Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic Status, Income Inequality, and Health Complaints: A Basic Psychological Needs Perspective

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) and income inequality are now recognized as important determinants of health, and there is growing interest in uncovering the intermediary psychosocial pathways through which the socioeconomic context affects physical well-being (Marmot in The status syndrome: how social standing affects our health and longevity, Henry Holt, New York, 2004; Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level: why more equal societies almost always do better, Allen Lane, London, 2009). We adopted the applied framework of self-determination theory (SDT; Deci and Ryan in Psychol Inq 11:227–268, 2000) and hypothesized that fulfillment of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness would mediate the relationships that SES and income inequality have to self-rated health. An online community sample of American participants (N = 1,139) completed a detailed demographic survey and provided self-reports of need fulfillment and health complaints. Structural equation models controlled for impression management and self-deceptive enhancement. Controlling for sex and age, need fulfillment was predicted positively by subjective SES and objective household income and negatively by state-level income inequality; in turn, need fulfillment predicted lower levels of health complaints. These findings suggest that SDT provides a useful framework for the study of SES, income inequality, and health, and that basic psychological needs are an important mechanism through which socioeconomic contexts influence health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this regard, it is worth noting that the SMUHQ contains items for common health symptoms and minor illnesses as well as items for more serious and chronic health problems. In the Supplemental Materials we consider a more nuanced set of analyses using participants’ responses on this instrument. These ancillary analyses are detailed in the Supplemental Materials, pp. 6–13. The results of these ancillary analyses do not substantively differ from those obtained from our main models.

References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Healthy Psychology, 19, 586–592. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. E., & Ostrove, J. M. (1999). Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don’t. In N. E. Adler, M. G. Marmot, B. S. McEwen, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 896: Socioeconomic status and health in industrial nations: Social, psychological, and biological pathways (pp. 3–15). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. E., & Snibbe, A. C. (2003). The role of psychosocial processes in explaining the gradient between socioeconomic status and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 119–123. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459–1473. doi:10.117/0146167211413125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 3–5. doi:10.1177/17456916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, S. J., Gilfillan, P., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). Living inferiority. British Medical Bulletin, 69, 49–60. doi:10.1093/bmb/Idh003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, R., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2011). Income inequality and personality: Are less equal U.S. states less agreeable? Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1978–1985. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. doi:10.1037/a0018066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2006). Structural equation modeling with the sem package in R. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 465–486. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller-Rowell, T. E., Evans, G. W., & Ong, A. D. (2012). Poverty and health: The mediating role of perceived discrimination. Psychological Science, 23, 734–739. doi:10.1177/0956797612439720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223. doi:10.1023/A:1025007614869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Bhave, D. (2011). Autonomy in the workplace: An essential ingredient to employee engagement and well-being in every culture. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 163–187). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: Do negative emotions play a role? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 10–151. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, D. P., & Smith, J. P. (2002). Can patient self-management help explain the SES health gradient? In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA (Vol. 99, pp. 10929–10934). doi:10.1073/pnas.162086599.

  • Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2011). Capitalism and autonomy. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 191–207). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 763–773. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan, S., Kuppens, P., Allik, J., Balazs, K., de Lemus, S., Dumont, K., et al. (2012). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22, 1254–1258. doi:10.1177/0956797611417003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.1080/19416520802211628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. G. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. G. (2006). Status syndrome: A challenge to medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 1304–1307. doi:10.1001/jama.295.11.1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., et al. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7, 325–340. doi:10.1177/1745691612447309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, A. (2011). Household income for states: 2009 and 2010: American community survey briefs. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100. doi:10.1177/0956797611417262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1982). The psychology of physical symptoms. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prottas, D. (2008). Do the self-employed value autonomy more than employees? Research across four samples. The Career Development International, 13, 33–45. doi:10.1108/-13620430810849524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quested, E., Bosch, J. A., Burns, V. E., Cuming, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2011). Basic psychological need satisfaction, stress-related appraisals, and dancers’ cortisol and anxiety responses. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2011(33), 828–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Cortisol reactivity to a teacher’s motivating style: The biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 63–74. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9204-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. doi:10.1177/0146167200266002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95–122. doi:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1585. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 439–451. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II Study. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1321–1333. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of Negative Affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., & Resnicow, K. (2011). Physical wellness, heath care, and personal autonomy. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 133–162). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano I. Di Domenico.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Domenico, S.I., Fournier, M.A. Socioeconomic Status, Income Inequality, and Health Complaints: A Basic Psychological Needs Perspective. Soc Indic Res 119, 1679–1697 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0572-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0572-8

Keywords

Navigation