Productivity and mobility in academic research: evidence from mathematicians
- 872 Downloads
Using an exhaustive database on academic publications in mathematics all over the world, we study the patterns of productivity by mathematicians over the period 1984–2006. We uncover some surprising facts, such as the weakness of age related decline in productivity and the relative symmetry of international movements, rejecting the presumption of a massive “brain drain” towards the US. We also analyze the determinants of success by top US departments. In conformity with recent studies in other fields, we find that selection effects are much stronger than local interaction effects: the best departments are most successful in hiring the most promising mathematicians, but not necessarily at stimulating positive externalities among them. Finally we analyze the impact of career choices by mathematicians: mobility almost always pays, but early specialization does not.
KeywordsFaculty productivity Organization of research Peer effects in science
JEL ClassificationD85 I23 J24 L31
- Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2009). Citation statistics: A report from the international mathematical union (IMU) in cooperation with the international council of industrial and applied mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Statistical Science, 24, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS285.
- Borjas, G. J., & Doran, K. B. (2012). The collapse of the soviet union and the productivity of american mathematicians. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Ellison, G. (2010). How does the market use citation data? The Hirsch index in economics. CESifo working paper series 3188, CESifo Group Munich, http://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_3188.html.
- Ellison, G. (2012). Assessing computer scientists using citation data. Technical report, http://economics.mit.edu/files/7784.
- Hill, D., Rapoport, A. I., Lehming, R. F., & Bell, R. K. (2007). Changing US output of scientific articles: 19882003. Technical report NSF 07-320, National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, B. T., Austin, R., Brooks, J., & Moore, J. B. (1984). Economics departmental rankings: Comment. The American Economic Review, 74, 822–826.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. (2010). As science evolves, how can science policy? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Kim, E. H., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2009). Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? Journal of Financial Economics.Google Scholar
- Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81, 114–132.Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16, 317–323.Google Scholar