The Relationship Between Hope, Eustress, Self-Efficacy, and Life Satisfaction Among Undergraduates


The construct of eustress was studied alongside hope and self-efficacy, to explore how these constructs are related to life satisfaction among undergraduates. Questionnaires were administered to undergraduates to test the hypotheses that (1) as eustress levels increase, so will life satisfaction levels; (2) when eustress, hope, and self-efficacy are examined together, they will predict life satisfaction better than eustress alone; (3) eustress, hope, and self-efficacy will all be positively correlated with life satisfaction; and (4) self-efficacy will be the most positively correlated with life satisfaction. The results revealed a significant positive correlation between eustress and life satisfaction. A Hierarchical Linear Regression analysis revealed significant results supporting hypotheses 2 and 3, but not hypothesis 4. Results indicated that hope is the best predictor of life satisfaction. The work reported provides a reliable tool for measuring eustress, examines eustress in a new way at the academic level, and provides helpful information about student wellness to college administrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1


  1. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. The American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307–337). Retrieved in December 2008 from

  3. Benson, H., & Allen, R. (1980). How much stress is too much? Harvard Business Review, 58, 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). The hopeful optimist. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 288–290.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, E. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2000). A model of burnout and life satisfaction amongst nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gmelch, W. (1983). Stress for success: How to optimize your performance. Theory Into Practice, 22, 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hampton, N. (2000). Self-efficacy and quality of life in people with spinal cord injuries in China. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarus, R. (1990). Theory based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Fevre, M., Matheny, J., & Kolt, G. (2003). Eustress, distress, and interpretation in occupational stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 726–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovallo, W. (1997). Stress & health: Biological and psychological interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Magaletta, P., & Oliver, J. (1999). The hope construct, will, and ways: Their relations with self- efficacy, optimism, and general well being. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McGowan, J., Gardner, G., & Fletcher, R. (2006). Positive and negative affective outcomes of occupational stress. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Monk, E. M. (2004). Student mental health: The case studies. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 17, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quick, J. C., Quick, J. D., Nelson, D., & Hured, J. (1997). Preventative stress management in organizations. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. (1992). Self regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Selye, H. (1975). Stress without distress. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shaikh, B. T., & Deschamps, J. (2006). Life in a university residence: Issues, concerns, responses. Education for Health, 19, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simmons, B. (2000). Eustress at work: Accentuating the positive. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University. Retrieved November 22nd, 2008, from the Claremont Colleges Library Database.

  24. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stajkovic, A., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-Efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tennen, H., Afteck, G., & Tennen, R. (2002). Clipped feathers: The theory and measurement of hope. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Williams, J., & Coombs, T. (1996). An analysis of the reliability and validity of Bandura’s multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Annual meeting of the american educational research association. Retrieved April 24th, 2009 from the Claremont Colleges Library Database.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraldine O’Sullivan.


Appendix A

See Table 1.

Table 1 Demographics

Appendix B

See Table 2.

Table 2 Hope scale

Appendix C

See Table 3.

Table 3 Eustress scale

Appendix D

See Table 4.

Table 4 Self-efficacy scale

Appendix E

See Table 5.

Table 5 Life satisfaction scale

Appendix F

See Table 6.

Table 6 Stress scale

Appendix G

See Table 7.

Table 7 Means and standard deviations for all variables

Appendix H

See Table 8.

Table 8 Correlation matrix for all variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, G. The Relationship Between Hope, Eustress, Self-Efficacy, and Life Satisfaction Among Undergraduates. Soc Indic Res 101, 155–172 (2011).

Download citation


  • Eustress
  • Hope
  • Self-efficacy
  • Life satisfaction
  • Well-being