Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Quality of Life in Urban Areas (Case Study: Noorabad City, Iran)

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of urban life (QOUL) has become an important field within urban studies. The increased level of attention to this topic is due to the increasing importance of QoL studies in monitoring public policies and in the role they can play as effective tools in urban management and planning. The main objective of this study is to measure the QOUL in the town of Noorabad in Iran, using subjective and objective indicators. In addition to secondary datasets, this study relies on a perception survey of households in the selected city. Based on an 11-point Likert scale, the mean of the overall life satisfaction of the respondents was found to be 6.06. At the same time, it has been found that satisfaction from employment opportunities is lowest among all other indicators. The comparison between the subjective and objective QoL in Noorabad indicated that 25 % of the households are in a state of well-being, 30.1 % are in a state of deprivation, while 24.4 % are in dissonance and 20.4 % are in a state of adaptation. Although correlation between objective and subjective dimensions of the QoL has not been found to be high, in general, the findings of this study reveal the importance of simultaneous studying of both objective and subjective dimensions of QoL. Results and findings of this study will be useful in designing and implementing future policies in the town of Noorabad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \( n = {{\frac{{t^{2} pq}}{{d^{2} }}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\frac{{t^{2} pq}}{{d^{2} }}} {1 + \frac{1}{N}\left( {\frac{{t^{2} pq}}{{d^{2} }} - 1} \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {1 + \frac{1}{N}\left( {\frac{{t^{2} pq}}{{d^{2} }} - 1} \right)}}. \)

References

  • Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1998). Towards sustainable city policy: An economy environment technology nexus. Ecological Economics, 24, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: A public survey using the international wellbeing index. Social Indicator Research, 91, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1997). The comprehensive quality of life scale: Intellectual disability. (5th ed). Toorak: Deakin University School of Psychology.

  • Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, H., Williams, A., Abonyi, S., & Crooks, V. (2008). A mixed method approach to quality of life research: A case study approach. Social Indicator Research, 85, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, D. R., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 88, 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, M., & Canova, L. (2008). An assessment of the quality of life in the European Union based on the social indicators approach. Social Indicator Research, 87, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardi, P., & Pinter, L. (2006). City of Winnipeg quality of life indicators. In M. J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, & D. Swain (Eds.), Community quality of life indicators: Best cases 2 (pp. 127–176). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M., & Chung, W. (2003). Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 61, 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Statistics Center. (2006). Year book selected data. Accessed online at www.sci.org.ir/portal/faces/public/sci_en.

  • Johansson, S. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of life for national policy. Social Indicators Research, 58, 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, I. K., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. C. (1976). Quality of life indicators in U.S. metropolitan areas. New York: Prager Publishers.

  • Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. (2011). Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research. Social Indicators Research Series, 45, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R., Shyy, T. K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, A. (2006). Urbanization and the revolution: An introduction to the special issue. Cities, 23(6), 405–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G., Carruthers, J., & Cahill, M. (2004). Urban quality of life and public policy: A survey. In R. Capello & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Advances in urban economics (pp. 729–802). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.

  • Noll, H. -H. (2000). Social indicators and social reporting: the international experience. http://www.ccsd.ca/noll1.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2001.

  • Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research: A critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezvani, M. R., & Mansourian, H. (2011). Developing small cities by promoting village to town and its effects on quality of life for the local residents. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9921-7.

  • Rinner, C. (2007). A geographic visualization approach to multi-criteria evaluation of urban quality of life. International Journal Geographic Information Science, 21(8), 907–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, S., & Naude, W. (2008). The non-economic quality of life on a sub-national level in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 86, 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, L., & Martins, I. (2007). Monitoring urban quality of life: The Porto experience. Social Indicators Research, 80, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seik, F. T. (2001). Quality of life in cities. Cities, 18(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, C. S., Koo Lee, B., & Turner, S. (2000). A tale of three greenway trails: User perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E., & Shah, S. (2007). Neighborhood evaluation using GIS: An exploratory study. Environment and Behavior, 39, 583–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfazghi, E. S., Martinez, J. J., & Verplanke, J. J. (2009). Urban quality of life and its spatial distribution in Addis Ababa: Kirkos sub-city. Thesis for degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Specialisation: (Urban Planning and Management), Enschde, The Netherlands.

  • United Nations Population fund. (2007). State of world population 2007, unleashing the potential of urban growth. New York: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, B. N. (1986). Are we really measuring the quality of life? Well-being has subjective dimensions, as well as objective ones. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 43, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, W. (1984). Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und wahrgenommene Lebensqualität [Individual welfare: Living conditions and noticed quality of life]. In W. Glatzer & W. Zapaf (Eds.), Lebensqualita¨t in der Bundesrepublik. Objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlempfinden (pp. 13–26). Campus: Frankfurt am Main.

  • Zebardast, E. (2009). The housing domain of quality of life and life satisfaction in the spontaneous settlements on the Tehran metropolitan fringe. Social Indicators Research, 90, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Rezvani

  2. Geography and Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Hossain Mansourian & Mohammad Hossain Sattari

Authors
  1. Mohammad Reza Rezvani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossain Mansourian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Hossain Sattari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Rezvani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezvani, M.R., Mansourian, H. & Sattari, M.H. Evaluating Quality of Life in Urban Areas (Case Study: Noorabad City, Iran). Soc Indic Res 112, 203–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0048-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0048-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation