Advertisement

Better for Everyone? Egalitarian Culture and Social Wellbeing in Europe

  • Leonie C. SteckermeierEmail author
  • Jan Delhey
Article

Abstract

The goal of this study is to explore the relationship between culture and social well-being, focusing on inferiority feelings. While being respected is widely seen as a key ingredient of a good life, inferiority feelings signal a lack of esteem from others. Previous research has mainly looked at income inequality as the key contextual condition for inferiority feelings and other status concerns, often inspired by the income inequality thesis/Spirit Level paradigm (Wilkinson and Pickett 2010). We contribute to this discussion by extending this paradigm into the cultural realm. Our main assumption is that an inegalitarian culture breeds inferiority feelings, whereas an egalitarian culture dampens them and in this sense is “better”. Within a multi-level framework we combine information on culture, operationalized as collective values and beliefs, retrieved from the European Value Study for 30 European countries, and survey data on inferiority feelings for over 37,000 individuals from the most recent European Quality of Life Survey (2011–12). Our evidence suggests that widespread self-expression values and social trust (as expressions of an egalitarian culture) are indeed better as they dampen individuals’ inferiority feelings while widespread individual blame for poverty (an expression of an inegalitarian culture) heightens them. In further analyses of each income quintile separately, we find evidence that culture matters—for good or worse—for all income groups, except the poorest quintiles. Our results should prompt scholars of social status and social well-being to pay more attention to the impact of culture.

Keywords

Social wellbeing Status anxiety Values Beliefs Inequality European Quality of Life Survey 

References

  1. Böhnke, P. (2004). Perceptions of Social Integration and Exclusion in an Enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications for the European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. Bjornskov, Christian. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjornskov, C. (2008). Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobbio, A., Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (2010). Conservative ideology, economic conservatism, and causal attributions for poverty and wealth. Current Psychology, 29(3), 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and social relations. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo, Rocio, Zheng, Yuhui, Kumar, Santosh, Olgiati, Analia, & Lisa, Berkman. (2012). Well-being and social capital on planet earth: Cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS ONE, 7, e42793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of status anxiety, distrust, and conflicts. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delhey, J., Schneickert, C., & Steckermeier, L. C. (2017). Sociocultural inequalities and status anxiety: Redirecting the spirit level theory. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58(3), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delhey, J., & Steckermeier, L. C. (2016). The good life, affluence and self-reported happiness: Introducing the good life index and debunking two popular myths. World Development, 88(2016), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eichhorn, J. (2013). Unemployment needs context: How societal differences between countries moderate the loss in life-satisfaction for the unemployed. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1657–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feagin, J. R. (1972). We still believe that god helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6(6), 101–129.Google Scholar
  15. Goldthorpe, J. (2009). Analysing social inequality: A critique of two recent contributions from economics and epidemiology. European Sociological Review, 26(6), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organization. software of the mind. intercultural cooperation and it importance for survival. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huppert, F. A., Marks, N., Clark, A. E., Siegrist, J., Stutzer, A., Vitters, J. V., et al. (2009). Measuring well-being across Europe: Description of the ESS well-being module and preliminary findings. Social Indicators Research, 91(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R., & Oyserman, D. (2004). Individualism, autonomy, and self-expression. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 74–96). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy the human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kallio, J., & Niemelä, M. (2013). Who Blames the Poor? European Societies, 16(1), 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lane, J.-E., & Svante, E. (2002). Culture and politics. A comparative approach. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Layte, R. (2012). The association between income inequality and mental health: Testing status anxiety, social capital, and neo-materialist explanations. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Layte, R., & Whelan, C. (2014). Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lepianka, D. (2007). Are the poor to be blamed or pitied? A comparative study of popular poverty attributions in Europe. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  27. Lepianka, D., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2010). Popular explanations of poverty in Europe. Effects of contextual and individual characteristics across 28 European countries. Acta Sociologica, 53(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindemann, K., & Saar, E. (2014). Contextual effects on subjective social position: Evidence from European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Little, R. J. A. (1988). Missing-data adjustments in large surveys. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 6(3), 287–296.Google Scholar
  30. Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. London/Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Royston, P. (2014). Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman, K. S., & Ellis, C. (1999). “There’s no shame in my game”: Status and stigma among Harlem’s working poor. In M. Lamont (Ed.), The cultural territories of race: Black and white boundaries (pp. 151–181). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nolan, P., & Lenski, G. (2004). Human societies. An introduction to macrosociology. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Offer, A. (2006). The challenge of affluence. Self-control and well-being in the United States and Britain since 1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Paskov, M., Gerxhani, K., & Van de Werfthorst, H. G. (2017). Giving Up on the Joneses? The Relationship between income inequality and status-seeking, European Sociological Review, 33(1), 112–123.Google Scholar
  37. Philips, D. (2006). Quality of life. Concept, policy and practice. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Präg, P., Mills, M., & Wittek, R. P. M. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status and health in cross-national comparison. Social Science and Medicine, 149(2016), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Proto, E., & Rustichini, A. (2013). A reassessment of the relationship between GDP and life satisfaction. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rosanvallon, P. (2013). The society of equals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosar, U. (2004). Ethnozentrismus und Immigration. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Deutschland in Europa. Ergebnisse des European Social Survey 2002-2003 (pp. 77–101). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  44. Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all. Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 4(1), 87–94.Google Scholar
  46. Saunders, P., & Evans, N. (2010). Beware false prophets. Equality, the good society and the spirit level. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  47. Schimank, Uwe, Groh-Samberg, Olaf, & Mau, Steffen. (2014). Statusarbeit unter Druck? Zur Lebensführung der Mittelschichten. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz-Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sennett, R. (2003). Respect in a world of inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  50. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  51. Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(6), 855–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skidelsky, R., & Skidelsky, E. (2013). How much is enough? Money and the good life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  53. Snowdon, C. (2010). The spirit level delusion: fact-checking the left's new theory of everything. Ripon, North Yorkshire: Little Dice.Google Scholar
  54. Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soroka, S., Johnston, R., & Banting, K. (2007). Ethnicity, trust, and the welfare state. In R. Johnston & F. Kay (Eds.), Social capital, diversity, and the welfare state (pp. 279–303). Vancouver/Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stam, K., Sieben, I., Verbakel, E., & de Graaf, P. M. (2016). Employment status and subjective well-being: The role of the social norm to work. Work, Employment & Society, 30(2), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stavrova, O., Schlösser, T., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2011). Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. The World Bank, World Development Indicators (2016). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) [NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD].Google Scholar
  60. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  61. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Deurzen, I., van Ingen, E., & van Oorschot, W. J. H. (2015). Income inequality and depression: The role of social comparisons and coping resources. European Sociological Review, 31(4), 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Oorschot, W. (2005). Immigrants, Welfare and Deservingness: Opinions in European Welfare States. Aalborg University: Centre for Comparative Welfare Studies, Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration.Google Scholar
  64. Van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European social policy, 16(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Oorschot, W., & Halman, L. (2000). Blame or fate, individual or social? An international comparison of popular explanations of poverty, European Societies, 2(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  66. Veblen, T. (1953 [1899]). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions, the mentor edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values: A civicness test. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising. Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Welzel, C., & Delhey, J. (2015). Generalizing trust: The benign force of emancipation. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 46(7), 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilkinson, R. (2005). The impact of inequality: How to make sick societies healthier. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why more equal societies always do better. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social Sciences, Otto von Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations