Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Schemas, Gender Roles, and Expressive Writing: Toward a Process-focused Model

  • Feminist Forum
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Range and Jenkins (2010) timely and compelling review of Pennebaker’s (1989, 1993) Expressive Writing Paradigm (EWP) provides a valuable framework for conceptualizing the role of gender-related variables in EWP studies, and for examining these variables in the context of gender schema theory, social role theory, and gender socialization theory. This comment contributes to Range and Jenkins efforts by integrating their analysis with: 1) findings regarding multimodal assessment of individual differences and outcomes; and 2) process-focused studies of participants’ responses to different psychological assessment tools. When multimodal assessment procedures are coupled with experimental manipulations that differentially impact different measures, researchers’ understanding of the benefits of trauma writing will increase and the efficacy of disclosure interventions in applied settings will be enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. P., & Krishnamurthy, R. (1993). Combining the Rorschach and MMPI in the assessment of adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 132–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, S., Follette, V., Hall, M., & Palm, K. (2002). Physical and psychological effects of written disclosure among sexual abuse survivors. Behavior Therapy, 33, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgeny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, L. (1938). A visual-motor gestalt test and its clinical use. American Orthopsychiatric Association Research Monographs, No. 3, pp. 3–176.

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1995). Sex differences in objective and projective dependency tests: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 2, 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (2002). A process dissociation approach to objective-projective test score interrelationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 47–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (2005). The dependent patient: A practitioner’s guide. Washington: APA Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (2007). Toward a process-based framework for classifying personality tests: Comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006). Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 202–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (2009). Heisenberg, Kandinsky, and the heteromethod convergence problem: Lessons from within and beyond psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., Rossner, S. C., Hill, E. L., & Stepanian, M. L. (1994). Face validity and fakability of objective and projective measures of dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., Bowers, K. S., & Bonner, S. (1996a). Effects of induced mood states on objective and projective dependency scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 324–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., Bowers, K. S., & Bonner, S. (1996b). Relationships of objective and projective dependency scores to sex role orientation in college student subjects. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 555–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, S. M. (1996). The social psychology of gender. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, S. (1991). The concept of dependence as developed by Birtchnell: A critical evaluation. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 64, 237–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, P., & Blatt, S. J. (1990). Use of the TAT to measure change in defense mechanisms following intensive psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 236–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdelyi, M. H. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Freud’s cognitive psychology. NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1992). Putting stress into words: The impact of writing on physiological, absentee, and self-reported emotional well-being measures. American Journal of Health Promotion, 6, 280–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 823–865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A. (1987). Male and female emotional dependency and its implications for the therapist-client relationship. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 18, 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. A. (1993). Dependency and Japanese socialization. NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotions, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2001). Toward more clinically relevant assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 307–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J. (1996). The Rorschach and MMPI: Toward a more scientific understanding of cross-modal assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 558–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 22 (pp. 211–244). NY: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 539–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Range, L. M., & Jenkins, S. R. (2010). Who benefits from Pennebaker’s expressive writing paradigm? Research recommendations from three gender theories. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Range, L. M., Kovac, S. H., & Marion, M. (2000). Does writing about the bereavement lessen grief following sudden, unintentionl death? Death Studies, 24, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, B. C., & McNally, R. J. (1995). Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, T. (2001). Autonomy and relatedness in psychopathology and treatment: A cross-cultural formulation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 127, 89–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S. (2004). Further clarifications of the concept of amae in relation to dependence and attachment. Human Development, 47, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert F. Bornstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bornstein, R.F. Gender Schemas, Gender Roles, and Expressive Writing: Toward a Process-focused Model. Sex Roles 63, 173–177 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9752-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9752-z

Keywords

Navigation