Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scolding “Brothers” and Caring “Friends”: Discursive Construction of the Identity of Mediation Helpers in China

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of the call for specialized and professionalized mediators worldwide, the importance of mediation helpers who are non-mediators but invited to assist the mediation in China can never be underestimated. Different from the western style of co-mediation that involves two or more mediators, China has the tradition to invite mediation helpers such as family members, neighbors, friends and working unit leaders, to help the mediator settle disputes for parties. Nowadays, in one innovative form of people’s mediation, TV mediation, warm-hearted people who are unfamiliar with the parties are also invited to be mediation helpers. This paper, based on the socio-cultural linguistic framework of identity proposed by Bucholtz and Hall (Discourse Stud 7(4–5):585–614, 2005), intends to analyze how “stranger” mediation helpers discursively construct their identities as scolding “brothers” and caring “friends” in China’s TV mediation. The data used in this paper consists of transcripts of 10 episodes of TV mediation programs on divorce disputes in China. Data analysis shows that unlike the mediator who is supposed to be neutral, mediation helpers often align/disalign themselves with parties, discursively construct such an identity as scolding “elder brothers” and caring “friends”, and achieve additional favorable effects that would otherwise be normally impossible by the neutral mediator. This paper concludes that due to the socio-cultural traditions in China, this seemingly peculiar phenomenon to the west is actually an innovation of mediation and is the very secret that makes mediation in China vigorous and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://jptj.jxntv.cn/signup.shtml. Accessed December 15, 2016.

  2. http://www.soku.com/search_video/q_%E9%87%91%E7%89%8C%E8%B0%83%E8%A7%A3+2015?spm=a2h0k.8191407.0.0. Accessed January 24, 2016.

  3. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/139725?rskey=wN4Xbs&result=1. Accessed February 4, 2017.

  4. http://www.cssn.cn/dybg/gqdy_sh/201510/t20151019_2500238_3.shtml. Accessed May 5, 2017.

References

  1. Bahm, Archie J. 1992. The heart of confucius: interpretations of “genuine living” and “great wisdom”. Fremont, CA: Jain Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boulle, Laurence, and Miryana Nesic. 2001. Mediation: Principles, process, practice. Chatswood: LexisNexis Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boulle, Laurence, Michael T. Colatrella, and Anthony Picchioni. 2008. Mediation: Skills and techniques. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2008. Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua 27(1/2): 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng, Yiheng, Xu Kaibin, Fu Xiaoqiu, and Sang Ma. 2013. Mediating conflict on TV: Discourse analysis of gold medal mediation. China Media Research 9(4): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bois, Du, and W. John. 1991. Transcription design principles for spoken language research. Pragmatics 1(1): 71–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1969. Sociolinguistics. In Advances in experimental psychology, vol. 4, ed. L. Berkowitz, 91–165. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fei, Xiaotong. 1992. From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (trans: Wang, Zheng, and Hamilton, G.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  10. Feng, Bo. 2011. Tiaojielei jiemu shoushi zhidao jiexi (analysis on rating trends for mediation programs). Rating China (7).

  11. Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hawes, Colin S., and Shuyu Kong. 2013. Primetime dispute resolution: Reality TV mediation shows in China’s “harmonious society”. Law & Society Review 47(4): 739–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedeen, Timothy. 2005. Coercion and self-determination in court-connected mediation: All mediations are voluntary, but some are more voluntary than others. Justice System Journal 26(3): 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, Philip C.C. 2005. Divorce law practices and the origins, myths, and realities of judicial mediation in China. Modern China 31(2): 151–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Chengtuan, and Yongping Ran. 2016. Self-professional identity construction through other-identity deconstruction in Chinese televised debating discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 94: 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Jianguo. 2011. Jinpai tiaojie: tiaojie tongzhihua de shichang—Fang Jiangxi dianshitai fu taizhang, Jiangxi dianshitai weixing pindao zongjian Li Jianguo (Gold Medal Mediation: Mediating the Homogeneous Market—Interviewing Li Jianguo, Deputy Director of Jiangxi TV Station and Director of Satellite TV Channel of Jiangxi TV Station). China Advertising 5: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Shaojie. 2006. Shuren shehui cunzai de helixing (on the reasonableness of the existence of the familiar society). People’s Tribune 10: 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Locher, MiriamA. 2008. Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In Handbook of interpersonal communication, ed. Gerd Antos and Eija Ventola, 509–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, James Robert, and Peter R.R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Matz, David. 1994. Mediator pressure and party autonomy: Are they consistent with each other? Negotiation Journal 10(4): 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGuire, William J. 1961. The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry 24: 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nee, Victor. 1994. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society (Xiangtu Zhongguo) (book review). Contemporary Sociology 23(5): 764–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan, Qingyun. 2013. Dangxia dianshi tiaojie jiemu zhong de falv quehan (legal defects in current TV mediation programs). Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law (The Rule of Law Forum) 28(3): 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sha, Ying. 2003. Shishu rujia falv sixiang zhong de Li (a study on Li in the legal thoughts of confucianism). Journal of South-central University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science) 2: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Houwen, Fleur. 2015. If it doesn’t make sense, it’s not true: How Judge Judy creates coherent stories through common-sense reasoning according to the neoliberal agenda. Social Semiotics 25(3): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and discourse: How social context influence text and talk. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Wall Jr., James A., Dong-Won Sohn, Natalie Cleeton, and Deng Jian Jin. 1995. Community and family mediation in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Conflict Management 6(1): 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wall Jr., James A., and Michael E. Blum. 1991. Community mediation in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, Youping. 2016. Burying attitudes in words: Linguistic realization of the shift of judges’ court conciliation style. Semiotica 209: 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, Mayfair. 1989. The gift economy and state power in China. Comparative Studies in Society and History 31(1): 40–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Yuhong. 2013. Chaxugeju sixiang de xiandai quanshi (modern interpretation to the differential mode of association). Academics 2: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, Jinfan. 1997. Zhongguo falv de chuantong yu jindai zhuanxing (traditions of Chinese law and its modern transformation). Beijing: Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, Yafei, and Li Chen. 2017. Exploration of factors leading to successful mediation: A regression analysis of reality TV mediation show episodes in China. International Journal of Conflict Management 28(1): 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of the philosophy and social science research programs in Guangdong Province (GD14YWW03, 2016WTSCX029). I’m deeply indebted to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. My sincere thanks also go to co-editors of this issue, Prof. Anne Wagner and Prof. Aleksandra Matulewska, for their valuable advice and kind support in the writing of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

    Youping Xu

Authors
  1. Youping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youping Xu.

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

Mediation helper

MH

The male party

MP

The female party

FP

Speaker identity/turn start

:

Speech overlap

[]

Final

.

Continuing

,

Appeal

?

Long pause

… (N)

Researcher’s comment

()

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y. Scolding “Brothers” and Caring “Friends”: Discursive Construction of the Identity of Mediation Helpers in China. Int J Semiot Law 32, 135–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9574-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9574-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation