Abstract
Understanding the flow characteristics of talents is a task of great significance for talents cultivating, talent structure optimizing, talent policy making, etc. In this paper, we investigate the flow of leading research talents in China based on the academic career data of Distinguished Young Scholars sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We explore the flow characteristics from perspectives of time, region, and institution type. We find (1) over 40% of the Distinguished Young Scholars have flow experiences and (a) the flow rate reaches the highest in 5–10 years of the scholars’ academic career or in 1–5 years before receiving the Distinguished Young Scholars Fund, (b) as the working year grows, scholars are more inclined to take on part-time responsibilities (as, e.g., visiting professors); (2) the flow of Distinguished Young Scholars mainly occurs in the provinces with the most sufficient science and education resources, while the inflow and outflow provinces are becoming more balanced in the recent years; (3) the flow of talents within colleges and universities is more frequent than research institutes, while research institutes are facing a severe problem of brain drain. We designed questionnaires for the Distinguished Young Scholars in hope of finding potential causes of their flows. We find that (4) the most influential factors (to talent flow) are personal research ability improvement, career development and work environment, followed by the (inflow) institution’s reputation, compensation and benefits, and the (inflow) province’s Science and Technology Policies environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Hence no approximation is given for trend analysis.
During the statistics, we test many values for the parameter (including 0 that means part time jobs are ignored), and the conclusion in this section is basically unchanged.
References
Alexander, M. P. (2018). Multiscale impact of researcher mobility. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0580.
Borjas, G. J., Doran, K. B., & Shen, Y. (2018). Ethnic complementarities after the opening of China how chinese graduate students affected the productivity of their advisors. Journal of Human Resources, 53(1), 1–31.
Cañibano, C., Fox, M. F., & Otamendi, F. J. (2015). Gender and patterns of temporary mobility among researchers. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 320–331.
Czaika, M., & Orazbayev, S. (2018). The globalisation of scientific mobility, 1970–2014. Applied Geography, 96, 1–10.
Dai, Y., Kong, D., & Liu, S. (2018). Returnee talent and corporate investment: Evidence from China. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 313–337.
Huang, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2017). The Mobility of Researchers between China and the US. In IEEE 2017 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (pp. 1–4).
Lu, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). The reversed brain drain: A mixed-method study of the reversed migration of Chinese overseas scientists. Science Technology & Society, 20(3), 279–299.
Ma, T. C., Li, R. N., Ou, G. Y., Wu, X., & Yue, M. L. (2019). An exploration on the flow of leading research talents in China: From the perspective of distinguished young scholars. In Proceedings of ISSI 2019—The 17th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 363–374). Italy: Rome.
Sugimoto, C. R., Robinson-García, N., Murray, D. S., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature News, 550(7674), 29.
Wei, F., Feng, N., & Zhang, K. H. (2017). Innovation capability and innovation talents: Evidence from China based on a quantile regression approach. Sustainability, 9(7), 1218.
Zha, Q. (2016). What factors influence the direction of global brain circulation: The case of Chinese Canada Research Chairholders. Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 214–234.
Zhou, Y., Guo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). High-level talent flow and its influence on regional unbalanced development in China. Applied Geography, 91, 89–98.
Acknowledgements
We’d like to show our appreciation to the anonymous DY Scholars for their kind help on filling the questionnaires. Their answers help us a lot on analyzing the reasons behind the talent flows. We also want to show appreciation to the review experts for their precious comments on the manuscript in ISSI 2019 conference. All the comments have been carefully handled. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. 71603252); Document Information Capacity Building Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. E0290001); Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 2019176); Youth Innovation Team Project of National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Teaching Research Project of School of Medicine, Wuhan University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendix
Appendix
Results of factors that influence flowing returned by 73 DY Scholars in various time intervals (0-5 years to more than 20 years since work) are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yue, Ml., Li, Rn., Ou, Gy. et al. An exploration on the flow of leading research talents in China: from the perspective of distinguished young scholars. Scientometrics 125, 1559–1574 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03562-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03562-x