Bensman, S. J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship versus ISI journal citation reports (JCR) methods and their effect on citation measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(6), 1097–1117.
Article
Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., Newman, D., Duhon, R. J., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Biberstine, J. R., et al. (2011). Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: Comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS ONE,
6(3), e18029.
Article
Google Scholar
de Solla Price, D. J. (1961). Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science,
149(3683), 510–515.
Article
Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1971). The mystery of the transposed journal lists—Wherein Bradford’s law of scattering is generalized according to Garfield’s law of concentration. Current Contents,
3(33), 5–6.
Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics,
1(4), 359–375.
Article
Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics,
56(3), 357–367.
Article
Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,
78(6), 1360–1380.
Article
Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (2001). Why I think research access, impact and assessment are linked. Times Higher Education Supplement,
1487, 16.
Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. (2009). Towards a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(3), 455–476.
Article
Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2016). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23734.
Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,
32(4), 361–375.
Article
Google Scholar
Lavoie, B., Childress, E., Erway, R., Faniel, I., Malpas, C., Schaffner, J., & Van der Werf, T. (2014). The evolving scholarly record. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2014/oclcresearch-evolvingscholarly-record-2014.pdf.
Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics,
11(5), 295–324.
Article
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals are classified in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations using the journal citation reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
57(5), 601–613.
Article
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
67(3), 707–714.
Article
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Comins, J., & Milojević, S. (2016a). Citations: Indicators of quality? The impact fallacy. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. doi:10.3389/frma.2016.00001.
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., & Zhou, P. (2016b). Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal–journal citation relations. Journal of Informetrics,
10(4), 902–918.
Article
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & de Nooy, W. (2017). Can “Hot Spots” in the sciences be mapped using the dynamics of aggregated journal–journal citation relations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 197–213.
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(2), 348–362.
Article
Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Schank, T., Scharnhorst, A., & De Nooy, W. (2008). Animating the development of Social Networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling. El Profesional de la Información,
17(6), 611–626.
Article
Google Scholar
Mabe, M. (2003). The growth and number of journals. Serials,
16(2), 191–197.
Article
Google Scholar
Mabe, M., & Amin, M. (2001). Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics,
51(1), 147–162.
Article
Google Scholar
Marbán, E. (1999). Inaugural editorial: A new era for circulation research. Circulation Research,
85(1), 1–3.
Article
Google Scholar
Marx, W., & Bornmann, L. (2015). On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in web of science. Scientometrics,
102(2), 1823–1827.
Article
Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics,
4(3), 265–277.
Article
Google Scholar
Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics,
33(3), 381–422.
Article
Google Scholar
Newman, M. E., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E,
69(2), 026113.
Article
Google Scholar
Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
53(13), 1113–1119.
Article
Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(9), 1823–1835.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
105(4), 1118–1123.
Article
Google Scholar
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics,
9(5), 281–291.
Article
Google Scholar
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators of publication output and citation impact of european physics research, 1978–1980. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics,
36(1), 126–129.
Article
Google Scholar
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989). World flash on basic research. scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985. Scientometrics,
16(1–6), 3–478.
Article
Google Scholar
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,
43(9), 628–638.
Article
Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In H. H. Pattee (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems (pp. 1–27). New York: George Braziller Inc.
Google Scholar
Tijssen, R., de Leeuw, J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1987). Quasi-correspondence analysis on square scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics,
11(5–6), 347–361.
Google Scholar
Van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,
47(6), 415–436.
Article
Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
63(12), 2378–2392.
Article
Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,
4(4), 629–635.
Article
Google Scholar
Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9/. 10 Oct 2016.