Abstract
This study analyzes the elements of the nature of science (NOS) with respect to environmental issues in middle-school science textbooks, covering three collections (nine and 12 books) from South Korea and Brazil, respectively. Content analysis was used to categorize the elements of the NOS using the reconceptualized family resemblance approach to the NOS (RFN) framework. The results showed that middle-school science textbooks mentioned the NOS when discussing environmental issues. The Brazilian textbooks mentioned RFN categories more often than the South Korean textbooks (103 vs. 24). Specifically, professional activities were the most mentioned RFN category in the Brazilian textbooks (32, 31.1%), while social values (6, 25%) were most mentioned in the South Korean textbooks. Additionally, the categories of aims and values (2, 1.9%), scientific ethos (1, 1.0%), and political power structures (4, 3.9%) were present in the textbooks from Brazil but not in those from South Korea. The financial system category was not identified in the textbooks of either country. Notably, most mentions of RFN categories in the textbooks were implicit in nature and did not have in-depth descriptions. Based on these results, this study discusses how exploring the general principles of the NOS and its specific applications in environmental issues can promote the role of science textbooks in environmental education. Further, the study findings contribute to clarifying the differences between South Korea and Brazil regarding environmental issues associated with the NOS, indicating that both countries can learn from each other’s perspectives on environmental education and the NOS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific siteracy: A view from the classroom. Science & Education, 23(9), 1911–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8
Barraza, L., & Walford, R. A. (2002). Environmental education: A comparison between English and Mexican school children. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220128239
Base Nacional Comum Curricular: Educação é a Base [Brazilian National Curriculum Common Core - BNCC] (2017). Brasília: MEC. Available at: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf.
Boersema, J. J., & Reijnders, L. (2009). Principles of environmental sciences (pp. 3–14). Springer.
Boujaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066494
BouJaoude, S., Dagher, Z. R., & Refai, S. (2017). The portrayal of nature of science in Lebanese ninth grade science textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: A global perspective (1st ed., pp. 79–97). Routledge.
Breiting, S., & Mogensen, F. (1999). Action competence and environmental education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764990290305
Carvalho, I. C. M. (2007). Educação ambiental e movimentos sociais: elementos para uma história política do campo ambiental ambiental [Environmental Education and Social Movements: elements for a political history of the environmental field]. Educação: Teoria E Prática, 1(2), 46. https://www.periodicos.rc.biblioteca.unesp.br/index.php/educacao/article/view/1597
Chanetsa, T., & Ramnarain, U. (2023). The effect of textbook analysis as a teacher professional development tool on teacher understanding of nature of science. Science & Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00442-7
Cheung, K. K. C., & Erduran, S. (2022). A systematic review of research on family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 32(5), 1637–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00379-3
Colon, A., & Sureda, J. (1981). Hacia una teoría del medio educativo (Bases para una pedagogia ambiental) [Towards a theory of the educational environment (Foundations for an environmental pedagogy)] (pp. 20–21). Ediciones ICE, Universidad de Palma de Mallorca.
Cotham, J. C., & Smith, E. L. (1981). Development and validation of the conceptions of scientific theories test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(5), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660180502
Dhitareka, P. H., Hidayat, A., & Siahaan, P. (2022). Comparison of nature of science profile in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore secondary science textbooks: Case of electricity lesson. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2299–2306. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1878
Duschl, R., Erduran, S., Grandy, R., & Rudolph, J. (2006). Guest editorial: Science studies and science. Science Education, 90(6), 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20187
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Family resemblance approach to characterizing science. In: Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9057-4_2
Fracalanza, H., do Amaral, I. A., Neto, J. M., & Eberlin, T. S. (2008). A educação ambiental no Brasil: panorama inicial da produção acadêmica [Environmental education in Brazil: initial overview of academic production]. Ciências em foco, 1(1). https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/cef/article/view/9162
Fricke, K., & Reinisch, B. (2023). Evaluation of nature of science representations in biology school textbooks based on a differentiated family resemblance approach. Science & Education, 32(5), 1583–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00444-5
Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: A case study for the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134866
Gough, N. (1997). Curriculum development in the postmodern era transformative curriculum leadership. Curriculum Perspectives, 17, 80–81.
Gough, A. (2002a). Mutualism: A different agenda for environmental and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210136611
Gough, N. (2002b). Thinking/acting locally/globally: Western science and environmental education in a global knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210136620
Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. (2008). Consensus: Expanding the scientific method and school science. Teaching Scientific Inquiry, 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460911453_022
Hart, P. (2007). Desires and resistances as drivers and barriers to environmental learning and sustainability : A Canadian perspective. In I. Bjôrneloo & E. Nyberg (Eds.), Drivers and barriers for implementing learning for sustainable development in pre-school through upper secondary and teacher education (pp. 31–36). UNESCO.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Huang, H. P., & Yore, L. D. (2005). A comparative study of Canadian and Taiwanese grade 5 children?s environmental behaviors, attitudes, concerns, emotional dispositions, and knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(4), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-1098-6
Hurd, P. D. (1997). Inventing science education for the new millennium. Ways of knowing in science series. Teachers College Press.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2013). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Springer.
Jenkins, E. W. (2003). Environmental education and the public understanding of science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(8), 437. https://doi.org/10.2307/3868141
Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or how the family resemblance approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25(9–10), 1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9861-3
Khishfe, R. (2014). A reconstructed vision of environmental science literacy: The case of Qatar. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3067–3100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.951980
Kim, C. (2017). Research trends in environmental education of Korea: The past, present, and future. Japanese Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 4_45–50. https://doi.org/10.5647/jsoee.26.4_45
Kim, J. H. (2006). Analysis of Trends in Environmental Education Research of Korea. Master’s Thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education.
Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660050204
Ko, A. C. C., & Lee, J. C. K. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching environmental issues within the science curriculum: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025094122118
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
Kurt, G., & Kaya, E. (2023). Toward a holistic vision on the nature of science in science curricula: an investigation of primary and middle school curricula in Turkey. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2262400
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Latif, S. A., Omar, M. S., Bidin, Y. H., & Awang, Z. (2013). Role of environmental knowledge in creating pro-environmental residents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.088
Layrargues, P. P., & Lima, G. F. D. C. (2014). As macrotendências político-pedagógicas da educação ambiental brasileira [The political-pedagogical macro trends in Brazilian environmental education]. Ambiente & Sociedade, 17(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44220003500
Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education (1st ed., pp. 845–894). Routledge.
Leff, E. (2001). Epistemologia ambiental [Environmental epistemology], 2, (Vieira, Ed.). Cortez São Paulo.
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the Focus: From Nature of Science (NOS) to Features of Science (FOS). Advances in Nature of Science Research, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_1
McComas, W. F. (2014). Nature of science in the science curriculum and in teacher education programmes in the United States. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1993–2023). Springer.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. The nature of science in science education (pp. 3–39). Springer.
Neto, J. M. (2012). Educação ambiental como campo de conhecimento: a contribuição das pesquisas acadêmicas para sua consolidação no Brasil Environmental education as a field of knowledge: the contribution of academic research to its consolidation in Brazil. Pesquisa Em Educação Ambiental, 4(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.18675/2177-580x.vol4.n2.p95-110
Novo, M. (2009). Environmental education, a genuine education for sustainable development. Revista de educación, 195–217.
Okan, B., & Kaya, E. (2022). Exploring the inclusion of nature of science in Turkish middle school science textbooks. Science & Education, 32(5), 1515–1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00371-x
Okan, B., & Kaya, E. (2023). A content analysis of the representation of the nature of science in a Turkish science textbook. Fostering Scientific Citizenship in an Uncertain World: Selected Papers from the ESERA 2021 Conference (pp. 63–78). Springer International Publishing.
Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. In Handbook of research on science education (1st ed., pp. 785–816). Routledge.
Park, H. (2014). Comparison of rnvironmental education contents in science textbook between Korea and Illinois State in USA - Focused on environmental education contents of 3rd ~ 6th grades. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.453
Park, W., Yang, S., & Song, J. (2019). When modern physics meets nature of science: The representation of nature of science in general relativity in new Korean physics textbooks. Science & Education, 28(9–10), 1055–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00075-9
Pasquini, N. C. (2016). Estado da arte da educação ambiental [State of the art of environmental education]. Revista Tecnológica da Fatec Americana, 4(1) 37–50. http://www.fatec.edu.br/revista_ojs/index.php/RTecFatecAM/article/view/62/72.
Payne, P. G. (2006). Environmental education and curriculum theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/joee.37.2.25-35
Prien, B. (2004). Family resemblances a thesis about the change of meaning over time. KRITERION - Journal of Philosophy, 18(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2004-011805
Reigota, M. (2012). O estado da arte da Pesquisa em educação ambiental no Brasil [The state of the art of research in environmental education in Brazil]. Pesquisa Em Educação Ambiental, 2(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.18675/2177-580x.vol2.n1.p33-66
Reinisch, B., & Fricke, K. (2022). Broadening a nature of science conceptualization: Using school biology textbooks to differentiate the family resemblance approach. Science Education, 106(6), 1375–1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21729
Rubba, P. A., & Andersen, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620404
Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
Shobeyri, S. M., Omidvar, B., & Prahallada, N. N. (2007). A comparative study of environmental awareness among secondary school students in Iran and India. International Journal of Environmental Research, 1(1), 28–34.
Showalter, V. M. (1974). What is unified science education? Program objectives and scientific literacy. Prism II, 2(3–4), 1–6.
South Korea Ministry of Education. (2015). The National Science Curriculum. Notification No. 2015–74.
Szagun, G., & Pavlov, V. I. (1995). Environmental awareness: A comparative study of German and Russian adolescents. Youth & Society, 27(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x95027001006
Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2014). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
Vlaardingerbroek, B., & Taylor, T. N. (2007). The environmental knowledge and attitudes of prospective teachers in Lebanon: A comparative study. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 16(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee213.0
Voss, S., Kent-Schneider, I., Kruse, J., & Daemicke, R. (2023). Investigating the development of preservice science teachers’ nature of science instructional views across rings of the family resemblance approach wheel. Science & Education, 32(5), 1363–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00418-7
Wu, J. Y., & Erduran, S. (2022). Investigating scientists’ views of the family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 33(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00313-z
Yacoubian, H. A. (2012). Towards a philosophically and a pedagogically reasonable nature of science curriculum (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.
Yang, S., Park, W., & Song, J. (2020). Representations of nature of science in new Korean science textbooks: The case of ‘scientific inquiry and experimentation’. Science education in the 21st century: Re-searching issues that matter from different lenses, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_2
Yeh, Y. F., Dhurumraj, T., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). Representations of the nature of science in South African physical sciences textbooks on electricity and magnetism. Science & Education, 32(5), 1537–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00370-y
Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, B.B., Ha, S. Reconceptualized Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science in Middle-School Science Textbooks from Brazil and South Korea Regarding Environmental Issues. Sci & Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00514-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00514-2