Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dimensionality and Validation of the Dispositional Hope Scale in a Spanish Sample

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hope has emerged as a central construct when discussing human psychological strengths, well-being and quality of life. The first and most used instrument presented to measure the construct was the dispositional hope scale (DHS). Nevertheless, its underlying factor structure is still under debate. This research presents the first translation into Spanish and also the first validation of the DHS in Spanish speaking population. Specifically, the aim is to systematically test for the competitive models of the DHS. Four confirmatory factor analyses were tested: unidimensional, non-hierarchical multidimensional, second-order, and bifactor models; on a sample of 242 Spanish university students. Estimations of internal consistency, factorial and nomological validity are presented. Among the different structures collected along the literature and tested in this research, a unidimensional model has been found as the best structure to represent the answers to the scale. This study offers the first presentation and validation of a Spanish version of the DHS, offering evidence of adequate psychometric properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes. Psicothema, 12(2), 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., Catlin, G., & Chon, K. K. (1990). Rules of hope. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Babyak, M. A., Snyder, C. F., & Yoshinobu, L. (1993). Psychometric properties of the Hope scale: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. C., & Snyder, C. R. (2007). Satisfaction with life and hope: A look at age and marital status. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2010). Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 944–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. J., Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., & Cella, D. (1999). The expanded version of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—Spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp-Ex): Initial report of psychometric properties. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D., Meijer, R. R., Weekers, A. M., & Baneke, J. J. (2008). On the dimensionality of the dispositional hope scale. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, and discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 15, 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canada, A. L., Murphy, P. E., Fitchett, F., Peterman, A., & Schover, L. R. (2008). A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 908–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Shen, H., & Li, X. (2009). Reliability and validity of adult dispositional hope scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. G., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farran, C. J., Herth, A. K., & Popovich, J. M. (1995). Hope and hopelessness: Critical clinical constructs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gana, K., Daigre, G., & Ledrich, J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the French version of the adult dispositional hope scale. Assessment, 20, 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, K. A., & Kwon, P. (2010). Rumination and depressive symptoms: Evidence for the moderating role of hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R., Dooley, J., & Florell, D. (2006). Relative levels of hope and their relationship with academic and psychological indicators among adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(2), 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halama, P. (2010). Hope as a mediator between personality traits and life satisfaction. Studia Psychologica, 52, 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 159–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T., & Snyder, C. R. (2005). The relationship between hope and subjective well-being: Reliability and validity of the dispositional hope scale, Japanese version. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 76, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemer, G., & Atic, G. (2012). Hope and social support in high school students from urban and rural areas of Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 901–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. (2012). Predictors of positive psychological strengths and subjective well-being among north Indian adolescents: Role of mentoring and educational encouragement. Social Indicators Research, 114, 1285–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 32(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. J., Ciarlelli, R., Coffman, L., Stone, M., & Wyatt, L. (2000). Diagnosing for Strengths: On Measuring Hope Building Blocks. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope: Theory, measures and applications (pp. 57–85). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, S. C., Lopez, S. J., & Mitchell, J. (2013). The role of hope, spirituality and religious practice in adolescents’ life satisfaction: Longitudinal findings. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraitou, D., Kolovou, C., Papasozomenou, C., & Paschoula, C. (2006). Hope and adaptation to old age: Their relationship with individual-demographic factors. Social Indicators Research, 76, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, G. (2011). The Relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among undergraduates. Social Indicators Research, 101, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvick, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, S. C., & Vaughn, A. A. (2006). Evidence for the factorial validity of the dispositional hope scale. Cross-ethnic and cross-gender measurement equivalence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancho, P., Galiana, L., Gutiérrez, M., Francisco, E. H., & Tomás, J. M. (2014). Validating the Portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale in an elderly sample. Social Indicators Research, 115, 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scioli, A., Ricci, M., Nyugen, T., & Scioli, E. R. (2011). Hope: Its nature and measurement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(2), 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991a). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., et al. (1997). The development and validation of the children’s hope scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Irving, L., & Anderson, J. R. (1991b). Hope and health: Measuring the will and the ways. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 285–305). Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Mann Pulvers, K., Adams, V. H, III, & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

  • Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, M. F., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). An analysis of hope as a psychological strength. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. S., & Lim, T. (2009). Hope versus optimism in Singaporean adolescents: Contributions to depression and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 648–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Galiana.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 English and Spanish versions of the dispositional hope scale

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galiana, L., Oliver, A., Sancho, P. et al. Dimensionality and Validation of the Dispositional Hope Scale in a Spanish Sample. Soc Indic Res 120, 297–308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0582-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0582-1

Keywords

Navigation