Barnes, S., & Lewin, C. (2005). An introduction to inferential statistics: Testing for differences and relationships. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 226–235). London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Björk, B. C. (2004). Open access to scientific publications—An analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research,
9(2), 170.
Google Scholar
Björk, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guonason, G. (2010). Open Access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273.
Google Scholar
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science,
342(6154), 60–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Børing, P., Flanagan, K., Kaloudis, A., & Karakasidou, A. (2010). Mobility survey of the higher education sector. Report. Retrieved 5 January, 2015, from https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:158492/
Bucchi, M. (2004). Science in society: An introduction to social studies of science. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2010). Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. Conservation Biology,
24(3), 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01509.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
108(8), 3157–3162.
Article
Google Scholar
Correia, A. M. R., & Teixeira, J. C. (2005). Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication: From the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access. Online Information Review,
29(4), 349–364.
Article
Google Scholar
Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics,
1(3), 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Crow, J. (2008). Open access and scholarly communication. Retrieved February 24, 2017 from http://eprints.rclis.org/12510/
Darley, R., Reynolds, D., & Wickham, C. (2014). Open access journals in humanities and social science: A British Academy research project. Retrieved 24/04/2014, from http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/index.cfm
Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication,
29(4), 413–434.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(1), 3–8. doi:10.1002/Asi.20965.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citation. The Physiologist,
53, 197–201.
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal,
25(7), 2129–2134.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics,
71(2), 203–215.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal,
337, a568.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, P. M., & Walters, W. H. (2011). The impact of free access to the scientific literature: A review of recent research. Journal of the Medical Library Association,
99(3), 208–217. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Dutton, W., Di Gennaro, C., & Millwood Hargrave, A. (2005). Oxford Internet Survey 2005 report: The internet in Britain. Available at SSRN 1327035.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology,
4(5), e157. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
Article
Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
MATH
Google Scholar
Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia graduate education and careers. Gender & Society,
15(5), 654–666.
Article
Google Scholar
Gaule, P., & Maystre, N. (2011). Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy,
40(10), 1332–1338.
Article
Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2009). Jim Gray on eScience: A transformed scientific method. In T. Hey, S. Tansley, & K. Tolle (Eds.), The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery (pp. xvii–xxx). Redmond: Microsoft Research.
Google Scholar
Hardigan, P. C., Succar, C. T., & Fleisher, J. M. (2012). An analysis of response rate and economic costs between mail and web-based surveys among practicing dentists: A randomized trial. Journal of Community Health,
37(2), 383–394.
Article
Google Scholar
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review,
30(4), 310–314.
Article
Google Scholar
HEFCE. (2015). Policy for open access in the post-2014 research excellence framework: Updated July 2015. Retrieved 31 October 2015, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201407/
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British educational research journal,
36(3), 503–520.
Article
Google Scholar
Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Thompson, D., & Murray, S. S. (2006). Effect of e-printing on citation rates in astronomy and physics. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9(2). doi:10.3998/3336451.0009.202.
HESA. (2013). Higher education statistics for the United Kingdom 2011/12 Retrieved 21 September, 2013, from http://www.hesa.ac.uk/
Hopkins, A. L., Jawitz, J. W., McCarty, C., Goldman, A., & Basu, N. B. (2013). Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors. Scientometrics,
96(2), 515–534.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. Journal of Academic Librarianship,
37(3), 246–254. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017.
Article
Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., et al. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management,
41(6), 1395–1402. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.010.
Article
Google Scholar
Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics,
99(2), 475–494.
Article
Google Scholar
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B. C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961.
Google Scholar
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics,
68(3), 519–533.
Article
Google Scholar
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature,
411(6837), 521.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewin, C. (2005). Elementary quantitative methods. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 215–225). London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Look, H., & Pinter, F. (2010). Open access and humanities and social science monograph publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship,
16(S1), 90–97.
Article
Google Scholar
McCabe, M., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry,
52(4), 1284–1300.
Article
Google Scholar
McGuigan, G., & Russel, R. (2008). The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). Retrieved February 24, 2017 from http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html
Metcalfe, T. S. (2005). The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society,
37, 555–557.
Google Scholar
Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics,
239(1), 549–553.
Article
Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
58(13), 2047–2054. doi:10.1002/Asi.20663.
Article
Google Scholar
Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (2004). Survey methods in social investigation (2nd ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. R. (2009). Online use and information seeking behaviour: Institutional and subject comparisons of UK researchers. Journal of Information Science,
35(6), 660–676. doi:10.1177/0165551509338341.
Article
Google Scholar
Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services and Use,
31(1), 61–83.
Google Scholar
Pham, N., & Bogdan, M. (2010). Automatic data mining on internet by using PERL. Industrial Communication Systems,
65, 1–9.
Google Scholar
Pinfield, S. (2003). Open archives and UK institutions: An overview. D-lib Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march03/pinfield/03pinfield.html
Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., et al. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 20 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A,
368(1926), 4039–4056.
Article
Google Scholar
RCUK. (2013). RCUK policy on open access. Retrieved 21 November 2014, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/
Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2006). The changing scholarly communication landscape: An international survey of senior researchers. Learned Publishing,
19(1), 31–55.
Article
Google Scholar
RussellGroup. (2016). Facts and figures. Retrieved 15 January 2016, from http://russellgroup.ac.uk/about/facts-and-figures/
Schwarz, G. J., & Kennicutt, R. C. J. (2004). Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints. Arxiv preprint
arXiv:astro-ph/0411275.
Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
63(1), 98–107.
Article
Google Scholar
Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: The case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1607-5.
Google Scholar
Swan, A. (2006). The culture of open access: Researchers’ views and responses. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic. Chandos: Technical and Economic Aspects.
Google Scholar
Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing,
17(3), 219–224.
Article
Google Scholar
Thompson, J. W. (2002). The death of the scholarly monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship. Libri,
52(3), 121–136.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics,
103(2), 555–564.
Article
Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. F., & Bowen, B. D. (1977). An introduction to survey research and data analysis. San Francisco: WH Freeman and Company.
Google Scholar
Williams, P., Stevenson, I., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research. Aslib Proceedings,
61(1), 67–82.
Article
Google Scholar
Willinsky, J. (2010). The stratified economics of open access. OJS på dansk,
1(1), 1–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Xia, J. F. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. Journal of Academic Librarianship,
33(6), 647–654.
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Xia, J. F., & Sun, L. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Depositorship and full-text availability. Serials Review,
33(1), 14–21. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2006.12.003.
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar