Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night

An Interpretation Based on an Inferential Approach to Representations

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyzed students’ representational constructions of the day/night process. This study identified the ways students build their representations or models based on their interpretations of school representations. The study participants were 151 students from a semi-urban primary school. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Analysis utilized the inferential approach to identify intentionality, interpretation, denotation, reasoning, and coordination rules in students’ constructions. The results showed that only a few students were able to integrate school representations coherently as intended, and most of these students were in the upper grades. Even when students in the middle grades constructed reasoning processes, they did so use other elements of interpretation and denotation that are not equivalent to those in the school representations. We also found that most children failed to establish any discernible process that would indicate whether they used elements from the school model to infer explanations for the day/night process; that is, they had fragmented elements of representations that prevented them from making valid inferences. Finally, the approach described in this paper is useful for identifying difficulties that students face when dealing with scientific school representations since it offers elements for reconsidering the usual external representations that are used to teach science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2013). A ‘semantic’ view of scientific models for science education. Science & Education, 22, 1593–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9431-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E. (2014). Students’ conceptions as dynamically emergent structures. Science & Education, 23, 1463–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9655-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, T., & Blown, E. (2013). Children’s concepts of the shape and size of the Earth, sun and moon. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 388–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2006). The development of human conceptual representation. In M. Johnson & Y. Munakata (Eds.), Process of change in brain and cognitive development: Attention and performance XXI. (pp. 473–493). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contessa, G. (2007). Scientific representation, interpretation, and surrogative reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 48–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentations: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Camacho, F., & Gallegos-Cázares, L. (1998). Partial possible models: An approach to interpret students’ physical representation. Science Education, 82, 15–29.

  • Fredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2015). Enhancing the possibilities for learning: Variations of disciplinary-relevant aspects in physics representations. European Journal of Physics, 36(5), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S., Forbus, K., & Sherin, B. (2018). Representing, running, and revising mental models: A computational model. Cognitive Science, 42, 1110–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R. (2006). Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria, 55, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galano, S., Colantonio, A., Leccia, S., Marzoli, I., Puddu, E., & Testa, I. (2018). Developing the use of visual representations to explain basic astronomy phenomena. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010145-1-010145-30.

  • Gallegos-Cázares, L., Flores-Camacho, F., Calderón-Canales, E., Perrusquía-Máximo, E., & García-Rivera, B. (2014). Children’s models about colours in Nahuatl-speaking communities. Research in Science Education, 44, 699–725.

  • Gallegos-Cázares, L., Flores-Camacho, F., Calderón-Canales, E., & Posada de la Concha J. M. (2017) Representations over the Earth’s shape and the process of day and night from Nahua indigenous school children. Journal for the Study of Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1292683.

  • Giere, R. (2010). An agent-based conception of model and scientific representation. Synthese, 172, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry. In John K. Gilbert., Reiner Mirian, & Nakhleh Mary (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). Springer.

  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (1997). The kinds of mental representations-models, propositions and images-used by college physics students regarding the concept of field. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 711–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun, I. A. (2004). Modelling theory in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huges, R. I. G. (1997). Models and representation. Philosophy of Science, 64, S325–S336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, A., & Morman, T. (2006). Scientific theories as intervening representations. Theoria, 55, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., Zimmerman, C., & Jirout, J. (2011). Educational interventions to advance children’s scientific thinking. Science, 333, 971–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, T. (2005). Models, representation, and mediation. Philosophy of Science, 72, 1260–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, T. (2011). Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, T., & Boon, M. (2011). How do models give us knowledge? The case of Carnot’s ideal heat engine. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 1, 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, T., & Voutilainen, A. (2003). A parser as an epistemic artifact: A material view of models. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1482–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Cognitive Development (pp. 371–393). Blackwell Publishing.

  • Lee, V. R. (2010). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US middle school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1099–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2010). Inference to the best explanation. In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. (pp. 193–202). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Pena, B., & Gil Quilez, J. M. (2001). The importance of images in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children. Assessment and relation with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction, 29, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindertsma, H. B., van Dijk, M. W. G., Steenbeek, H. W., & van Geert, P. L. C. (2014). Assessment of preschooler’s scientific reasoning in adult-child interactions: What is the optimal context? Research in Science Education, 44, 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, G., Martin, A., & Panagiotaki, G. (2005). The development of scientific knowledge of the earth. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. (1979). Children’s conceptions of the earth as a cosmic body: A cross age study. Science Education, 63(1), 83–93.

  • Olson, E. J. (2014). Coherentism. In S. Bernecker & D. Pritchard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to epistemology. (pp. 257–267). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnafes, O. (2012). Developing explanations and developing understanding: Students explain the phases of the moon using visual representations. Cognition and Instruction, 30(4), 359–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pero, F., & Suárez, M. (2016). Varieties of misrepresentation and homomorphism. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 6, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D., Bower, C. A., & Liben, S. L. (2016). The role of perspective taking in how children connect reference frames when explaining astronomical phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D., Kocareli, A., & Slagle, C. (2014). Learning to explain astronomy across moving frames of reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1083–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2013). Representing and learning in science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science. (pp. 1–14). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, E. A., & Kastens, A. K. (2012). Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students’ analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 713–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1996). Mental models of the Earth, sun and moon: Indian children’s cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children’s understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2011). Planes y programas de estudio. Secretaría de Educación Pública.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2018). Libros de texto gratuitos. Secretaría de Educación Pública. https://libros.conaliteg.gob.mx/content/common/consulta-libros-gb/index.jsf?busqueda=false&nivelEscolar=5&grado=8&materia=&editorial=&tipo=&clave=&titulo=&autor=&key=key-5-8 Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  • Sharp, G. J. (1999). Young children’s ideas about the Earth in space. International Journal of Early Years Education, 7(2), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M., Buttereorth, G., & Newcombe, P. A. (2004). Culture and children’s cosmology. Developmental Science, 7(3), 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, M. (2003). Scientific representations: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, M. (2004). An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 767–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (1974). The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese, 87(3), 449–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, O., & Ramdeem, K. (2015). Hierarchical cluster analysis: Comparison of three linkage measures and applications to psychological data. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11(1), 8–21.

  • Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank José Manuel Posada de la Concha and Humberto Ángel Albornoz Delgado.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico

    Leticia Gallegos-Cázares, Fernando Flores-Camacho & Elena Calderón-Canales

Authors
  1. Leticia Gallegos-Cázares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Flores-Camacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elena Calderón-Canales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leticia Gallegos-Cázares.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallegos-Cázares, L., Flores-Camacho, F. & Calderón-Canales, E. Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night. Sci & Educ 31, 35–54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1

Search

Navigation