emerging leadership of a nation. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2005). Bowling alone: What’s the score? Social Networks,27(2), 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, M. (2018). Advancing social capital measurement: Using general social survey cycles to develop an efficient survey instrument. The American Sociologist,49(2), 392–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. Working Paper WP/00/74. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

  • Gallopin, G. (2002). Planning for resilience: Scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformation in human and nature systems. Washington, DC: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other peoples minds (leadership for the common good). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children,71(2), 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglia, E. (2011). Academic social networks: It’s time to change the way we do research. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine,47(2), 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends,50(3), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (reprinted 2006). New Jersey: Aldine Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2006). Statistics and science, technology and Innovation policy: How to get relevant indicators. Paper presented to the OECD Blue Sky II Conference “What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century”, Ottawa, Canada, 25–27 Sept 2006.

  • Godin, B., & Dore, C. (2005). Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension. Montreal: INRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudard, M. & Lubrano, M. (2010). Human capital, social capital and scientific production. Paper presented at the Conference “Measurement and Evaluation of Academic Research Performance: Policy Implications”, Braga, Portugal.

  • Hanson, B. (2008). OECD measures on human capital and potential use in educational accounts. Paper presented at the Meeting “Workshop on the Measurement of Human Capital”, Turin, Italy.

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership,61, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102, 16569–16572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. V. (1997). Quality in America: How to implement a competitive quality program. Chicago: Irwin Professional Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (2010). ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • ISO. (2015). ISO 9000: Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence. Melbourne: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. O. (1996). Qualitative research methods: Studying organizational symbolism. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics,77, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, S. L., McCullough, M. E., Kuhl, J., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2010). Why religion’s burdens are light: From religiosity to implicit self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review,14, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, L., & Woog, R. (2005). Vortical postmodern ethnography: Introducing a complexity approach to systemic social theorizing. System Research and Behavioral Science,22, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, D.-B. (2009). Human capital and its measurement. Paper presented to The 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Busan, Korea.

  • Kyriacou, G. A. (1991). Level and growth effects of human capital: A cross-country study of the convergence hypothesis. Working paper 91–26. New York: C.V. Starr Centre.

  • Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organization Studies,21, 487–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J. C. K., Walker, R. M., & Hills, P. (2014). Interdisciplinarity in sustainability studies: A review. Sustainable Development,22, 158–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2018). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? Social Indicators Research,135(3), 835–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Prologue: The development and evolution of research on social indicators and quality of life (QOL). In K. C. Land, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1995). Between “Paralysis by Analysis” and “Exinction by Instinct”. Sloan Management Review,36, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Jourda, M.-T., & Stofer, R. (2006). Organizational vs. personal social capital in scientists’ performance: A multi-level network study of elite French cancer researchers (1996–1998). Scientometrics,67(1), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubrano, M., Kirman, A., Bauwens, L., & Protopopescu, C. (2003). Ranking economics departments in Europe: A statistical approach. Journal of the European Economic Association,1, 1367–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,22, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research,36(1), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddocks, J., & Beaney, M. (2002). See the invisible and intangible. Knowledge Management, 16–17.

  • Maggino, F. (2017a). Dealing with syntheses in a system of indicators. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Complexity in society: From indicators construction to their synthesis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F. (2017b). Developing indicators and managing the complexity. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Complexity in society: From indicators construction to their synthesis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In K. C. Land, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannarini, T., & Fedi, A. (2018). Using quali-quantitative indicators for assessing the quality of citizen participation: A study on three citizen juries. Social Indicators Research,139(2), 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin,135, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J. P., Mirrlees, J. A., & Tirole, J. (2003). Evaluating economics research in Europe: an introduction. Journal of the European Economic Association,1, 1239–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehru, V., Swanson, E., & Dubey, A. (1995). A new database on human capital stock in developing and industrial countries: Sources, methodology and results. Journal of Development Economics,46, 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1980). Community of interest. Society,18(1), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF. (1957). Basic research: A national resource. NSF 57-35. U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington.

  • Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,36(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys,14(5), 629–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media and Society,11, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parts, E. (2003). Interrelationships between human capital and social capital: Implications for economic development in transition economies. University of Tartu, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. Working Paper Series No. 24, pp. 1–30.

  • Patton, S. M. (1993). Four days with W. Edwards Deming. Quality Digest,13, 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality,53, 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. The Republic. Translated by B. Jowett (2008). The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Republic, by Plato. From http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1497/1497-h/1497-h.htm. Retrieved Dec 30, 2018.

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology,24, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G., & Arriagada, A. M. (1986). The educational composition of the labor force: An international comparison. International Labor Review,125, 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in america. Political Science and Politics,28, 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology,118, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research,85(3), 515–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in awareness: Self, motivation, and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist,44, 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy,98, 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy,6, 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy,30, 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2017). The influence of science popularizers on the public’s view of religion and science: An experimental assessment. Public Understanding of Science,26(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics,19(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review,51, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciacovelli, L., & Plebani, M. (2009). The IFCC working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clinica Chimica Acta,404, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D. (2014). Bridging human capital and social capital theories. In M. Russ (Ed.), Value Creation, reporting, and signaling for human capital and human assets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature,34, 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNI (2003). UNI 11097: Quality management—Quality indicators and quality management synoptical tables—General guidelines. Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI).

  • Urban, W. M. (1938). Symbolism in science and philosophy. Philosophy of Science,5(3), 276–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. (1996). Measuring quality of academic journals and scientific productivity of researchers. New York: Mimeo Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S., Schmidt, A., & Walter, A. (2016). Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimes. Research Policy,45, 533–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Towards sustainable development. In Our common future. Chapter 2. UN Documents—Gathering a body of global agreements. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm. Retrieved Dec 30, 2018.

  • Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. STEP Leadership Workshop, University of Oregon.

  • Wheatley, M. J. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. G. (1997a). The postmodern paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romoszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 297–309). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. A. (1997b). Building social capital: A learning agenda for the twenty-first century. Urban Studies,34, 745–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, D. R. (1987). Screening models and education. In G. Psacharopoulos (Ed.), Economics of education: Research and studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,31, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodberry, R. D. (2012). The missionary roots of liberal democracy. American Political Science Review,106(2), 244–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer,15(2), 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Jove Ilića 154, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia

    Mladen Djuric, Jovan Filipovic & Stefan Komazec

Authors
  1. Mladen Djuric
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jovan Filipovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Komazec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mladen Djuric.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djuric, M., Filipovic, J. & Komazec, S. Reshaping the Future of Social Metrology: Utilizing Quality Indicators to Develop Complexity-Based Scientific Human and Social Capital Measurement Model. Soc Indic Res 148, 535–567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02217-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02217-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation