Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chronic and Transient Poverty and Vulnerability to Poverty in the Philippines: Evidence Using a Simple Spells Approach

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses panel data and two welfare indicators, namely per capita expenditure and per capita food expenditure, to determine the frequency that the households enter poverty and food poverty in the Philippines. Unlike other studies, this paper attributes similar factors to explain transient and chronic poverty but finds that these factors are more pronounced for the chronic case. Significant factors that contribute to both chronic and transient poverty and food poverty are the household heads’ low educational level, affiliation in economically unstable and risky occupations such as those in the agriculture, fishery and resource sectors and those who are unskilled laborers, the lack of health insurance and high dependency burden. The paper also finds that that vulnerability to poverty and food poverty in the Philippines is high especially in the rural districts and areas with armed conflict. Households that experience higher earnings, new job, abundant harvest, better health or receipt of remittance/inheritance are less likely to be chronically poor. Shocks related to labor market affect both transient and chronic food poverty while natural calamities or health deterioration of any household member increase the probability of the household falling into chronic food poverty. Policy suggestions to address both types of poverty are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Lim (2009) for a comprehensive discussion of the Philippine government’s anti-poverty program.

  2. Barangay is the basic political unit in the Philippines and is roughly equivalent to a village.

  3. The discussion here is largely taken from http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/FAQs/default.asp.

  4. Equal to1 if participated in the succeeding wave and equal to 0 if not.

  5. Available from the corresponding author upon request.

  6. Composed of Agusan del Norte, Agusan del Sur, Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur and Dinagat Islands.

  7. Composed of Mindoro, Marinduque, Romblon and Palawan.

  8. Composed of Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal and Quezon.

References

  • Balisacan, A. (2003a). Poverty and inequality. In A. Balisacan & H. Hill (Eds.), The Philippine economy: Development, policies, and challenges. New York: Oxford University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balisacan, A. (2003b). Poverty comparison in the Philippines: Is what we know about the poor robust? In C. Edmonds (Ed.), Reducing poverty in Asia: Emerging issues in growth, targeting, and measurement. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balisacan, A. (2007). Why does poverty persist in the Philippines? Facts, fancies and policies. Agricultural and development discussion paper series, no. 2007–1. Laguna, Philippines: SEARCA.

  • Balisacan, A., & Pernia, E. (2002). The rural road to poverty reduction: Some lessons from the Philippine experience. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 37(2), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. (1986). Slipping into and out of poverty: The dynamics of dpells. The Journal of Human Resources, 21(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devicienti, F. (2002). Estimating poverty persistence in Britain. Center for employment studies working paper series no. 1.

  • Duclos, J. (2002). Vulnerability and poverty: A few distinctions. http://www.pep-net.org/fileadmin/medias/pdf/I-vulnerability-poverty-duclos.pdf.

  • Finnie, R., & Sweetman, A. (2003). Poverty dynamics: Empirical evidence for Canada. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(2), 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, S. and S. Jenkins (1995). Do the poor stay poor? New evidence about income dynamics from the British household panel survey. ESRC research centre on micro-social change discussion paper.

  • Jarvis, S. (1997). Low income dynamics in 1990s Britain. Fiscal Studies, 18(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S., Schluter, C., & Wagner, G. (2003). The dynamics of child poverty in Britain and Germany compared. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34(3), 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. (2009). Evaluating chronic poverty reduction strategies in the Philippines. Working paper 2009-138, Manchester, UK: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

  • Mangahas, M. (2008). SWS monitoring of self-rated poverty. Completed paper for the PIDS-NEDA-UNDP project comprehensive documentation and analysis of issues on the official poverty estimation methodology of the Philippines, Quezon City: Social Weather Stations.

  • Mangahas, M. and Guerrero, L. (2012). Tracking suffering and economic deprivation in the Philippines over time. In Presented at the 65th Annual WAPOR conference in Hong Kong, June 14–16, 2012.

  • Miller, R. and C. Hollist (2007). Attrition bias. In Neil Salkind (Ed.), Published in encyclopedia of measurement and statistics 3 vols (Vol. 1) (pp. 57–60). Thousand Oaks: Sage Reference.

  • Miller, R., & Wright, W. (1995). Detecting and correcting attrition bias in longitudinal family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(4), 921–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, C. (2003). The poverty fight: has it made an impact? Perspective paper series No.2, Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

  • Reyes, C., Tabuga, A., Mina, C., Asis, R., & Datu, M. (2010). Chronic and transient poverty. Discussion paper series No. 2010-30, Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

  • Rodgers, J., & Rodgers, J. (1993). Chronic poverty in the United States. The Journal of Human Resources, 28(1), 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavo-Campo, S. & Judd, M. (2005). The Mindanao conflict in the Philippines: Roots, costs and potential peace dividend. World Bank conflict prevention and reconstruction, social development papers, paper no. 24, Washington: World Bank.

  • Stevens, H. (1999). Climbing out of poverty, falling back in: Measuring the persistence of poverty over multiple spells. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(3), 557–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Measuring vulnerability. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTPA/0contentMDK:20238993~menuPK:492141~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:430367,00.html.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Institute of the Philippine Culture for the 2011–2012 Merit Research Award and the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connie Bayudan-Dacuycuy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayudan-Dacuycuy, C., Lim, J.A. Chronic and Transient Poverty and Vulnerability to Poverty in the Philippines: Evidence Using a Simple Spells Approach. Soc Indic Res 118, 389–413 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0409-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0409-5

Keywords

Navigation