Abstract
This multiple-case study examined the rationales and instructional strategies for teaching history of science (HOS) of 16 instructors of a history of science course for undergraduate preservice teachers in the USA. Based on instructor syllabi, instructional materials, and instructor interviews, we conducted single-case and cross-case analyses to identify why they teach HOS (rationales), how they teach HOS (instructional strategies), and what possible relationships might underlie instructor rationales and their instructional strategy choices for teaching HOS. We found 10 rationales in three overarching categories (knowledge, skills, and attitudes) and 9 active-learning instructional strategies. Moreover, we found that instructors with skills rationales implemented active-learning instructional strategies, whereas instructors who only cited knowledge rationales relied only on lectures and reading discussions. We discuss implications and recommendations for the design of HOS courses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2009). A research-informed instructional unit to teach the nature of science to pre-service science teachers. Science & Education, 18(9), 1177–1192.
Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: perspectives and resources. Saint Paul: SHiPS Education Press.
Bravo, A. A., Merce, I., & Anna, E. (2001). A characterisation of practical proposals to teach the philosophy of science to prospective science teachers. Paper presented at the IOSTE Symposium, Paralimni, Cyprus.
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.
Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.
de Hosson, C., & Décamp, N. (2014). Using ancient Chinese and Greek astronomical data: a training sequence in elementary astronomy for pre-service primary school teachers. Science & Education, 23(4), 809–827.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: a teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. In Rotterdam. The Netherlands: Sense.
Justi, R., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2016). Discussion of the controversy concerning a historical event among pre-service teachers. Science & Education, 25(7–8), 795–822.
Kokkotas, P., Piliouras, P., Malamitsa, K., & Stamoulis, E. (2009). Teaching physics to in-service primary school teachers in the context of the history of science: The case of falling bodies. Science & Education, 18(5), 609–629.
Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.
Lonsbury, J. G., & Ellis, J. D. (2002). Science history as a means to teach nature of science concepts: using the development of understanding related to mechanisms of inheritance. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(2).
Magnusson, K., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Springer.
Matthews, M. R. (1992). History, philosophy, and science teaching: the present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1(1), 11–47.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
McComas, W. F. (2010). The history of science and the future of science education: a typology of approaches to the history of science in science instruction. In P. V. Kokkotas, K. S. Malamitsa, & A. A. Rizaki (Eds.), Adapting historical knowledge production to the classroom (pp. 37–54). Rotterdam: Sense.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Nouri, N. (2019). Teaching aspects of the nature of science: a review of the literature with implications for effective NOS instruction. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction. Boston: Springer Academic (in press).
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-sience-standards. Accessed 30 May, 2013.
Niaz, M. (2009). Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies. Science & Education, 18(1), 43–65.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.
Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science during a historically based unit. Science & Education, 23(9), 1879–1909.
Rutherford, F. J. (2001). Fostering the history of science in American science education. In Science, education, and culture (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Springer.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Schiffer, H., & Guerra, A. (2015). Electricity and vital force: Discussing the nature of science through a historical narrative. Science & Education, 24(4), 409–434.
Sherratt, W. J. (1983). History of science in the science curriculum: an historical perspective. Part II: Interest shown by teachers. School Science Review, 64, 418–424.
Teixeira, E. S., Greca, I. M., & Freire, O., Jr. (2012). The history and philosophy of science in physics teaching: a research synthesis of didactic interventions. Science & Education, 21(6), 771–796.
UTeach Institute. (n.d.). Who we are. Retrieved from https://institute.uteach.utexas.edu/who-we-are.
Vanderlinden, D. W. (2007). Teaching the content and context of science: the effect of using historical narratives to teach the nature of science and science content in an undergraduate introductory geology course. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: teachers’ perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169–189.
Williams, C. T., & Rudge, D. W. (2016). Emphasizing the history of genetics in an explicit and reflective approach to teaching the nature of science: a pilot study. Science & Education, 25(3–4), 407–427.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nouri, N., McComas, W.F. & Aponte-Martinez, G.J. Instructors’ Rationales and Strategies for Teaching History of Science in Preservice Settings. Sci & Educ 28, 367–389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00055-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00055-z