Skip to main content
Log in

A fast algorithm for prestack Gaussian beam migration adopting the steepest descent approximation

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past, prestack Gaussian beam migration adopted the steepest descent approximation to reduce the dimension of the integrals and speed up the computation. However, the simplified formula by the steepest descent approximation was still in the frequency domain, and it had to be evaluated at each frequency. To solve this problem, we present a fast algorithm by changing the order of the integrals. The innermost integral is regarded as a two-dimensional continuous function with respect to the real part and the imaginary part of the total traveltime. A lookup table corresponding to the value of the innermost integral is constructed at the sampling points. The value of the innermost integral at one imaging point can be obtained through interpolation in the constructed lookup table. The accuracy and efficiency of the fast algorithm are validated with the Marmousi dataset. The application to the Sigsbee2A dataset shows a good result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkhalifah T., 1995. Gaussian beam depth migration for anisotropic media. Geophysics, 60, 1474–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleistein N. and Gray S.H., 2010. Amplitude calculations for 3D Gaussian beam migration using complex-valued traveltimes. Inv. Probl., 26, 85017–85044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanta L. and Gray S.H., 2015. Converted-wave beam migration with sparse sources or receivers. Geophys. Prospect., 63, 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Červený V., Popov M.M. and Pšenčík I., 1982. Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media-Gaussian beam approach. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 70, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray S.H., 2005. Gaussian beam migration of common-shot records. Geophysics, 70, S71–S77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray S.H. and Bleistein N., 2009. True-amplitude Gaussian-beam migration. Geophysics, 74, S11–S23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale D., 1993a. Migration by the Kirchhoff, Slant Stack, and Gaussian Beam Methods. Report 126. Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale D., 1993b. Computational Aspects of Gaussian Beam Migration. Report 127. Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han F., Sun J. and Yang H., 2008. Ray-tracing of wavefront construction by bicubic convolution interpolation. J. Jilin Univ. (Earth Sci. Edition), 38, 336–340, 346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill N.R., 1990. Gaussian beam migration. Geophysics, 55, 1416–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill N.R., 2001. Prestack Gaussian-beam migration. Geophysics, 66, 1240–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H., Liu Y., Zheng Y., Liu X. and Lu H., 2016. Least-squares Gaussian beam migration. Geophysics, 81, S87–S100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveille J.P., Jones I.F., Zhou Z., Wang B. and Liu F., 2011. Subsalt imaging for exploration, production, and development: A review. Geophysics, 76, WB3–WB20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz J., 2001. Sigsbee2 synthetic subsalt data set: Image quality as function of migration algorithm and velocity model error. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.4606&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov M.M., 1982. A new method of computation of wave fields using Gaussian beams. Wave Motion, 4, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov M.M., Semtchenok N.M., Popov P.M. and Verdel A.R., 2010. Depth migration by the Gaussian beam summation method. Geophysics, 75, S81–S93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Versteeg R., 1994. The Marmousi experience: Velocity model determination on a synthetic complex data set. The Leading Edge, 13, 937–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadari N.E., 2015. True-amplitude vector-acoustic imaging: Application of Gaussian beams. Geophysics, 80, S43–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Y.B., Li Z.C., Qian Z.P., Zhang J.L., Sun P.Y. and Ma G.K., 2012. Amplitude-preserved Gaussian beam migration under complex topographic conditions. Chinese J. Geophys., 55, 1376–1383 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu T., Gray S.H. and Wang D., 2007. Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration in anisotropic media. Geophysics, 72, S133–S138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Z., Sun, J., Sun, H. et al. A fast algorithm for prestack Gaussian beam migration adopting the steepest descent approximation. Stud Geophys Geod 61, 575–586 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0929-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0929-y

Keywords

Navigation