Skip to main content
Log in

The dual dimension of scientific research experience acquisition and its development: a 40-year analysis of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Journals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific experience is crucial for producing high-quality research, and the approach of acquisition can significantly impact its accumulation rate. We present a framework for scientific experience acquisition that outlines the dual dimensions of experience accumulation: self-accumulation and accumulation under senior expert guidance. To validate the framework, we conducted a case study using 2,957,700 papers from all 568 Chinese humanities and social science journals, taking into account the limitations of the international journal system. Our findings reveal that self-accumulation has been gradually declining, decreasing from 57.67% in 1980 to 4.55% in 2020. Conversely, accumulation under senior expert guidance has been steadily increasing, rising from 5.7% in 1980 to 28.69% in 2020. Furthermore, the proportion of the two approaches varies by discipline. Social sciences such as Psychology, Economics, and Management, which rely more on large teams and collaborative research, have a higher proportion of accumulation under senior expert guidance than humanities disciplines like Art, History, and Philosophy, which depend more on individual research. Finally, this research also offers a distinctive exploration of the question posed by the US National Science and Technology Council (2008): how and why do communities of innovation form and evolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term “senior expert” in this context refers to individuals who can share their experiences with newcomers entering academia, not just a student's supervisor.

  2. The Chinese version of Social Science Citation Index.

  3. The data is sourced from the National Name Report, published by China's Ministry of Public Security. This report includes a count of common surnames and the most frequently used first names across different generations. By combining common surnames with the most popular first names, a list of common names is generated.

References

  • Adams, J. (2012). The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amjad, T., Ding, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, C., Daud, A., Tang, J., & Song, M. (2017). Standing on the shoulders of giants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, C., Li, N., Li, X., & Liu, L. (2013). Reforming China’s S&T system. Science, 341(6145), 460–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1), e1400005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daud, A., Abbasi, R., & Muhammad, F. (2013). Finding rising stars in social networks. In W. Meng, L. Feng, S. Bressan, W. Winiwarter, & W. Song (Eds.), Database systems for advanced applications: 18th international conference, DASFAA 2013. Proceedings, part I 18 (pp. 13–24). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daud, A., Ahmad, M., Malik, M. S. I., & Che, D. (2015). Using machine learning techniques for rising star prediction in co-author network. Scientometrics, 102, 1687–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golestan, S., Ramezani, M., Guerrero, J. M., Freijedo, F. D., & Monfared, M. (2014). Moving average filter based phase-locked loops: Performance analysis and design guidelines. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 29(6), 2750–2763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (2008). The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., & Liermann, M. (1998). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Learning from experience in fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 8, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2018). Reciprocity and success in academic careers. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03781

  • Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019). Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liénard, J. F., Achakulvisut, T., Acuna, D. E., & David, S. V. (2018). Intellectual synthesis in mentorship determines success in academic careers. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmgren, R. D., Ottino, J. M., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2010). The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature, 465(7298), 622–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science and Technology Council. (2008). The science of science policy: A federal research roadmap. National Science and Technology Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oromaner, M. (1977). Professional age and the reception of sociological publications: A test of the Zuckerman-Merton hypothesis. Social Studies of Science, 7(3), 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. M., Jung, W. S., Yang, J. S., & Stanley, H. E. (2011). Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(1), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. M., Riccaboni, M., Stanley, H. E., & Pammolli, F. (2012). Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(14), 5213–5218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, M., Fischer, M. R., & Bauer, D. (2016). Publication activities of German junior researchers in academic medicine: Which factors impact impact factors? BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, M., Zeng, A., Li, M., Fan, Y., & Di, Z. (2017). Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers. Scientometrics, 111, 1839–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, P., Reviriego, P., Maestro, J. A., & Ruano, O. (2007). New protection techniques against SEUs for moving average filters in a radiation environment. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 54(4), 957–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekara, V., Deville, P., Ahnert, S. E., Barabási, A. L., Sinatra, R., & Lehmann, S. (2018). The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(50), 12603–12607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. R., Meena, Y. K., & Singh, G. (2022). Forecasting on Covid-19 infection waves using a rough set filter driven moving average models. Applied Soft Computing, 131, 109750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strumpfer, D. J. W. (2005). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Notes on early positive psychology (Psychofortology). South African Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2021). Planning for science: China’s “grand experiment” and global implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taheri, B., & Sedighizadeh, M. (2021). A moving window average method for internal fault detection of power transformers. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4, 100195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2014). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder (Vol. 3). Random House Trade Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvik, V. I., & Smalheiser, N. R. (2009). Author name disambiguation in MEDLINE. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 3(3), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torvik, V. I., Weeber, M., Swanson, D. R., & Smalheiser, N. R. (2005). A probabilistic similarity metric for Medline records: A model for author name disambiguation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubfal, D., & Maffioli, A. (2011). The impact of funding on research collaboration: Evidence from a developing country. Research Policy, 40(9), 1269–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Zhang, T. (2019). Co-authorship analyses of management journals: Contrast with science and humanities disciplines. Journal of Documentation and Data, 1(3), 81–95. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. (2019). Early-career setback and future career impact. Nature Communications, 10(1), 4331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. (2019). Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(22), 10729–10733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., & Al Hasan, M. (2017, November). Name disambiguation in anonymized graphs using network embedding. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 1239–1248).

  • Zuckerman, H. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grant No. 2023D01C28), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72071196), the Ph.D. Scientific research Start-up Project of Xinjiang University (Grant No. BS202104), the Tianchi Doctoral Project of Xinjiang (Grant No. TCBS202050) and the Xinjiang High-level Talents Tianchi Program (Grant No. TCBR202104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-liang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Informed consent

1) This article has not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; 2) the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication in another journal; 3) all authors have been personally and actively involved in substantive work leading to the manuscript, and will hold themselves jointly and individually responsible for its content.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not include any research involving humans or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 8.

Table 8 List of top journals in China humanities and social sciences system

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, K., Gao, Xx., Huang, Yd. et al. The dual dimension of scientific research experience acquisition and its development: a 40-year analysis of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Journals. Scientometrics 129, 2827–2853 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05002-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05002-6

Keywords

Navigation