Skip to main content
Log in

How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the impact of Covid-19 on scientists' collaboration behaviour in the 14 countries with the largest research output. The approach is bibliometric, taking the unit of analysis of collaborations as the individual researchers and the co-authorships in their preprints. The time plot of the data confirms a clear discontinuity in the number of preprint depositions after the Covid-19 outbreak. Less evident is the discontinuity in average number of co-authors per preprint, and also in propensity to collaborate. Investigating further, a multivariate econometric analysis shows that for propensity to national collaboration (both intra- and extramural) there has been a positive “effect” from the pandemic, but negative one on international collaboration. The same analysis conducted by country, however, reveals that these effects are significant only in some countries and often with discordant signs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020, last accessed 10 June 2022.

  2. Namely, Animal Behavior and Cognition; Biochemistry; Bioengineering; Bioinformatics; Biophysics; Cancer Biology; Cell Biology; Clinical Trials; Developmental Biology; Ecology; Epidemiology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics; Genomics; Immunology; Microbiology; Molecular Biology; Neuroscience; Paleontology; Pathology; Pharmacology and Toxicology; Physiology; Plant Biology; Scientific Communication and Education; Synthetic Biology; Systems Biology; Zoology.

  3. For a brief review of literature on the use of bioRxiv and preprint repositories in general as data sources, see Abramo, D’Angelo and Mele (2022).

  4. https://www.bioRxiv.org/about-bioRxiv

  5. Authors may deposit revised versions of articles up to their formal acceptance by a journal.

  6. Namely, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States.

  7. Note that, co-authorship by e.g. Italian and French researchers are considered as international collaborations, even though they are both part of the EC.

  8. Data on the research staff of bio-related departments at universities in the 14 surveyed countries are not available. However they can be proxied through output data. Specifically, we used the number of preprints deposited by each university as a proxy of the size of its bio-related research staff.

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Mele, I. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04245-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography, 3(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, S., Mugnaini, R., Baltà, J., & Abadal, E. (2020). Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society? Scientometrics, 124(3), 2661–2685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine: The Official Publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 60(5), 768–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., Fry, C. V., & Wagner, C. S. (2021). International collaboration during the Covid-19 crisis: Autumn 2020 developments. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3683–3692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, E. (2017). bioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg initiative. Nature, 545(7652), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, E. (2020). Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? Nature, 582(7811), 167–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colavizza, G. (2021). Meta-research on Covid-19: An overview of the early trends. http://arXiv.org/2106.02961

  • Cunningham, E., Smyth, B., & Greene, D. (2021). Collaboration in the time of COVID: A scientometric analysis of multidisciplinary SARS-CoV-2 research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00922-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleidi, M., De Lipsis, V., Mazzucato, M., Ryan-Collins, J., & Agnolucci, P. (2019). The macroeconomic impact of government innovation policies: A quantitative assessment. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Policy Report working paper series (IIPP WP 2019–06). Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2019-06

  • Duan, D., & Xia, Q. (2021). Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 429–441.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, C. V., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., & Wagner, C. S. (2020). Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early Covid-19 research. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0236307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L., Geng, X. S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A., Salholz-Hillel, M., Boyack, K. W., & Baas, J. (2021). The rapid, massive growth of Covid-19 authors in the scientific literature. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel, J. O., & Stegle, O. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on life scientists. Genome Biology, 21(113), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27, 901–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., & Haupt, J. P. (2021). Scientific globalism during a global crisis: Research collaboration and open access publications on Covid-19. Higher Education, 81(5), 949–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Sun, K., Zhu, Y., Song, J., Yang, J., Qian, L., & Wang, S. (2021). Analyzing the research evolution in response to Covid-19. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzon-Garcia, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish University researchers in Geology. Scientometrics, 55(3), 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S. M., Mueller, G. F., Navarini, A. A., & Brandt, O. (2020). National publication productivity during the Covid-19 pandemic—A preliminary exploratory analysis of the 30 countries most affected. Biology, 9(9), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pai, M. (2020). Covidization of research: What are the risks? Nature Medicine, 26(8), 1159–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, J. K. (2021). Visualizing the knowledge outburst in global research on Covid-19. Scientometrics, 126(5), 4173–4193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Melin, G., Danell, R., & Kaloudis, A. (1997). Research collaboration at Nordic universities. Scientometrics, 39(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redden, E. (2020). Empty benches at empty lab tables. Inside Higher Ed, Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/03/30/nonessential-research-has-halted-many-campuses

  • Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, P. D., & Zimmerman, S. (2021). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on scientific publishing. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(3), 484–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Franchi, T., Kerwan, A., Griffin, M., Del Jennick Soleil, C., Mundo, S. A., Ali, M. A., & Agha, R. (2021). Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on scientific research and implications for clinical academic training—A review. International Journal of Surgery, 86, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thavorn, J., Gowanit, C., Muangsin, V., & Muangsin, N. (2021). Collaboration network and trends of global coronavirus disease research: A scientometric analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 45001–45016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos, G. L., Cordeiro, L. P., Duarte-Filho, G. C., & Brum, A. A. (2021). Modelling the epidemic growth of preprints on Covid-19 and SARS-CoV-2. Frontiers in Physics, 9, 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent-Lamarre, P., Sugimoto, C.R., & Larivière V. (2020). The decline of women’s research production during the coronavirus pandemic. Nature Index. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/decline-women-scientist-research-publishing-production-coronavirus-pandemic

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Abramo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. & Di Costa, F. How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour. Scientometrics 127, 5053–5071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04450-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04450-2

Keywords

Navigation