Abstract
Urban quality of life is usually measured by either subjective indicators using surveys of residents' perceptions, evaluations and satisfaction with urban living or by objective indicators using secondary data and relative weights for objective indicators of the urban environment. However, rarely are subjective and objective indicators of urban quality of life related to each other. In this paper, these two types of indicators were linked using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to both locate respondents to the “2003 Survey of Quality of Life in South East Queensland” and also to gather objective indicators about their urban environment within the region with regard to services, facilities and overcrowding. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), the strength of the relationships between these objective indicators and subjective indicators was examined. The results show that relationships between objective and subjective indicators of urban QOL can be weak, and suggests care should be taken when making inferences about improvements in subjective urban QOL based on improvements in objective urban QOL. However, further research is needed into the links between objective and subjective indicators of urban QOL including examining other aspects of the urban environment, non-linear relationships, and moderating effects for individual differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews F, Withey SB (1976) Social indicators of well-being: Americans perceptions of quality of life. Plenum, New York
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001a) Australian standard geographic classification. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001b) Census of population and housing: basic community profiles. Retrieved September 2004.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001c) 2001 Census dictionary. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra
Beattie P, Mackenroth T, Newman C (2004) Draft South East Queensland Regional Plan: for consultation. Queensland Government, Office of Urban Management, Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation, Brisbane
Blomquist GC, Berger MC, Hoehn JP (1988) New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. Am Econ Rev 78(1):89–107
Bowling A, Windsor J (2001) Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies 2:55–81
Boyer R, Savageau D (1981) Places rated almanac. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois
Campbell A, Converse P, Rodgers W (1976) The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. Sage, New York
Cicerchia A (1999) Measures of optimal centrality: indicators of city effect and urban overloading. Soc Indic Res 46:276–299
Cummins RA (2000) Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Soc Indic Res 52(1):55–72
DeNeve KM (1999) Happy as an extraverted clam? The role of personality for subjective well-being. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8(5):141–144
Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95(3):542–575
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125(2):276–302
Evans S, Huxley P (2002) Studies of quality of life in the general population. Int Rev Psychiatry 14(3):203–211
Goodchild MF (2000) New horizons for the social sciences: Geographic information systems. In: Social Sciences for a Digital World: building Infrastructure and Databases for the Future (Vol. 2004). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp. 163–172
Goodchild MF, Anselin L, Appelbaum RP, Harthorn BH (2000) Toward spatially integrated social science. Int Reg Sci Rev 23(2):139–159
Hayes N, Joseph S (2003) Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Pers Individ Differ 34(4):723–727
Headey B, Wearing A (1989) Personality, life events, and subjective well-being-toward a dynamic equilibrium-model. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(4):731–739
Headey B, Holmstrom E, Wearing A (1984) The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being. Soc Indic Res 15(3):203–227
Headey B, Veenhoven R, Wearing A (1991) Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc Indic Res 24(1):81–100
Kahneman D (1999) Objective happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage, New York
Lance CE, Lautenschlager GJ, Sloan CE, Varca PE (1989) A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. J Person 57(3):601–624
Marans RW, Rodgers W (1975) Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In: Hawley A, Rock, V (eds) Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective. Halsted, New York
McCrea R, Stimson R, Western J (2005) Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia. Soc Indic Res 72(2):121–152
Michalos AC, Zumbo BD (1999) Public services and the quality of life. Soc Indic Res 48(2):125–156
Rogerson R, Findlay AM, Morris AS, Coombes MG (1989) Indicators of quality of life – some methodological issues. Environ Plann A 21(12):1655–1666
Schwarz N, Strack F (1999) Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In: Kahneman D, Diener E (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage, New York, New York, pp. 61–84
Schwarz N, Strack F, Kommer D, Wagner D (1987) Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life – mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. Eur J Soc Psychol 17(1):69–79
Schwirian KP, Nelson AL, Schwirian PM (1995) Modeling urbanism – economic, social and environmental-stress in cities. Soc Indic Res 35(2):201–223
Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T (2001) Further validation of the Sirgy et al.'s measure of community quality of life. Soc Indic Res 56(2):125–143
Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T (2002) How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc Indic Res 59(1):79–114
Sirgy MJ, Rahtz DR, Cicic M, Underwood R (2000) A method for assessing residents' satisfaction with community-based services: a quality-of-life perspective. Soc Indic Res 49(3):279–316
Stover ME, Leven CL (1992) Methodological issues in the determination of the quality-of-life in urban areas. Urban Studies 29(5):737–754
Turksever ANE, Atalik G (2001) Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Soc Indic Res 53(2):163–187
Vitterso J, Nilsen F (2002) The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Soc Indic Res 57(1):89–118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCrea, R., Shyy, TK. & Stimson, R. What is the Strength of the Link Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life?. Applied Research Quality Life 1, 79–96 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-006-9002-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-006-9002-2