Abstract
The Role Prioritization Model (RPM; Haines & Stroessner, 2019) proposes that evaluations of gender-incongruent behavior depend on the degree to which actions imply prioritization of earning versus childrearing responsibilities. When behavior indicates prioritization of gender-atypical roles (a family focus for men and a professional focus for women), they will be judged as poor representatives of their gender and low on gender-stereotypical traits (i.e., men as competent and women as warm). Four experiments examined these hypotheses focusing on fathers’ perceived prioritization of family versus earning responsibilities. Study 1 verified that men and women are expected to prioritize breadwinning and caregiving roles, respectively, and that subtle context cues (i.e., whether men care for a child on a workday or weekend) affect the perceived prioritization of roles. Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that gender role incongruency (fathers caring for young children) produces a competence penalty when the context suggests prioritizing family over work (i.e., when men are described as caring for a child on a workday). In contrast, judgments of men are enhanced when the context suggests that expected prioritization is met (i.e., when men are described as caring for a child on the weekend). Study 4 showed that this penalty was attenuated by cues suggesting that men balance work and family responsibilities. These results are considered in terms of perceived role prioritization and consequences of gender incongruent behavior for men and women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data and materials that support the findings of this paper are available from the corresponding author (Neuenswander) upon reasonable request.
Code Availability
The code that supports the findings of this paper are available from the corresponding author (Neuenswander) upon reasonable request.
References
Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 469–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt005
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
Bauer, G. (2016). Gender roles, comparative advantages and the life course: The division of domestic labor in same-sex and different-sex couples. European Journal of Population, 32(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9363-z
Bear, J. B., & Glick, P. (2017). Breadwinner bonus and caregiver penalty in workplace rewards for men and women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616683016
Bhatia, N., & Bhatia, S. (2021). Changes in gender stereotypes over time: A computational analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320977178
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5
Block, K., Croft, A., de Souza, L., & Schmader, T. (2019). Do people care if men don’t care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.013
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. Money, work, sex. William Morrow.
Boehnke, M. (2011). Gender role attitudes around the globe: Egalitarian vs. traditional views. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X554438
Bott, A., Brockmann, L., Denneberg, I., Henken, E., Kuper, N., Kruse, F., & Degner, J. (2022). Spontaneous trait inferences from behavior: A systematic meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221100336
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. PNAS,117(49), 31063–69. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x
Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004002
Chesley, N. (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender and Society, 25(5), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211417433
Chesley, N., & Flood, S. (2017). Signs of change? At-home and breadwinner parents’ housework and child-care time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12376
Ciccia, R., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014). After the male breadwinner model? Childcare services and the division of labor in european countries. Social Politics, 21(1), 50–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu002
Coleman, J. M., & Franuik, R. (2011). Perceptions of mothers and fathers who take temporary work leave. Sex Roles, 64(5), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9918-8
Coltrane, S., Miller, E. C., DeHaan, T., & Stewart, L. (2013). Fathers and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12015
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Washington, G. (1975). When stereotypes Hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 11(6), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90003-7
Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673
Croft, A., Schmader, T., Block, K., & Baron, A. S. (2014). The second shift reflected in the second generation: Do parents’ gender roles at home predict children’s aspirations? Psychological Science, 25(7), 1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533968
Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314564789
Croft, A., Atkinson, C., Sandstrom, G., Orbell, S., & Aknin, L. (2021). Loosening the GRIP (gender roles inhibiting prosociality) to promote gender equality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320964615
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
Department of Labor, U. S. (2022). B. of L. S. Labor force participation of mothers and fathers little changed in 2021, remains lower than in 2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2022/labor-force-participation-of-mothers-and-fathers-little-changed-in-2021-remains-lower-than-in-2019.htm
Deutsch, F. M., & Saxon, S. E. (1998). The double standard of praise and criticism for mothers and fathers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00184.x
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001
Diekman, A., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.x
Diekman, A. B., & Hirnisey, L. (2007). The effect of context on the silver ceiling: A role congruity perspective on prejudiced responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303019
Donnelly, K., Twenge, J. M., Clark, M. A., Shaikh, S. K., Beiler-May, A., & Carter, N. T. (2016). Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315590774
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88
Eagly, A. (1987). Reporting sex differences. The American Psychologist, 42(7), 756–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.7.755
Eagly, A., & Diekman, A. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35).
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
Eagly, A. H., Steffen, V. J., Brumer, B., Rugs, D., Schafer, J., Bronner, E., & Winbury, G. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes, & H. M. Tratner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (issue 174 (pp. 123–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Farr, R. H., & Patterson, C. J. (2013). Coparenting among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples: Associations with adopted children’s outcomes. Child Development, 84(4), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12046
Feldman, R., Braun, K., & Champagne, F. A. (2019). The neural mechanisms and consequences of paternal caregiving. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0124-6
Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
Fiedler, K., Harris, C., & Schott, M. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests – an analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008
Fillo, J., Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Kohn, J. L. (2015). Dads doing diapers: Individual and relational outcomes associated with the division of childcare across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038572
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E. L., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00383.x
Gaunt, R. (2013). Breadwinning moms, caregiving dads: Double standards in social judgments of gender norm violators. Journal of Family Issues, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12438686
Gershuny, J., Bittman, M., & Brice, J. (2005). Exit, voice, and suffering: Do couples adapt to changing employment patterns? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00160.x
Gordon, A. R., & Meyer, I. H. (2008). Gender nonconformity as a target of prejudice, discrimination, and violence against LGB individuals. Journal of LGBT Health Research, 3(3), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15574090802093562
Haines, E. L., & Stroessner, S. J. (2019). The role prioritization model: How communal men and agentic women can (sometimes) have it all. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12), https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12504
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081
Hamilton, D. L., & Stroessner, S. J. (2021). Social cognition: Understanding people and events. Sage.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Heilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018). Gender discrimination in the workplace. In A. J. Colella, & E. B. King (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination (pp. 73–88). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199363643.013.7
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042501
Hollander, E. P. (2006). Influence processes in leadership-followership: Inclusion and the idiosyncrasy credit model. In D. A. Hantula (Ed.), Advances in social and organizational psychology: A tribute to Ralph Rosnow (pp. 293–312). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Jason Basa Nemec (2020, June 18). I love being a stay-at-home dad. And I still struggle with what it says about me as a man. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2020/06/18/i-love-being-stay-at-home-dad-i-still-struggle-with-what-it-says-about-me-man/
Kobrynowicz, D., & Biernat, M. (1997). Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(6), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1338
Levant, R. F., & Powell, W. A. (2017). The gender role strain paradigm. In R. F. Levant & Y. J. Wong (Eds.), The psychology of men and masculinities (pp. 15–43). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000023-002
Levy, G. D., Taylor, M. G., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). Traditional and evaluative aspects of flexibility in gender roles, social conventions, moral rules, and physical laws. Child Development, 66(2), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00887.x
Lewis, M., & Lupyan, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(10), 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6
Morgenroth, T., & Heilman, M. E. (2017). Should I stay or should I go? Implications of maternity leave choice for perceptions of working mothers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 53–56. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.008.
Park, B., & Banchefsky, S. (2019). Women and men, moms and dads: Leveraging social role change to promote gender equality. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 59, pp. 1–52). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.10.001
Park, B., Smith, J. A., & Correll, J. (2010). The persistence of implicit behavioral associations for moms and dads. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.009
Pew Research Center (2019, June 12). Fathers Day facts. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/).
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00135.x
Rochlen, A. B., McKelley, R. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2010). Stay-at-home fathers’ reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11(4), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017774
Rosenfeld, D. L., & Tomiyama, A. J. (2021). Can a pandemic make people more socially conservative? Political ideology, gender roles, and the case of COVID-19. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12745
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. In Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 61–79). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167–227). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00004-4
Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2013). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461160
Sanborn-Overby, U. A., & Powlishta, K. K. (2020). Differential reactions to male and female gender-role violations: Testing the sexual orientation hypothesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2531–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01803-x
Sanzari, C. M., Dennis, A., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2021). Should I stay or should I go?: Penalties for briefly de-prioritizing work or childcare. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12738
Sevilla, A., & Smith, S. (2020). Baby steps: The gender division of childcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa027
Silverstein, L. B., Auerbach, C. F., & Levant, R. F. (2002). Contemporary fathers reconstructing masculinity: Clinical implications of gender role strain. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(4), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.4.361
Skidmore, W. C., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., & Bailey, J. M. (2006). Gender nonconformity and psychological distress in lesbians and gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(6), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9108-5
Thébaud, S., & Halcomb, L. (2019). One step forward? Advances and setbacks on the path toward gender equality in families and work. Sociology Compass, 13(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12700
Thijs, P., te Grotenhuis, M., Scheepers, P., & van den Brink, M. (2019). The rise in support for gender egalitarianism in the Netherlands, 1979–2006: The roles of educational expansion, secularization, and female labor force participation. Sex Roles, 81(9), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1015-z
Uleman, J. S., & Saribay, S. A. (2018). Initial impressions of others. In Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 337–366). Oxford University Press.
Williams Institute (2018). How many same-sex couples in the US are raising children?https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/same-sex-parents-us/
Yildirim, T. M., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2021). The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown. Gender Work and Organization, 28(S1), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529
Zhu, N., & Chang, L. (2019). Evolved but not fixed: A life history account of gender roles and gender inequality. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01709
Zuo, J. (2004). Shifting the breadwinning boundary: The role of men’s breadwinner status and their gender ideologies. Journal of Family Issues, 25(6), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03259144
Funding
Studies 2–4 were funded by Assigned Release Time (ART grant), College of Arts and Science, William Paterson University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Haines, Stroessner; data collection: Haines; analysis and interpretation of results: Neuenswander, Stroessner, Haines; draft manuscript preparation: Neuenswander, Stroessner. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethics Approval
This research complies with current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, and it was approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Review Board (IRB) the William Paterson University IRB.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Neuenswander, K.L., Haines, E.L. & Stroessner, S.J. Caring or Competent? Apparent Prioritization of Childcare Over Work Affects Evaluations and Stereotyping of Fathers. Sex Roles 89, 328–346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01401-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01401-w