Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping computer science research in Africa: using academic networking sites for assessing research activity

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the research conducted in Africa that can address social and economic challenges on the continent remains invisible when using standard bibliometric databases because these fail to capture research outputs that are in local languages or published in local journals. We turn to academic networking sites as data sources to uncover research outputs of sub-Saharan African countries to provide a fuller picture of the research activity in the region. We map computer science research productivity and collaboration in sub-Saharan Africa using traditional bibliometric databases (Scopus and Web of Science) and an alternative data source: Academia.edu. This alternative data source reveals additional research to that found in the bibliometric databases and provides insights into publication and collaboration patterns. We found 761 unique records not indexed in the bibliometric databases, constituting 6% of all the computer science research output for the region. These records were mostly articles in local and regional journals. We also found a higher percentage of regional collaborations. The top five countries for computer science research outputs in sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South Africa) using both traditional bibliometric and alternative data sources were Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Ghana, and Mauritius. We conclude that utilizing only traditional bibliometric databases for mapping computer science research activity in sub-Saharan Africa provides an incomplete picture of the research happening in this region. Using academic networking sites as data sources, despite being labor intensive and having other limitations, can help to fill in some of the gaps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulhayoglu, M. A., & Thijs, B. (2018). Use of locality sensitive hashing (LSH) algorithm to match Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 116(2), 1229–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams, L., Burke, M., Gray, E., & Rens, A. (2008). Opening Access to Knowledge in Southern African Universities. SARUA Study Series, Johannesburg: Southern African Regional Universities Association. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from http://www.sarua.org/files/publications/OpeningAccess/Opening_Access_Knowledge_2008.pdf.

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K., Hook, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(1), 547–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo, O. (2013). Science research and publication in Africa: The Nigeria Perspective. The African Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(1), 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aravanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2000). Science in Africa: A scientometric panorama using PASCAL database. Scientometrics, 47(3), 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, E., Vignola-gagne, E., Cote, G., Lariviere, E., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asubiaro, T. (2019). How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics, 120, 1261–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asubiaro, T., & Badmus, O. M. (2020). Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620907958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakri, A., & Willett, P. (2011). Computer science research in Malaysia: A bibliometric analysis. Aslib Proceedings, 63(2/3), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, C., Mouton, J., & Prozesky, H. (Eds.). (2018). The Next Generation of Scientists in Africa. Cape Town: African Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81(2), 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff, N. (2010). South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics, 84(2), 416–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. (2008). ICT assessment: Moving beyond journal outputs. Scientometrics, 74(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confraria, H., Blanckenberg, J., & Swart C. (2020). Which factors influence international research collaboration in Africa? In Ramutsindela M., & Mickler D. (Eds.) Africa and the Sustainable development goals. Sustainable development goals series (pp. 243–255). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

  • Confraria, H., & Godinho, M. M. (2015). The impact of African science: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1241–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B.E., & Pooley, J.D. (2017). “Facebook for Academics”: The convergence of self-branding and social media logic on Academia.edu. Social Media + Society, January–March, 1–11.

  • Eduan, W., & Yuanqun, J. (2019). Patterns of the China–Africa research collaborations from 2006 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis. Higher Education, 77(6), 979–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M. (2010). The role of conference publications in CS. Communications of the ACM, 53(2), 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., & Cunningham, P. (2010). Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A., & Von Ins, M. (2008). Comparisons of results of publication counting using different methods. Scientometrics, 77(1), 147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, A., McCain, K., Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2001). Scholarly publication in the internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing and Management, 57(2), 661–675.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harsh, M., & Zachary, G. P. (2013). Computer science research capacity as a driver of ICTD innovation: institutional factors in Kenya and Uganda. Internet and Communication Technology for Development 2013 Proceedings, ACM 978-1-4503-1907-2/13/12.

  • Harsh, M., Bal, R., Wetmore, J., Zachary, G. P., & Holden, K. (2018). The rise of computing research in East Africa: The relationship between funding, capacity and research community in a nascent field. Minerva, 56(1), 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsh, M., Holden, K., Wetmore, J., Zachary, G. P., & Bal, R. (2019). Situating science in Africa: The dynamics of computing research in Nairobi and Kampala. Social Studies of Science, 49(1), 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 5(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2019). Author-based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776–1784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics, 101(1), 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megnigbeto, E. (2013a). International collaboration in scientific publishing: the case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96(3), 761–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megnigbeto, E. (2013b). Scientific publishing in West Africa: Comparing Benin with Ghana and Senegal. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1113–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini, R. (2012). Emerging journals. EMBO Reports, 13, 106–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Choppy, C., van Leeuwen, J., & Staunstrup, J. (2009). Research evaluation for computer science. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molla, T., & Cuthbert, D. (2016). In pursuit of the African PhD: A critical survey of emergent policy issues in select Sub-Saharan African nations, Ethiopia, Ghana and South Africa. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 635–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEPAD (2014). African Innovation Outlook II. Pretoria: NPCA. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from https://www.nepad.org/publication/african-innovation-outlook-ii.

  • Neylon, C., Willmers, M., & King, T. (2014). Illustrating impact: Applying altmetrics to Southern African research. Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme (SCAP) Brief No. 1 for the International Development Research Centre, January 2014, University of Cape Town. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11427/2316/SCAP_Neylon_IllustratingImpact_2014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  • Onyancha, O. B. (2015). Social media and research: an assessment of the coverage of South African universities in ResearchGate, Web of Science and the Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 81(1), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87(2), 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Nimo, F., & Boshoff, N. (2017). Research collaboration in Ghana: Patterns, motives and roles. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1099–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2010). A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: Science in the tip of Africa. Scientometrics, 85(1), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2169–2185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Swanepoel, M. (2018). Canadian and South African scholars’ use of institutional repositories, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. K., Uddin, A., & Pinto, D. (2015). Computer science research: The top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics, 104(2), 529–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometrics studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2014). Academia.edu: Social network or academic network? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 721–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W., Mouton, J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Boshoff, N. (2006). How relevant are local scholarly journals in global science? A case study of South Africa. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovations systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88(2), 471–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, A., Singh, V. K., Pinto, D., & Olmos, I. (2015). Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 105(1), 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uthman, O. A. (2010). Patterns and determinants of HIV research productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: Bibliometric analysis of 1981 to 2009 PubMed papers. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10(1), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2004). Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. In H. F. Moed (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 373–388). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent technocultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., Eckmann, M., Goldenstein, S., & Rocha, A. (2013). How productivity and impact differ across computer science subareas. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 67. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492007.2492026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., & Valle, E. (2013). What happens to computer science research after it is published? Tracking CS research lines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6), 1104–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., Xavier, E. C., & Bezerra, F. (2009). Scientific production in Computer Science: A comparative study of Brazil and other countries. Scientometrics, 81(2), 535–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). A decade of development in sub-Saharan Africa science, technology, engineering and mathematics research. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/237371468204551128/A-decade-of-development-in-sub-Saharan-African-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-research.

  • Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Research universities on the ResearchGate networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdravkovic, M., Chiwona-Karltun, L., & Zink, E. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of South-South and North-South scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities. Scientometrics, 108(2), 717–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr. Eric Monson with the Duke University Libraries’ Center for Data and Visualization Sciences for his help and guidance with data cleaning, organization, and visualization. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments and feedback which helped improve the paper significantly.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interdisciplinary Studies in Liberal Arts, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA

    Matthew Harsh

  2. Duke Center for International Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Ravtosh Bal

  3. Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Alex Weryha

  4. Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Justin Whatley

  5. School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Charles C. Onu

  6. GE Renewable Energies, Hydro Division, Sorel-Tracy, QC, Canada

    Lisa M. Negro

Authors
  1. Matthew Harsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravtosh Bal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alex Weryha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Justin Whatley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles C. Onu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisa M. Negro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Harsh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 8.

Table 8 African journals in Academia.edu
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harsh, M., Bal, R., Weryha, A. et al. Mapping computer science research in Africa: using academic networking sites for assessing research activity. Scientometrics 126, 305–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation