Abstract
Extending the observation time to increase the length of time series is the most effective but consuming way to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of magnetotelluric (MT) signal. Multi-station superposition technique at present proposed for magnetotelluric survey aims to attenuate random noises by multi-station synchronously observation at one site. The idea stems from seismic array stacking and is mathematically verified corresponding to a linear random noise model. The multi-station superposition can be done in time and frequency domains. A practical testing measurement was performed by setting three stations on vertexes of an equilateral triangle and a single station on centre of the triangle in desert area of the Tarim basin, western China. The results of the testing data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme. The method has great potentials for long-period MT survey in dramatically reducing the observation time and suppressing the static shift caused by near-surface inhomogeneities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Booker J.R., Favetto A. and Pomposiello M.C., 2004. Low electrical resistivity associated with plunging of the Nazca flat slab beneath Argentina. Nature, 429, 399–403.
Chave A.D. and Thomson D.J., 1989. Some commends on magnetotelluric response function estimation. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 14215–14226.
Chen L., Booker J.R., Jones A.G., Wu N., Unsworth M.J., Wei W. and Tan H., 1996. Electrically conductive crust in southern Tibet from INDEPTH magnetotelluric surveying. Science, 274, 1694–1696.
Egbert G.D. and Booker J.R., 1986. Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 87, 173–194.
Egbert G.D., 2002. Processing and interpretation electromagnetic induction array data. Surv. Geophys., 23, 207–249.
Evans R.L., Hirth G., Baba K., Forsyth D., Chave A. and Mackie R., 2005. Geophysical evidence from the MELT area for compositional controls on oceanic plates. Nature, 437, 249–252.
Friedrichs B., 2007. MAPROS Software Manual. Metronix GmbH.
Gamble T.C., Goubau W.M. and Clarke J., 1979a. Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference. Geophysics, 44, 53–68.
Gamble T.C., Goubau W.M. and Clarke J., 1979b. Error analysis for remote reference magnetotellurics. Geophysics, 44, 959–968.
Goubau W.M., Gamble T.D. and Clarke J., 1978. Magnetotelluric data analysis: removal of bias. Geophysics, 43, 1157–1166.
Groom R.W. and Bailey R.C., 1991. Analytic investigations of the effects of near-surface threedimensional galvanic scatterers on MT tensor decompositions. Geophysics, 56, 496–518.
Horn R.A. and Johnson C.R., 1985. Matrix Analysis, 1st Edn., Vol.1. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Jones A.G., Chave A.D., Egbert G., Auld D. and Bahr K., 1989. A comparison of techniques for magnetotelluric impedance estimation. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 14201–14213.
Jones A.G., 1992. Electrical conductivity of the continental lower crust. In: Fountain D.M., Arculus R. and Kay R.W. (Eds.), Continental Lower Crust. Developments in Geotectonics, 23. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 81–143.
Jones A.G. and Ferguson I.J., 2001. The electric Moho. Nature, 409, 331–333, DOI: 10.1038/35053053.
Korja T., 2007. How is the European lithosphere imaged by magnetotellurics? Surv. Geophys., 28, 239–272, DOI: 10.1007/s10712-007-9024-9.
Nichols E.A., Morrison H.F. and Clarke J., 1988. Signals and noise in measurements of lowfrequency geomagnetic fields. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 13743–13754.
Park S.K. and Ducea M.N., 2003. Can in situ measurements of mantle electrical conductivity be used to infer properties of partial melts? J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2270, DOI: 10.1029/2002JB001899.
Patro P. K. and Egbert G.D., 2008. Regional conductivity structure of Cascadia: preliminary results from 3D inversion of USArray transportable array magnetotelluric data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20311, DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035326.
Pedersen L.B., 1988. Some aspects of magnetotelluric field procedures. Surv. Geophys., 9, 245–257.
Petiau G. and Dupis A., 1980. Noise, temperature coefficient, and long-time stability of electrodes for telluric observations. Geophys. Prospect., 28, 792–804.
Schultz A., Kurtz R.D., Chave A.D. and Jones A.G., 1993. Conductivity discontinuities in the upper mantle beneath a stable craton. Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2941–2944.
Sheriff R.E. and Geldart L.P., 1995. Exploration Seismology, 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Spitzer K., 2001. Magnetotelluric static shift and direct current sensitivity. Geophys. J. Int., 144, 289–299.
Sutarno D. and Vozoff K., 1989. Robust M-estimation of magnetotelluric impedance tensors. Explor. Geophys., 20, 383–398.
Torres-Verdin C. and Bostick F.X., 1992. Principles of spatial surface electric field filtering in magnetotellurics: Electromagnetic array profiling (EMAP). Geophysics, 57, 603–622.
Wannamaker P.E., Booker J.R., Jones A.G., Chave A.D., Filloux J.H., Waff H.S. and Law L.K., 1989. Resistivity cross-section through the de Fuca, Juan subduction system and its tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 14127–14145.
Wei W., Unsworth M., Jones A.G., Booker J.R., Tan H., Nelson D., Chen L., Li S., Solon K., Bedrosian P., Jin S., Deng M., Ledo J., Kay D. and Roberts B., 2001. Detection of widespread fluids in the Tibetan crust by magnetotelluric studies. Science, 292, 716–719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, L., Xu, Y. Multi-station superposition for magnetotelluric signal. Stud Geophys Geod 57, 276–291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-1129-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-1129-z