Scientometrics

, Volume 112, Issue 2, pp 1007–1023 | Cite as

Characteristics of papers published in journals: an analysis of open access journals, country of publication, and languages used

Article

Abstract

This study explores how the citation of open access (OA) journal articles occurs by analyzing the impact of certain journal characteristics, namely, whether the journal is OA and whether its country of publication is the same as the affiliation of a paper’s author. As the language of a paper is an important factor contributing to paper citations, this study uses papers in English. This analysis included publications from 77 countries from 2010 to 2012. This analysis included 19,530 journals and 3,215,742 papers without duplication. The results showed that papers published in OA and international journals were cited in more countries than non-OA and domestic journals, and a higher percentage of these were being cited by foreign countries. From these findings, it was determined that the more widely accessible OA journals were effectively being accessed by researchers from multiple countries. However, of the top 10% most cited papers in international journals, a higher percentage of these came from non-OA compared to OA journals. Among domestic journals, no such difference was found. Papers published in non-OA international journals were most cited in foreign countries with a large number of published papers. Hence, the effect of OA’s expanded accessibility, while having an apparent effect on heightening the interest of foreign readership, has a limited impact in terms of increasing citations.

Keywords

Journal Open access Country of publication Languages used 

References

  1. Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed March 27, 2017.
  4. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2012). Ten years on from the Budapest open access initiative: Setting the default to open. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations. Accessed March 27, 2017.
  5. Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trail. BMJ, 377, 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gamba, E., Packer, A., & Meneghini, R. (2015). Pathways to internationalize Brazilian journals of psychology. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 28(1), 66–71.Google Scholar
  8. James, E., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meneghini, R. (1992). Brazilian production in biochemistry international versus domestic publication. Scientometrics, 23(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. (2007). Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO Reports, 8(2), 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meneghini, R., Mugnaini, R., & Packer, A. (2006). International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI database. Scientometrics, 69(3), 529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OECD. (2015). Making open science a reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25. Paris: OECD. https://www.fct.pt/dsi/docs/Making_Open_Science_a_Reality.pdf.
  15. Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Solomon, D., Laakso, M., & Bjōrk, B.-C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, L., Liu, X., & Fang, H. (2015a). Investigation of the degree to which articles supported by research grants are published in open access health and life sciences journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015b). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xia, J., Myer, T. L., & Wilhoit, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Science and Technology PolicyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations