Skip to main content
Log in

Family Structure and Subjective Economic Well-Being: Some New Evidence

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates the main socio-demographic and economic determinants of subjective economic well-being in different typologies of households. Previous studies have used dummy variables to explore the effect of family structure. In this paper, however four different models—one for each family typology—have been estimated to test if each selected explanatory variable is significant and how it acts in determining the level of subjective economic well-being. To achieve this, we apply an under-used logit model—the partial proportional ordered model. Our analysis, based on data from the 2005 Italian Survey on Income and Living Conditions highlights the main variables affecting the subjective economic well-being of all household typologies. These main variables are related to income adequacy, such as being able to afford housing, clothes and holidays, and also include the work-status and level of education of the respondent. These variables produce notable differences in the level of subjective economic well-being. We find that couples with no children have the highest level of perceived economic well-being, while couples with two or more children and even more so one-person households are more economically insecure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We would like to thank an anonymous referee to have suggested us to point out this evidence.

  2. Originally, the answer was on 6-point scale but due to the low percentage of observations in the points 1, 5, and 6 a re-coding to a 3-point scale has been done.

  3. To check the parallel-lines constraint the autofit option of GOLOGIT procedure of STATA software was followed. This STATA procedure does a series of Wald tests on each variable to see whether its coefficients differ across equations, e.g., whether the variable meets the parallel-lines assumption. If the Wald test is statistically insignificant for one or more variables, the variable with the least significant value on the Wald test is constrained to have equal effects across equations. A global Wald test is also done of the final model with constraints versus the original unconstrained model; a statistically insignificant test indicates that the final model does not violate the parallel-lines assumption.

    To estimate our model, we use GOLOGIT2 routine made by Richard Williams. For more details on this routine see Williams (2006a, b).

References

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T., & Brandolini, A. (2004). The age of discontent: Italian households at the beginning of the decade. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 63(3–4), 449–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonke, J., & Browning, M. (2009). The distribution of financial well-being and income within the household. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli, B., Lecchini, L., & Masserini, L. (2002). An ordinal logit model for subjective well-being among the Italian older adults. In J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, & P. Smidt (Eds.), Social Science methodology in the New Millennium, (CDrom). Germany: Leske & Budrich, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life Satisfaction: An attempt to order satisfaction relationship. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, G., & Maltagliati, M. (2004). Equivalence scale: A fresh Look at an old problem. Theory and empirical evidence. In C. Dagum & G. Ferrari (Eds.), Household behaviour, equivalent scales, welfare and poverty (pp. 29–53). New York: Physica–Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, G. (2004). Using equivalent scales as spatial deflators: evidence in inter-household welfare regional comparison from Italian HBS micro-data. In C. Dagum & G. Ferrari (Eds.), Household behaviour, equivalent scales, welfare and poverty (pp. 273–294). New York: Physica–Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, G., & Maltagliati, M. (2009). Cross region and economic profile of Italian Households well-being comparisons. Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica, LXIII(1–2), 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro Luzzi, G., Flückiger, Y., & Weber, S. (2008). A cluster analysis of multidimensional poverty in Switzerland. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 63–79). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, A. S., & Xu, J. (2012). The proportional odds with partial proportionality constraints model for ordinal response variables. Social Sciences Research, 41, 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, A., & Dickes, P. (2008). The Rasch model and multidimensional poverty measurement. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 49–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A., & van Praag, B. M. S. (1977). The poverty line: Concept and measurement. Journal of Human Resources, 12, 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M., & Andrew, M. (2006). Another look at the stratification of educational transitions: The logistic response model with partial proportionality constraints. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayo, B., & Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective economic well-being in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. The Economic Record, 80, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2009). Rapporto annuale. Roma: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A. (1994). The measurement of household cost functions. Revealed preference versus subjective measures. Journal of Population Economics, 7, 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A., Kooreman, P., & Willemse, R. (1988). Some methodological issues in the implementation of subjective poverty definitions. Journal of Human Resources, 23, 222–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, R., Campbell, M. J., Walters, S. J., Morgan, K., & MRC CFAS Co-operative Institute of Public Health. (2002). A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K., Stewart, S. D., Wilson, J., & Korsching, P. F. (2010). Perceptions of financial well-being among American women in diverse families. Journal of Family and Economic Issue, 31, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massari, R., Pittau, M. G., & Zelli, R. (2009). A dwindling middle class? Italian evidence in the 2000s. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 7, 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirò, A. (2006). Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: Some international evidence. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B., & Harrell, F. E. (1990). Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Applied Statistics, 39, 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintano, C., Castellano, R., & Regoli, A. (2009). Evolution and decomposition of Income Inequality in Italy, 1991–2004. Statistical Methods and Applications, 18(3), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravaillon, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. European Economic Review, 46, 1453–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. (2001). The relationship between income and satisfaction: The effect of measurement error and suppressor variables. Social Indicators Research, 53, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seghieri, C., De Santis, G., & Tanturri, M. L. (2006). The richer, the happier? An empirical investigation in selected European countries. Social Indicators Research, 79, 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selezneva, E. (2011). Surveying transitional experience and subjective well being: Income, work, family. Economic Systems, 35, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2004). Reported subjective well-being: A challenge for economic theory and economic policy. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124, 191–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoorn, A. (2007). A short introduction to subjective well-being: its measurement, correlates and policy uses. International conference “Is happiness measurable and what do those measures mean for policy. Rome, University of Tor Vergata.

  • van Praag, B. M. S. (1968). Individual welfare functions and consumer behaviour: A theory of rational irrationality. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B. M. S. (1971). The welfare function of income in Belgium, an empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 2, 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). The Subjective approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 135–154). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B. M. S., Frijtersvan, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 51, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B. M. S., Goedhart, T., & Kapteyn, A. (1980). The poverty line—A pilot survey in Europe. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B. M. S., & Kapteyn, A. (1973). Further evidence on the individual welfare function of income: An empirical investigation in The Netherlands. European Economic Review, 4(1), 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Toscano, E., Ateca-Amestoy, V., & Serrano-del-Rosal, R. (2006). Building financial satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 77, 211–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2006a). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2006b). Review of regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, second edition, by Long and Freese. Stata Journal, 6(2), 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to four anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The authors acknowledge the University of Palermo for financial support (FFR Project 2012–2013). Although this is a joint paper, Sects. 1 and 5 are attributed to Miranda Cuffaro, Sects. 2 and 4 to Maria Francesca Cracolici, and Sect. 3 is attributed to Francesca Giambona.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Francesca Cracolici.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cracolici, M.F., Giambona, F. & Cuffaro, M. Family Structure and Subjective Economic Well-Being: Some New Evidence. Soc Indic Res 118, 433–456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0425-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0425-5

Keywords

Navigation